Foot Pain is Common, But Frequently Improves 1 Year After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis frequently affects multiple joints through the lower limbs. This study sought to examine the incidence of foot pain in subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine if foot symptoms improved following surgery. METHODS: Six hundred ten subjects undergoing TKA completed patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively, and at 6 and/or 12 months after surgery including the incidence and severity of foot or ankle pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) Joint Replacement, Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), EQ5D, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Foot or ankle pain was reported in 45% before, 32% at 6 months, and 36% at 12 months after TKA. Of those with preoperative foot pain, 42% at 6 months and 50% at 12 months reported no foot pain after TKA, and the Visual Analog Scale severity reduced from a mean of 4.0 before to 1.7 after surgery. Those with preoperative foot pain had lower baseline KOOS (P = .001), OKS (P = .001), and more depression/anxiety (P = .010), but experienced equivalent postoperative KOOS, OKS, and satisfaction with surgery, compared to those without foot pain. CONCLUSION: Foot or ankle pain was reported by nearly half of TKA subjects, but resolved after surgery in 50%. Those with preoperative foot pain experienced at least equivalent improvement in knee-related symptoms and mobility compared to those without foot pain. The presence of foot pain should not be a deterrent to TKA.

The diagnostic accuracy of Böhler's angle in fractures of the calcaneus.

BACKGROUND: Böhler's historical tuber-joint angle of the calcaneus has been used since 1931. Surprisingly, there is a paucity of literature on its use. OBJECTIVES: To confirm the normal range for Böhler's angle and determine the angle with the highest accuracy in the diagnosis of calcaneal fractures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. The study cohort comprised 424 patients spanning a 5-year period from April 2005 to March 2010. Böhler's angle was measured by two independent observers on lateral x-ray study using the digital angle tool from the Picture Archival and Communication System. Data were analyzed using Stata 8 statistical software package. RESULTS: The mean Böhler's angle in patients without calcaneal fracture was 29.4°. In this group there was no difference in Böhler's angle between male and female patients, left and right feet, or across age. In those patients with calcaneal fractures, a Böhler's angle below 25° was moderately predictive of calcaneal fracture (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 82%), an angle below 23° was highly predictive of calcaneal fracture (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 89%), and an angle below 21° was strongly suggestive of calcaneal fracture (sensitivity = 99%, specificity = 99%). A Böhler's angle of ≤ 20° had the highest diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: A Böhler's angle of 20° or less is highly accurate in determining the presence or absence of calcaneal fracture. Böhler's angle serves as a useful screening tool in fracture diagnosis.

Opioid use and patient outcomes in an Australian hip and knee arthroplasty cohort.

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of opioid use in Australian hip (THA) or knee (TKA) cohort, and its association with outcomes. METHODS: About 837 primary THA or TKA subjects prospectively completed Oxford Scores, and Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score(KOOS/HOOS) and opioid use in the previous week before arthroplasty. Subjects repeated the baseline survey at 6 months, with additional questions regarding satisfaction. RESULTS: Opioid use was reported by 19% preoperatively and 7% at 6 months. Opioid use was 46% at 6 weeks and 10% at 6 months after TKR, and 16% at 6 weeks and 4% at 6 months after THR. Preoperative opioid use was associated with back pain(OR 2.2, P = 0.006), anxiety or depression(OR 1.8, P = 0.001) and Oxford knee scores <30(OR 5.6, P = 0.021) in TKA subjects, and females in THA subjects(OR 1.7, P = 0.04). There was no difference between preoperative opioid users and non-users for satisfaction, or KOOS or HOOS scores at 6 months. 77% of patients taking opioids before surgery had ceased by 6 months, and 3% of preoperative non users reported opioid use at 6 months. Opioid use at 6 months was associated with preoperative use (OR 6.6-14.7, P < 0.001), and lower 6 month oxford scores (OR 4.4-83.6, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: One in five used opioids before arthroplasty. Pre-operative opioid use was the strongest risk factor for opioid use at 6 months, increasing odds 7-15 times. Prolonged opioid use was rarely observed in the opioid naïve (<5% TKA and 1% THA). Preoperative opioid use was not associated with inferior outcomes or satisfaction.

Outcomes of operatively treated interprosthetic femoral fractures.

AIMS: The prevalence of ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rising in concert with life expectancy, putting more patients at risk for interprosthetic femur fractures (IPFFs). Our study aimed to assess treatment methodologies, implant survivorship, and IPFF clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 76 patients treated for an IPFF from February 1985 to April 2018 were reviewed. Prior to fracture, at the hip/knee sites respectively, 46 femora had primary/primary, 21 had revision/primary, three had primary/revision, and six had revision/revision components. Mean age and BMI were 74 years (33 to 99) and 30 kg/m2 (21 to 46), respectively. Mean follow-up after fracture treatment was seven years (2 to 24). RESULTS: Overall, 59 fractures were classified as Vancouver C (Unified Classification System (UCS) D), 17 were Vancouver B (UCS B). In total, 57 patients (75%) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); three developed nonunion, three developed periprosthetic joint infection, and two developed aseptic loosening. In all, 18 patients (24%) underwent revision arthroplasty including 13 revision THAs, four distal femoral arthroplasties (DFAs), and one revision TKA: of these, one patient developed aseptic loosening and two developed nonunion. Survivorship free from any reoperation was 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 66.9% to 90.6%) and 77% (95% CI 49.4% to 90.7%) in the ORIF and revision groups at two years, respectively. ORIF patients who went on to union tended to have stemmed knee components and greater mean interprosthetic distance (IPD = 189 mm (SD 73.6) vs 163 mm (SD 36.7); p = 0.546) than nonunited fractures. Patients who went on to nonunion in the revision arthroplasty group had higher medullary diameter: cortical width ratio (2.5 (SD 1.7) vs 1.3 (SD 0.3); p = 0.008) and lower IPD (36 mm (SD 30.6) vs 214 mm (SD 32.1); p < 0.001). At latest follow-up, 95% of patients (n = 72) were ambulatory. CONCLUSION: Interprosthetic femur fractures are technically and biologically challenging cases. Individualized approaches to internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty led to an 81% (95% CI 68.3% to 88.6%) survivorship free from reoperation at two years with 95% of patients ambulatory. Continued improvements in management are warranted. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):122-128.

The Infection Rate of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement Is Higher When Compared to Other Bearing Surfaces as Documented by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite the well-documented decline in the use of metal-on-metal (MoM) implants over the last decade, there are still controversies regarding whether all MoM implants are created equally. Complications such as elevated serum metal ion levels, aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) and pseudotumours have all been well documented, but recent studies suggest increased risk of infection with MoM bearing surfaces. Most of these studies however have small patient numbers. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to examine the cumulative incidence of revision for infection of MoM bearing surfaces in primary hip arthroplasty at a national and single-surgeon level. METHODS: Data was collected from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, which contains over 98% of all arthroplasties performed in Australia since 2001. The cumulative incidence of revision for infection was extracted at a national level and single-surgeon level. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-six thousand eight hundred seventy-eight subjects were documented in the Australian registry. The 10-year cumulative percent revision for infection of MoM bearing surfaces in primary total hip replacement (THR) was 2.5% at a national level, compared to 0.8% for other bearing surfaces. The senior author contributed 1755 subjects with 7-year follow-up and a cumulative percent revision for infection of MoM bearing surfaces in primary THR of 36.9%, compared to 2.0% for other bearing surfaces. The cumulative percent of revision of MoM bearing surfaces is higher compared to other bearing surfaces; this is especially pronounced in cumulative percent of revision for infection. CONCLUSION: There was a higher cumulative percent of revision for infection in MoM bearings surfaces (in particular, large-head MoM) compared to other bearing surfaces at both the national and individual-surgeon level.