RESUMO
Light-induced amaurosis is a rare manifestation of symptomatic carotid artery disease. Unlike amaurosis fugax, which is often attributed to embolic phenomenon associated with carotid artery disease, light-induced amaurosis has been associated with reduced perfusion to the eye, secondary to carotid artery disease, leading to retinal ischemia. The case described here is that of a 67-year-old male with bilateral vision loss in response to bright light. Imaging revealed severe internal carotid stenosis on the right and occlusion of the internal carotid artery on the left. Similar to previous cases reported in the literature, the symptoms resolved after carotid endarterectomy.
Assuntos
Cegueira/etiologia , Artéria Carótida Interna , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Luz/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Cegueira/diagnóstico , Cegueira/fisiopatologia , Artéria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Carótida Interna/cirurgia , Estenose das Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Humanos , Masculino , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Visão Ocular , Percepção VisualRESUMO
Background: Recent data indicate that the three-month prevalence of severe headaches or migraines in the US general population is close to 25%. Participation of primary care providers will therefore be critical in providing care to affected individuals. Objective: To determine the number of headache disorder consult requests to a neurology outpatient service in a tertiary medical center, the appropriateness of the consult requests, and the effectiveness of a lecture series on headache diagnosis and management in preventing inappropriate consult requests from non-neurology providers. Methods: Clinical data on US Veterans is captured and documented in the Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VISTA). The Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) electronic medical record (EMR) was used for data entry and retrieval. All consult requests for the study period within the VA North Texas Health Care System were identified in VISTA, and the clinical information reviewed in CPRS. Based on a defined algorithm, headache consult request were categorized as appropriate or inappropriate. A board-certified neurologist provided four in-person/virtual lectures to ambulatory care providers, primary care providers, internal medicine residents, and emergency room providers within the VA North Texas Health Care System on the diagnosis and management of headaches. Prior and post the lecture series, the total number of headache consults per day was assessed over 45-day periods. Results: The number of daily headache consult requests in the 45-day period prior to the lecture series was 3.6 per day (standard deviation 2.7), and 6.0 per day after the lecture series (standard deviation 2.1). The difference was not statistically significant. There were as many inappropriate headache consult requests after the lecture series as appropriate ones (50% each). Conclusion: We found that a short-term educational initiative that instructed primary care providers on the diagnosis and management of common headache disorders did not reduce the number of consultation requests and, surprisingly, it did not improve the appropriateness of the consults. Given the prevalence of headaches in the general population, better training of all primary care providers in headache management should be pursued.