RESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab003.].
RESUMO
Objectives: Coronary and cardiac calcification are frequent incidental findings on non-gated thoracic computed tomography (CT). However, radiologist opinions and practices regarding the reporting of incidental calcification are poorly understood. Methods: UK radiologists were invited to complete this online survey, organised by the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (BSCI). Questions included anonymous information on subspecialty, level of training and reporting practices for incidental coronary artery, aortic valve, mitral and thoracic aorta calcification. Results: The survey was completed by 200 respondents: 10% trainees and 90% consultants. Calcification was not reported by 11% for the coronary arteries, 22% for the aortic valve, 35% for the mitral valve and 37% for the thoracic aorta. Those who did not subspecialise in cardiac imaging were less likely to report coronary artery calcification (p = 0.005), aortic valve calcification (p = 0.001) or mitral valve calcification (p = 0.008), but there was no difference in the reporting of thoracic aorta calcification. Those who did not subspecialise in cardiac imaging were also less likely to provide management recommendations for coronary artery calcification (p < 0.001) or recommend echocardiography for aortic valve calcification (p < 0.001), but there was no difference for mitral valve or thoracic aorta recommendations. Conclusion: Incidental coronary artery, valvular and aorta calcification are frequently not reported on thoracic CT and there are differences in reporting practices based on subspeciality. Advances in knowledge: On routine thoracic CT, 11% of radiologists do not report coronary artery calcification. Radiologist reporting practices vary depending on subspeciality but not level of training.
RESUMO
Background: The prevalence of culture negative infective endocarditis (IEC) is reported as 2-7% though this figure may be as high as 70% in developing countries.1 This higher rate will, at least in part, be due to reduced diagnostic facilities though some data suggests higher rates even when appropriate cultures were taken. The frequency is significantly elevated in patients who have already been exposed to antibiotics prior to blood cultures.1 , 2 A rare cause of culture negative IEC is the HACEK group of organisms that are normal habitants of the oropharyngeal flora and account for 1-3% of native valve endocarditis.3 Aggregatibacter aphrophilus (A. aphrophilus) is a member of the HACEK group of organisms. Case summary: A 32-year-old gentleman with a previous bioprosthetic aortic valve presented with a 1-week history of diarrhoea, vomiting, malaise, and weight loss. He was awaiting redo surgery for stenosis of the bioprosthesis, which had been inserted aged 17 for aortic stenosis secondary to a bicuspid valve. The initial blood tests revealed liver and renal impairment with anaemia. A transoesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated a complex cavitating aortic root abscess, complicated by perforation into the right ventricle. He underwent emergency redo surgery requiring debridement of the aortic abscess, insertion of a mechanical aortic prosthesis (St Jude Medical, USA), annular reconstruction and graft replacement of the ascending aorta. Despite antibiotic therapy, he remained septic with negative blood and tissue cultures. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing confirmed A. aphrophilus infection, for which intravenous ceftriaxone was initiated. This was subsequently changed to ciprofloxacin due to neutropenia. The patient self-discharged from the hospital during the third week of antibiotic therapy. One week later, he was re-admitted with fever, night sweats, and dyspnoea. Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a large recurrent aortic abscess cavity around the aortic annulus fistulating into the right heart chambers; this was confirmed by a computed tomography scan. There was dehiscence of the patch repair. Emergency redo aortic root replacement (25 mm mechanical valve conduit, ATS Medical, USA) and annular reconstruction was performed with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support. VA-ECMO was weaned after 3 days. The patient completed a full course of intravenous meropenem and ciprofloxacin and made a good recovery. Discussion: IEC with oropharyngeal HACEK organisms is rare and difficult to diagnose, due to negative blood culture results. The broad-range polymerase chain reaction and gene sequencing with comparison to the DNA database is useful in these circumstances. This case demonstrates the importance of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing for HACEK infection diagnosis and appropriate antibiotic treatment.
RESUMO
Incidental coronary and cardiac calcification are frequent findings on non-gated thoracic CT. We recommend that the heart is reviewed on all CT scans where it is visualised. Coronary artery calcification is a marker of coronary artery disease and it is associated with an adverse prognosis on dedicated cardiac imaging and on non-gated thoracic CT performed for non-cardiac indications, both with and without contrast. We recommend that coronary artery calcification is reported on all non-gated thoracic CT using a simple patient-based score (none, mild, moderate, severe). Furthermore, we recommend that reports include recommendations for subsequent management, namely the assessment of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and, if the patient has chest pain, assessment as per standard guidelines. In most cases, this will not necessitate additional investigations. Incidental aortic valve calcification may also be identified on non-gated thoracic CT and should be reported, along with ancillary findings such as aortic root dilation. Calcification may occur in other parts of the heart including mitral valve/annulus, pericardium and myocardium, but in many cases these are an incidental finding without clinical significance.