Prophylactic use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt aids in the treatment of refractory ascites: metaregression and trial sequential meta-analysis.

GOALS: The aim of this study was to explore whether prophylactic use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) could aid in the treatment of refractory ascites on the basis of current randomized controlled trials. BACKGROUND: TIPS is more effective for refractory ascites versus large-volume paracentesis. At present, however, the survival advantage is not clear within populations of undifferentiated patients. STUDY: Correlative studies were searched through online journal databases, and a manual search was done from 1974 to 2012. Six trials involving 390 patients were included. RESULTS: TIPS could ameliorate refractory ascites on the basis of short-term analysis [odds ratio (OR) 8.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.27-14.24] and long-term analysis (OR 6.07; 95% CI, 3.60-10.22). Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) appeared more common in the TIPS arm (OR 2.95; 95% CI, 1.87-4.66). Mortality in the 2 groups did not show any difference (OR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.46-1.50). Trial sequential analysis confirmed the effect of TIPS upon ascites control and upon the risk of HE recurrence, whereas insufficient trials were available to distinguish between the arms on mortality. Metaregression analysis showed that the level of urine sodium, serum bilirubin, and portal pressure gradient reduction value could be used as survival predictors. Subgroup analysis showed an elevated survival effect in TIPS (OR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81), and patients survived longer with recurrent ascites (OR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: TIPS was confirmed to improve ascites control in both the short term and the long term. Although HE frequently appeared in the TIPS group, patients with better hepatic and renal function survived longer when they were treated with TIPS. Serum bilirubin and urine sodium could be used as pre-TIPS predictors for patient survival. Portal pressure gradient reduction values could be used as post-TIPS predictors of survival.

Sarcopenic Obesity Is Associated with Severe Postoperative Complications in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy: a Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the risk of severe postoperative complications (SPCs) in patients with gastric cancer and to construct a nomogram based on independently related factors to identify high-risk patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 636 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy. Degrees of sarcopenia and obesity were calculated before surgery. Factors contributing to SPCs were determined using univariate and multivariate analysis. A nomogram consisting of the independent risk factors was constructed to quantify the individual risk of SPCs. RESULTS: Logistic analysis revealed that sarcopenic obesity, age, open surgery, and combined resection were independent prognostic factors for SPCs. Sarcopenic obese patients have the highest risk in all patients (sarcopenic obesity vs normal, OR = 6.575 p = 0.001; sarcopenic obesity vs obesity, OR = 5.833 p = 0.001; sarcopenic obesity vs sarcopenia, OR = 2.571 p = 0.032), while obese patients share the similar rate of SPCs with normal people (obesity vs normal, OR = 1.056 p = 0.723). The nomogram we constructed was able to quantify the risk of SPCs reliably (c-index, 0.737). CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenic obesity, together with age, open surgery, and combined resection are independent predictors of SPCs. Obesity will significantly increase the risk of SPCs in sarcopenic patient with gastric cancer, but it will not bring higher risk to normal patients. Our nomogram is a simple and practical instrument to identify patients at high risk of surgical complications.