RESUMO
Introduction: To assess the performance of the European Thyroid Association Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System (EU-TIRADS) and the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS), which combine risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules (TN-RSS) and cervical lymph nodes (LN-RSS) in diagnosing malignant and metastatic thyroid cancer in a single referral center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,055 consecutive patients who underwent thyroidectomy or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) from January 2021 to December 2022. TNs and LNs were categorized according to the ultrasonography (US) features of EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS, respectively. The diagnostic performance and postponed malignancy rate (PMR) were compared with those of EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS. PMR was defined as the number of patients with malignant nodules not recommended for biopsy among patients with cervical LN metastasis. Results: According to the EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS, for TN-RSS alone, there were no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, unnecessary FNA rate (UFR), missed malignancy rate (MMR), and PMR between the two TIRADSs (29.0% vs. 28.8%, 50.5% vs. 51.1%, 32.3% vs. 32.2%, 23.6% vs. 23.5%, 88.6% vs. 88.5%, and 54.2% vs. 54.5%, P > 0.05 for all). Combining the LN-RSS increased the diagnostic accuracy (42.7% vs. 32.3% in EU-TIRADS; 38.8% vs. 32.2% in K-TIRADS) and decreased the PMR (54.2% vs. 33.9% in EU-TIRADS; 54.5% vs. 39.3% in K-TIRADS). EU-TIRADS had higher sensitivity and accuracy and lower PMR than K-TIRADS (41.3% vs. 36.7%, 42.7% vs. 38.8%,33.9% vs. 39.3%, P < 0.05 for all). Conclusions: A combination of TN-RSS and LN-RSS for the management of thyroid nodules may be associated with a reduction in PMR, with enhanced sensitivity and accuracy for thyroid cancers in EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS. These results may offer a new direction for the detection of aggressive thyroid cancers.
RESUMO
Background: The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic and therapeutic performances of the artificial intelligence (AI), American College of Radiology (ACR), and Kwak Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADSs) using the size thresholds for fine needle aspiration (FNA) and follow-up defined in the ACR TIRADS. Methods: This retrospective study included 3,833 consecutive thyroid nodules identified in 2,590 patients from January 2010 to August 2017. Ultrasound (US) features were reviewed using the 2017 white paper of the ACR TIRADS. US categories were assigned according to the ACR/AI and Kwak TIRADS. We applied the thresholds for FNA and follow-up defined in the ACR TIRADS to the Kwak TIRADS. The diagnostic and therapeutic performances were calculated and compared using the McNemar or DeLong methods. Results: The AI TIRADS had higher specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) than did the ACR and Kwak TIRADS (specificity: 64.6% vs. 57.4% and 52.69%; accuracy: 78.5% vs. 75.4% and 73.0%; AUC: 88.2% vs. 86.6% and 86.0%; all P values <0.05). Meanwhile, the AI TIRADS had a lower FNA rate (FNAR), unnecessary FNA rate (UFR), and follow-up rate (FUR) than did the ACR and Kwak TIRADS using the size thresholds of the ACR TIRADS (specificity: 30.9% vs. 34.4% and 36.9%; accuracy: 41.1% vs. 47.8% and 48.7%; AUC: 34.2% vs. 37.7% and 41.0%; all P values <0.05). In addition, the Kwak TIRADS incorporating the size thresholds of the ACR TIRADS was almost similar to the ACR TIRADS in diagnostic and therapeutical performance. Conclusions: The ACR TIRADS can be simplified, which potentially enhances its diagnostic and therapeutic performance. The method of score-based TIRADS (counting in the Kwak TIRADS and weighting in the ACR and AI TIRADS) might not determine the diagnostic and therapeutic performances of the TIRADS. Thus, we propose choosing a straightforward and practical TIRADS in daily practice.