Medical students and the response to COVID-19: Educational preparedness and psychological impact of their involvement in communicating with patients' relatives.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged without precedent both healthcare and educational systems worldwide. How medical students could and should be engaged in the response remains unclear. Medical students were asked to help with communicating with patients' relatives in our institution. Authors aimed: to (i) present the rapid implementation and assessment of a teaching/e-teaching lesson in the COVID-19 era; (ii) report an early evaluation of preparedness, mental health and well-being of students involved. METHODS: The lesson was elaborated at lockdown in France. The clinical guidance consisted of a voluntary lesson entitled: "How to communicate with relatives of hospitalized COVID-19 patients?". Students received an anonymous online questionnaire after two weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-six medical students were trained (32% face-to-face). The response rate was 64%. Most students informed relatives about the routine care of the patient (95%). Concerning the lesson, students assured to have had one (95%), considered it relevant (86%), and had used the educational content (81%). 33% were charged with unexpected missions (only 36% felt prepared). Most of them did not report any psychological impact, but some reported anxiety or sleep disorders with no difference between face-to-face/distance training. CONCLUSIONS: This pandemic may last. Communication ability is a key competence in medical curriculum and is more than ever essential. Distance learning technologies may provide a useful and accepted tool for medical students. We report on a rapid feedback on what can be expected or not from students in terms of mission and short-term psychological consequences.

Determinants of the interindividual variability in serum cytidine deaminase activity of patients with solid tumours.

AIMS: Cytidine deaminase (CDA) activity in cancer patients' serum has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for efficacy and toxicity of nucleoside analogues. However, discrepant results about its predictive value have been reported due to the high interindividual variability in CDA activity. This study aimed at identifying determinants of this interindividual variability. METHODS: From December 2014 to November 2015, 183 patients were prospectively included. Serum CDA activity, biological and clinical characteristics as well as five common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CDA gene (c.-451C > T, c.-92A > G, c.-33_-31delC, c.79A > C, c.435 T > C) were analysed. Associations between clinical characteristics, pharmacogenetic variants and CDA activity were univariately tested. P < 0.1-candidate variables were analysed through a multivariate analysis. The association between CDA activity and toxicity was assessed for the 56 gemcitabine-treated patients. Intraindividual variability in CDA activity was explored in six pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine. RESULTS: Median CDA activity was 3.97 U mg-1 (range 1.53-15.49 U mg-1 ). A univariate analysis showed that CDA activity was statistically associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, mild or severe malnutrition, inflammatory syndrome, leucocyte count, neutrophil count, albumin, C-reactive protein and -c.-33_-31delC single nucleotide polymorphism. A multivariate analysis identified that only neutrophil count (P < 0.0001) and severe malnutrition (P = 0.0278) were independently associated with CDA activity. Low CDA activity (<2 U mg-1 ) was not statistically associated with severe gemcitabine-related toxicities (P = 0.16). A decrease in CDA activity was observed during the longitudinal follow-up of six pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neutrophil count and malnutrition should be considered for the interpretation of pretherapeutic CDA activity.

[Multidisciplinary and systematic preoperatory-assessment in geriatric urologic oncology surgery: Feasibility and results]. / Évaluation pluridisciplinaire préopératoire systématique en chirurgie cancérologique urologique gériatrique : faisabilité et résultats.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cancer increases with age, especially for urological cancers. The frailty of the elderly persons may expose them to more postoperative complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity or even increased mortality, and delayed or impossible return to normal life. In such cases, the benefit of surgery and therefore its realization can be questioned. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This article reports the experience of a pre-operative risk assessment in a population of elderly patients treated for urologic cancer. This retrospective study aims to report the feasibility and the main results of this systematic preoperative multi-professional evaluation. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and February 2017, 31 elderly patients were evaluated. The evaluation revealed: moderate to severe malnutrition in 59 % of cases, a patient judged from a geriatric point of view fit, intermediate or fragile in respectively 25 %, 35 % and 40 % of cases. This evaluation led to propose a modification of an element of care for 66 % of patients and to propose therapeutic abstention for only 3 patients. CONCLUSION: An evaluation whose purpose is to adapt to the physiological age of patients and their overall state of health, surgical treatment and postoperative management is feasible and seems to help unmask elements of fragility usually not detected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Role of the lean body mass and of pharmacogenetic variants on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sunitinib in cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Sunitinib is a multikinase inhibitor active in various cancers types including renal cancers and endocrine tumors. The study analyzed the influence of the lean body mass (LBM) and of pharmacogenetic variants on the exposure to sunitinib and its active metabolite, SU12662, and on sunitinib toxicity and clinical activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Exposure to sunitinib and SU12662 was assessed on days 10 and 21 during the first treatment cycle. Acute toxicity was graded using the NCI 4.0 CTCAE ver. 4.0. The LBM and 14 common single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CYP3A4/3A5, NR1I2, NR1I3, ABCB1, and ABCG2 genes were analyzed according to the drug exposure at day 10. Determinants (including sunitinib exposure and pharmacogenetic variants) for toxicities were assessed, as well as the relationship between drug exposure and survival in renal cancer patients. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (60 % with renal cancer) were assessable for pharmacokinetics, toxicity and survival, and 66 for genetic analysis. The LBM (p < 0.0001) and a polymorphism in the ABCG2 transporter (421C>A) (p = 0.014) were two independent parameters accounting for the variability of composite (sunitinib + SU12662) exposure. Advanced age (OR = 1.47 [1.01-2.15], p = 0.048) and high sunitinib exposure (OR = 1.16 [1.05-1.28], p = 0.005) were independently associated with any grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity, and high SU12662 exposure was associated with grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia (OR = 1.27 [1.03-1.57], p = 0.028). A high composite area under the curve (AUC) >1,973 ng/mL∙h at day 21 was associated with a doubled survival (35.2 vs 16.7 months; log-rank p = 0.0051) in renal cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that LBM and drug monitoring may be helpful in the management of sunitinib-treated patients.

Sarcopenia and body mass index predict sunitinib-induced early dose-limiting toxicities in renal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on factors predicting sunitinib toxicity. Recently, the condition of low muscle mass, named sarcopenia, was identified as a significant predictor of toxicity in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with sorafenib. We investigated whether sarcopenia could predict early dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurrence in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. METHODS: Consecutive mRCC patients treated with sunitinib were retrospectively reviewed. A DLT was defined as any toxicity leading to dose reduction or treatment discontinuation. Body composition was evaluated using CT scan obtained within 1 month before treatment initiation. RESULTS: Among 61 patients eligible for analysis, 52.5% were sarcopenic and 32.8% had both sarcopenia and a body mass index (BMI)<25 kg m(-2). Eighteen patients (29.5%) experienced a DLT during the first cycle. Sarcopenic patients with a BMI<25 kg m(-2) experienced more DLTs (P=0.01; odds ratio=4.1; 95% CI: (1.3-13.3)), more cumulative grade 2 or 3 toxicities (P=0.008), more grade 3 toxicities (P=0.04) and more acute vascular toxicities (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Patients with sarcopenia and a BMI<25 kg m(-2) experienced significantly more DLTs during the first cycle of treatment.

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients with abnormal body composition and relation with carboplatin toxicity.

PURPOSE: Carboplatin clearance is correlated with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and usually estimated with creatinine clearance using Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula. Because plasma creatinine level is highly correlated with muscle mass, we hypothesized that an abnormal body composition with a low lean body mass (LBM) percentage [(LBM/weight) × 100] may result in inadequate carboplatin dosing. Serum cystatin C is an alternative marker of GFR, not affected by muscle mass. We aimed to investigate the influence of total LBM and LBM percentage on GFR calculation, using creatinine (CrCl) or cystatin C (GFRcysC-creat) in cancer patients. METHODS: Pretreatment serum creatinine and cystatin C were prospectively measured in consecutive patients. CrCl (CG formula), GFRcysC-creat (CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin equation), and LBM (CT scan) were calculated. Severe thrombocytopenia post-carboplatin were analyzed. RESULTS: In 131 patients without renal insufficiency, LBM was correlated with creatinine (r = 0.30, p < 0.005) but not with cystatin C (r = -0.07, p = 0.43). In patients with the lowest LBM percentage, the CrCl was significantly higher than GFRcysC-creat indicating an overestimation of GFR with creatinine (p = 0.0004). In 24 patients treated with carboplatin AUC 5 (mg/ml min) ± paclitaxel, the risk of severe thrombocytopenia was associated with lower LBM percentage (p = 0.0002) and higher CrCl/GFRcysC-creat ratio (p = 0.006). By ROC analysis, the CrCl/GFRcysC-creat ratio threshold predicting severe thrombocytopenia was 1.23. CONCLUSIONS: A low LBM percentage increases the risk of inadequate GFR calculation by CG formula, and carboplatin overdosage with severe thrombocytopenia. High CrCl/GFRcysC-creat ratio allows the identification of these patients.

Relation between plasma trough concentration of abiraterone and prostate-specific antigen response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone (ABI) is a major oral agent for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients but its systemic exposure is subject to a large inter-individual variability. We aimed to explore the relationship between ABI trough plasma concentration and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in mCRPC patients and to identify the critical determinants for its activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a monocentric prospective observational study in mCRPC patients treated with ABI. The plasmatic concentration of ABI at steady state was measured using liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. The primary objective was to study the relationship between mean ABI plasma exposure (ABI Cmin) and 3-month PSA response. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, 61 mCRPC patients were eligible for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment. Thirty-eight patients experienced PSA response (62%, [confidence interval {CI} 95% 50-78]). In univariate analysis, ABI Cmin was 1.5-fold higher in responders: 12.0 ng/mL (CI 95% 9.4-15.6) versus 8.0 ng/mL (CI 95% 5.8-11.6; P = 0.0015). In multivariate analysis, only ABI Cmin was independently associated with PSA response (odds ratio = 1.12 [CI 95% 1.01-1.25], P = 0.004). By receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal threshold for ABI Cmin was 8.4 ng/mL. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in patients with ABI Cmin above 8.4 ng/mL (hazard ratio 0.55, [CI 95% 0.31-0.99], 12.2 [CI 95% 9.2-19.5] versus 7.4 [CI 95% 5.5-14.7] months otherwise, P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that ABI trough concentration correlates with PSA response and PFS. Moreover, we could determine a cut-off value of plasmatic concentration for PSA response. Altogether, ABI concentration monitoring appears as a new approach to improve clinical outcome in mCPRC patients.