Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Lupus Nephritis.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). Materials and Methods: Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of 387 patients with LN were retrospectively collected from 2007 to 2017. PH was defined as pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥40 mmHg assessed by resting transthoracic echocardiography. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was renal events, defined as the doubling of baseline serum creatinine or end-stage renal disease. Associations between PH and outcomes were analyzed by Cox regression models. Results: A total of 15.3% (59/387) of patients with LN were diagnosed with PH, and the prevalence of PH was higher for patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with an eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (31.5% vs. 12.6%). Higher mean arterial pressure, lower hemoglobin, and lower triglyceride levels were associated with greater odds of having PH. After adjusting for relevant confounding variables, PH was independently associated with a higher risk for death (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.01-4.00; p = 0.047) and renal events (HR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.04-4.12; p = 0.039). Conclusions: PH is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and adverse renal outcomes in patients with LN.

Fetal and maternal outcome in patients with active lupus nephritis: comparison between new-onset and pre-existing lupus nephritis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate fetal and maternal outcomes in women with active lupus nephritis (LN). Specifically, we compared women who had new-onset LN and those with pre-existing LN during pregnancy. METHODS: Patients with active LN during pregnancy were divided into the new-onset group (LN first occurred during pregnancy) and the pre-existing group (a history of LN) on the basis of the onset time of LN. Data on clinical features, laboratory findings, and pregnancy outcome were collected and analyzed between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare the effects of active LN on adverse pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: We studied 73 pregnancies in 69 women between 2010 and 2019. Of these, 38 pregnancies were in the pre-existing LN group and 35 were in the new-onset group. Patients with pre-existing LN had a higher risk of composite adverse fetal outcomes than those with new-onset LN [adjusted odds ratio (ORs), 44.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-1664.82; P = 0.039]. However, the two groups had similar adverse maternal outcomes (ORs, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.36-4.29). Serum albumin and proteinuria significantly improved after pregnancy (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the long-term renal outcome was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant patients with pre-existing LN were associated with a higher risk of composite adverse fetal outcomes than those with new-onset LN. However, these two groups of patients had similar adverse maternal outcomes. The long-term renal outcomes were not different after pregnancy between these two groups.

Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of lupus nephritis patients with scanty immune depositions in kidney biopsies.

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathological features, outcomes, and pathogenesis of lupus nephritis with scanty immune deposits in the kidney biopsy remain unclear. METHODS: Four hundred ninety-eight biopsy-proven lupus nephritis patients were included, and clinical and pathological data were collected. The primary endpoint was mortality, while the secondary endpoint was doubling baseline serum creatinine or end-stage renal disease. Associations between scanty immune deposits lupus nephritis and adverse outcomes were analyzed by Cox regression models. RESULTS: Among 498 lupus nephritis patients, 81 were diagnosed with scanty immune deposits. Patients with scanty immune deposits had significantly higher serum albumin and serum complement C4 than those with immune complex deposits. The proportion of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies was similar between the two groups. In addition, patients with scanty immune deposits showed less proliferative features at kidney biopsy and lower activity index score, accompanied by milder mesangial cell and matrix hyperplasia, endothelial cell hyperplasia, nuclear fragmentation, and glomerular leukocyte infiltration. Patients in this group also had a milder degree of foot process fusion. Overall, renal survival and patient survival showed no significant difference between the two groups. 24-h proteinuria and chronicity index were significant risk factors for renal survival, and 24-h proteinuria and positive anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies were risk factors for patient survival in scanty immune deposits lupus nephritis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other lupus nephritis patients, scanty immune deposits lupus nephritis patients had significantly lower activity features on kidney biopsy, but have similar outcomes. Positive anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies may be a risk factor for patient survival in scanty immune deposits lupus nephritis patients.