Bilateral hip arthroscopy for treating femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a hip disorder which can often present bilaterally. The purpose of this systematic review was to explore the current practices for bilateral hip arthroscopy in treating FAI as they relate to outcomes and complications. METHODS: This review has been conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from data inception to October 18th, 2020. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess study quality. Data are presented descriptively. RESULTS: Overall, 19 studies were identified, comprising 957 patients (48.6% male) with a mean age of 27.9 ± 7.1 years and a mean follow-up of 31.7 ± 20.8 months. The majority of patients were treated with a staged bilateral hip arthroscopy (78.5%) with a mean duration between surgeries of 7.1 ± 4.0 months. Significant preoperative-to-postoperative improvements for clinical outcomes such as pain, hip function, and health-related daily living as well as radiographic outcomes were reported in six studies for staged procedures (p < 0.05) and three studies for simultaneous procedures (p < 0.02). Significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes (e.g., HOS-ADL, Pain, HOS-SS, mHHS, and NAHS) were found in favor of those undergoing a shorter delay between surgeries in three studies (i.e., < 3, 10 or 17 months) (p < 0.05) compared to those who had delayed surgeries (i.e., > 3, 10, or 17 months). The overall complication rate was 10.1% (97/957). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral surgery for FAI yields improved outcomes postoperatively and complication rates similar to unilateral surgery. The overall complication rate was 10.1% with the most common complication being revision surgery. Staged bilateral surgery is more commonly performed than simultaneous surgery. Clinicians should consider preoperative imaging, clinical history, and patient values when deciding between staged and simultaneous procedures for bilateral FAI surgery. Future studies are required to determine the optimal indications for simultaneous versus staged procedures, as well as the ideal timing between surgeries for the latter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Should Preoperative Fascia Iliaca Block Be Used for Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair and Femoroacetabular Impingement Treatment? A Prospective Single Blinded Randomized Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the analgesic effect of preoperative fascia iliaca block on postoperative morphine equivalent dose, pain level, and patient satisfaction for patients electing to undergo primary hip arthroscopic labral repair with osteochondroplasty. METHODS: This prospective study included 60 patients (fascia iliaca block group: n = 27; control group: n = 33) undergoing elective arthroscopic hip surgery by a single board-certified orthopedic surgeon, fellowship trained in hip arthroscopy. Participants for the study included patients older than 10 years of age and younger than 85 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications I to III, diagnosed with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement, and/or hip labral tear, and/or cartilage damage, and electing to undergo arthroscopic hip surgery. Patients were randomized by surgical date to receive preoperative fascia iliaca block or control (no fascia iliaca block). Preoperative fascia iliaca block was administered by 1 of 4 board certified anesthesiologists using identical anesthetic (35-40 mL ropivacaine 0.35%). Postoperative morphine equivalent dose, self-reported pain level (visual analog scale) and patient satisfaction were measure postoperatively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the control group and the fascia iliaca block group in sex, age, height, weight, or body mass index. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups in distribution of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p = .031). There were no significant differences in postoperative morphine equivalent dose for patients receiving fascia iliaca block compared with the control group. There were no significant differences in self-reported visual analog scale pain and patient satisfaction between the 2 groups at any of the measured time points following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, routine preoperative fascia iliaca block for elective hip arthroscopic labral repair and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement is not recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective single blinded randomized study.

Arthroscopic labral reconstruction in the hip using iliotibial band autograft: technique and early outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the indications for and outcomes of arthroscopic labral reconstruction in the hip by use of iliotibial band (ITB) autograft. METHODS: Between August 2005 and May 2008, the senior author (M.J.P.) performed 95 arthroscopic labral reconstructions using an ITB autograft in patients with advanced labral degeneration or deficiency. There were 47 patients who had undergone surgery at a minimum of 1 year previously and met the inclusion criteria. The modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and patient satisfaction were used to measure outcomes postoperatively. The labral autograft was harvested from the ITB through a separate incision. The graft was sutured to the intact labral remnant in the region of labral deficiency, re-establishing the suction seal of the hip joint. RESULTS: There were 32 men and 15 women. The mean age at the time of surgery was 37 years (range, 18 to 55 years). The mean time from the onset of symptoms to labral reconstruction was 36 months (range, 1 month to 12 years). Subsequent total hip arthroplasty was performed in 4 patients (9%). Follow-up was obtained in 37 of the remaining 43 patients. The mean time to follow-up was 18 months (range, 12 to 32 months). The mean MHHS improved from 62 (range, 35 to 92) preoperatively to 85 (range, 53 to 100) postoperatively (P = .001). Median patient satisfaction was 8 out of 10 (range, 1 to 10). Patients who were treated within 1 year of injury had higher MHHSs than patients who waited longer than 1 year (93 v 81, P = .03). The independent predictor of patient satisfaction with outcome after labral reconstruction was age. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patients who have labral deficiency or advanced labral degeneration had good outcomes and high patient satisfaction after arthroscopic intervention with acetabular labral reconstruction. Lower satisfaction was associated with joint space narrowing and increased age. Patients who waited longer than 1 year from the time of injury to surgery had lower function at follow-up than those treated in the first year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Modified Pull-Through Technique for Hip Labral Reconstruction Using A Suture Suspension Bridge.

Preservation of hip labral function is a primary goal in hip preservation surgery. Arthroscopic labral reconstruction in the hip is an alternative procedure for irreparable labrum in the nonarthritic hip population, with beneficial outcomes reported. Several challenges occur during labral reconstruction that make the procedure more difficult. The first is measuring the labral defect and matching the graft perfectly to the patient. The second is subsequent suture fixation and passage around the graft when it is loose within the joint. We propose a modification to the pull-through technique that both eliminates the inaccuracies in graft measurement and minimizes graft damage by eliminating the step of suture passage around the graft. This technique can be used for both segmental reconstruction or circumferential reconstruction of the hip labrum and can also accommodate knotless and knot-tied anchors. The advantages of this technique are increased procedure accuracy and efficiency.

Complete arcuate foramen precluding C1 lateral mass screw fixation in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: case report.

Case report of a complete arcuate foramen in a human atlas vertebra inhibiting the placement of lateral mass screw instrumentation at C1. Our objective is to report the presentation of the case, the operative considerations, and the management for this anatomic variation. The groove for the vertebral artery on the posterolateral surface of the atlas (C1) varies in size and depth from a slight impression to a clear sulcus. With anomalous ossification the sulcus can be bridged which results in a posterolateral tunnel within the posterior arch of the atlas. With increasing rates of screw fixation instrumentation that include the atlas, it is of paramount importance to know the location and course of the vertebral artery in relation to the planned route of instrumentation. The patient underwent a posterolateral fusion from C1 to C4 using autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Internal fixation from C2 to C4 was obtained using lateral mass screw instrumentation. After the vertebral artery was identified passing through the posterior arch of C1, sublaminar wires were utilized for fixation from C1 to C2. The patient responded well to surgical intervention without complications. Abnormal vertebral artery coursing through a posterolateral tunnel in the posterior arch of C1 has been described and its incidence has a range from 1.14% to 18%. When this variant is present, lateral mass screw fixation at C1 may be contra-indicated. We recommend close scrutiny of preoperative radiographs to avoid the possibility of endangering the vertebral artery when this situation exists.

Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee: survivorship analysis.

BACKGROUND: Active patients with arthritic malalignment of the knee are difficult to manage. Arthroplasty, unicompartmental or total knee replacement, may not be appropriate in patients who desire to remain highly active. High tibial osteotomy has been recommended for the treatment of varus osteoarthritis to decrease pressure on the damaged medial compartment. PURPOSE: To determine the length of time patients with varus gonarthrosis can avoid knee arthroplasty with chondral resurfacing (microfracture) and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: From 1995 to 2001, the senior authors performed a medial opening wedge HTO/microfracture in 106 knees (mean age, 52 years; range, 30-71 years). Survivorship was defined as not requiring knee arthroplasty after microfracture and HTO. RESULTS: At 5 years, survivorship was 97%. At 7 years, survivorship was 91%. Twelve patients proceeded to arthroplasty at a mean of 81 months (range, 19-116 months). Follow-up was obtained for 90% of patients. At most recent follow-up, the mean Lysholm score was 71 (range, 5-100). At 3 years, the mean Lysholm score was 73, Tegner score was 2.8, and patient satisfaction was 7.9. At 5 years, the mean Lysholm score was 73, Tegner score was 3.8, and patient satisfaction was 7.5. At 9 years, the mean Lysholm score was 67, Tegner score was 3.1, and patient satisfaction was 7.5. Patients with medial meniscus injury at surgery were 9.2 times more likely to undergo arthroplasty than patients without (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-13.5; P = .015). CONCLUSION: With 91% survivorship at 7 years, microfracture/HTO seems to contribute to a delay of knee replacement in active patients with varus gonarthrosis. Patients who proceeded to knee arthroplasty after combined HTO/microfracture had a mean delay of 81.3 months.