Oxygen breathing or recompression during decompression from nitrox dives with a rebreather: effects on intravascular bubble burden and ramifications for decompression profiles.

Preventive measures to reduce the risk of decompression sickness can involve several procedures such as oxygen breathing during in-water decompression. Theoretical predictions also suggest that brief periods of recompression during the course of decompression could be a method for controlling bubble formation. The aim of this study was to get clearer information about the effects of different experimental ascent profiles (EAPs) on bubble reduction, using pure oxygen or recompression during decompression for nitrox diving. Four EAPs were evaluated using bubble monitoring in a group of six military divers using Nitrox 40% O(2) breathing with a rebreather. For EAP 1 and 2, 100% O(2) was used for the end stage of decompression, with a 30% reduction of decompression time in EAP 1 and 50% in EAP 2, compared to the French navy standard schedule. For EAP 3 and 4, nitrox 40% O(2) was maintained throughout the decompression stage. EAP 3 is based on an air standard decompression schedule, whereas EAP 4 involved a brief period of recompression at the end of the stop. We found that EAP 1 significantly reduced bubble formation, whereas high bubble grades occurred with other EAPs. No statistical differences were observed in bubbles scores between EAP 3 and 4. One diver developed mild neurological symptoms after EAP 3. These results tend to demonstrate that the "oxygen window" plays a key role in the reduction of bubble production and that breathing pure oxygen during decompression stops is an optimal strategy to prevent decompression sickness for nitrox diving.

A closed-circuit rebreather for the characterization of denitrogenation.

BACKGROUND: The denitrogenation methods currently used to characterize the washout kinetics of body nitrogen require costly devices that are not easily transportable for measurements in real conditions. An original and simple system to measure the denitrogenation kinetics of the human body at rest and at ambient pressure is presented here. METHODS: The nitrogen content accumulated in the loop of a closed-circuit rebreather supplied by pure oxygen was determined using galvanic oxygen sensors and a small size data logger for pressure, temperature, and relative humidity measurements. The method was applied to three subjects through a preliminary validation phase. The collected data, after processing, were compared: 1) to the results found in previous papers for similar experiments using other methods; and 2) to the results of a physiological gas exchanges model. RESULTS: Denitrogenation curves for 60-min and 120-min durations were obtained for the three subjects, with an interindividual variability being in agreement with their body fat percentage (560 +/- 140 ml for the subject with less body fat and 880 +/- 70 ml for the subject with more body fat) after 60 min. Both the experimental results found in the literature and the simulation results were compared to the present results. CONCLUSION: From a preliminary analysis, the proposed denitrogenation procedure proved to be adequate compared to other methods. An investigation of the method demonstrated that the system accuracy can be improved. A validation phase using more subjects may support the use of this new technology.

Reliability of venous gas embolism detection in the subclavian area for decompression stress assessment following scuba diving.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasonic detection of venous gas emboli (VGE) in the precordial (PRE) region is commonly used in evaluation of decompression stress. While subclavian (SC) VGE detection can also be used to augment and improve the evaluation, no study has rigorously compared VGE grades from both sites as decompression stress indicators. METHODS: This retrospective study examined 1,016 man-dives breathing air extracted from the Defence Research and Development Canada dataset. Data for each man-dive included dive parameters (depth, bottom time, total ascent time), PRE and SC VGE grades (Kisman-Masurel) and post-dive decompression sickness (DCS) status. Correlation between SC and PRE grades was analyzed and the association of the probability of DCS (pDCS) with dive parameters and high bubble grades (HBG III- to IV) was modelled by logistic regression for SC and PRE separately for DCS risk ratio comparisons. RESULTS: PRE and SC VGE grades were substantially correlated (R = 0.66) and were not statistically different (p = 0.61). For both sites, pDCS increased with increasing VGE grade. When adjusted for dive parameters, the DCS risk was significantly associated with HBG for both PRE (p = 0.03) and SC (p < 0.001) but the DCS risk ratio for SC HBG (RR = 6.0, 95% CI [2.7-12.3]) was significantly higher than for PRE HBG (RR = 2.6, 95% CI [1.1-6.0]). CONCLUSIONS: The association of bubble grades with DCS occurrence is stronger for SC than PRE when exposure severity is taken into account. The usefulness of SC VGE in decompression stress evaluation has been underestimated in the past.

Submarine rescue decompression procedure from hyperbaric exposures up to 6 bar of absolute pressure in man: effects on bubble formation and pulmonary function.

Recent advances in submarine rescue systems have allowed a transfer under pressure of crew members being rescued from a disabled submarine. The choice of a safe decompression procedure for pressurised rescuees has been previously discussed, but no schedule has been validated when the internal submarine pressure is significantly increased i.e. exceeding 2.8 bar absolute pressure. This study tested a saturation decompression procedure from hyperbaric exposures up to 6 bar, the maximum operating pressure of the NATO submarine rescue system. The objective was to investigate the incidence of decompression sickness (DCS) and clinical and spirometric indices of pulmonary oxygen toxicity. Two groups were exposed to a Nitrogen-Oxygen atmosphere (pO2 = 0.5 bar) at either 5 bar (N = 14) or 6 bar (N = 12) for 12 h followed by 56 h 40 min resp. 60 h of decompression. When chamber pressure reached 2.5 bar, the subjects breathed oxygen intermittently, otherwise compressed air. Repeated clinical examinations, ultrasound monitoring of venous gas embolism and spirometry were performed during decompression. During exposures to 5 bar, 3 subjects had minor subjective symptoms i.e. sensation of joint discomfort, regressing spontaneously, and after surfacing 2 subjects also experienced joint discomfort disappearing without treatment. Only 3 subjects had detectable intravascular bubbles during decompression (low grades). No bubbles were detected after surfacing. About 40% of subjects felt chest tightness when inspiring deeply during the initial phase of decompression. Precordial burning sensations were reported during oxygen periods. During decompression, vital capacity decreased by about 8% and forced expiratory flow rates decreased significantly. After surfacing, changes in the peripheral airways were still noticed; Lung Diffusion for carbon monoxide was slightly reduced by 1% while vital capacity was normalized. The procedure did not result in serious symptoms of DCS or pulmonary oxygen toxicity and may be considered for use when the internal submarine pressure is significantly increased.