Development and Implementation of an Inpatient CAMEO© Staffing Algorithm to Inform Nurse- Patient Assignments in a Pediatric Cardiac Inpatient Unit.

BACKGROUND: Nursing workload measurement systems are vital to determine nurse staffing for safe care. The Inpatient Complexity and Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (CAMEO©) acuity tool provides a standardized language to communicate the acuity and complexity of nursing care in the pediatric inpatient setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: A process improvement project was implemented on a pediatric cardiac inpatient unit to utilize the Inpatient CAMEO© tool to inform nurse-patient assignments. Development of the Inpatient CAMEO© Staffing Algorithm utilized a modified Delphi methodology. Six Delphi rounds were performed for algorithm development, addressing potential implementation barriers, educating nursing staff, piloting feasibility, and final full implementation. RESULTS: The cardiac inpatient unit's charge nurses' algorithm utilization was 86% (n = 12) during the feasibility pilot. The algorithm impacted and changed 28% (n = 4) of the shifts' assignments. One-year post algorithm implementation, CAMEO© documentation rates increased from 25 to 30% to >60%. A retrospective, two-week point-prevalence analysis one-year post-implementation described adherence to the Inpatient CAMEO© Staffing Algorithm for 87% (n = 375) of the nurses' patient assignments. CONCLUSIONS: The Inpatient CAMEO© Staffing Algorithm was developed based upon the Inpatient CAMEO© tool and the Inpatient CAMEO© Complexity Classification System to inform nurse-patient assignments and allocate nursing resources. The Inpatient CAMEO© Staffing Algorithm was feasible and sustainable for over one year following implementation at a single center's pediatric cardiac inpatient unit.

The Measurement of Pediatric Inpatient Nursing Using the Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (CAMEO©) Tool.

PURPOSE: Physiologic measurement of patient acuity has been used to predict patient outcomes, length of stay, and resource utilization. To date, these tools are not sufficiently comprehensive to inform nurse staffing assignments and have limited practical application. The Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (CAMEO©) acuity tool was initially developed and validated to quantify patient acuity in terms of complexity of nursing cognitive workload in pediatric intensive care units (ICU). This article describes development and implementation of the Inpatient CAMEO© in the pediatric inpatient setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: Utilizing a modified Delphi technique, an expert panel convened to scale and implement the Inpatient CAMEO© in the pediatric inpatient units through four Delphi rounds. RESULTS: The expert panel identified care items unique to the pediatric inpatient setting and assigned a cognitive workload scale of 1-5. To consolidate the tool, the panel identified items to be classified as "Standard of Care" and developed a new baseline score for the Inpatient CAMEO©. Expert panel members served as unit-based ambassadors to foster the expansion and implementation of the new Inpatient CAMEO©. CONCLUSIONS: The Inpatient CAMEO© describes and quantifies acuity beyond the intensive care setting. The implementation and use of the Inpatient CAMEO© was accomplished through unit-based ambassadors and the support of leadership. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Quantifying nursing cognitive workload in both direct and indirect care is important to determining nursing assignments and comprehensive staffing models in the pediatric inpatient setting.

The current practice and care of paediatric patients post cardiac catheterisation.

BACKGROUND: Literature is lacking to guide standardised care and assessment practices for paediatric patients post cardiac catheterisation. In response to this gap, we sought to describe the current state of practice in cardiology programmes performing paediatric cardiac catheterisations procedures in the United States of America.Materials and methodsA web-based survey was distributed to the Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium Listserv, with representation from 113 identified institutions. A 36-question survey, including fixed-choice and open-ended questions, was developed and piloted for reliability and validity before distribution. Data were summarised descriptively with count and frequency or median and range. RESULTS: Of the 113 identified institutions, 52% (n=59) responded to the survey. Manual pressure is used to achieve haemostasis by 94.9% of the respondents. Pressure dressings are used by a majority of the facilities and the length of time for bed rest is variable, with the majority using 6 hours for arterial access and 4 hours for venous access. Predominantly, respondents use the time of haemostasis as the start time of bed rest while a third of respondents reported using the time the sheath was removed. CONCLUSION: In this study, variation in a number of post catheterisation care and assessment practices for paediatric patients was noted across cardiology programmes. Information from this assessment identifies key opportunities to collaborate in developing standardised practices for the care and assessment of the paediatric patients post catheterisation.

Monitoring the health of the work environment with a daily assessment tool: the REAL - Relative Environment Assessment Lens - indicator.

BACKGROUND: Evidence shows that the health of the work environment impacts staff satisfaction, interdisciplinary communication, and patient outcomes. Utilising the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses' Healthy Work Environment standards, we developed a daily assessment tool. METHODS: The Relative Environment Assessment Lens (REAL) Indicator was developed using a consensus-based method to evaluate the health of the work environment and to identify opportunities for improvement from the front-line staff. A visual scale using images that resemble emoticons was linked with a written description of feelings about their work environment that day, with the highest number corresponding to the most positive experience. Face validity was established by seeking staff feedback and goals were set. RESULTS: Over 10 months, results from the REAL Indicator in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory indicated an overall good work environment. The goal of 80% of the respondents reporting their work environment to be "Great", "Good", or "Satisfactory" was met each month. During the same time frame, this goal was met four times in the cardiovascular operating room. On average, 72.7% of cardiovascular operating room respondents reported their work environment to be "Satisfactory" or better. CONCLUSION: The REAL Indicator has become a valuable tool in assessing the specific issues of the clinical area and identifying opportunities for improvement. Given the feasibility of and positive response to this tool in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, it has been adopted in other patient-care areas where staff and leaders believe that they need to understand the health of the environment in a more specific and frequent time frame.

Expanding Hospital Capacity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Family Voice Matters.

During the initial COVID-19 response, this children's hospital reduced its inpatient capacity by 52 beds with double rooms' conversion to single patient occupancy, causing significant capacity constraints. To solve this challenge, the family perspective was engaged to safely redouble patient rooms and expand capacity as clinical activity increased during the COVID-19 response. METHODS: The team conducted qualitative descriptive interviews with parents of children undergoing congenital heart surgery admitted to the inpatient cardiac unit in a 404-bed free-standing children's hospital. A 2-week pilot study utilizing patient-specific inclusion criteria, newly developed patient room guidelines, universal masking, physical distancing, and inpatient room enhancements with parent COVID-19 testing was conducted. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted [pre (n = 7) and post (n = 6)] regarding patient room redoubling. Participants perceived utilization of double rooms as safe with increased protection, including universal masking, physical distancing, room enhancements, and increased bathroom cleaning. However, some families verbalized anxiety regarding visitation restriction to one parent at a time at the bedside. Additional concerns were voiced around the timing of communication about the need to be placed in a double room. In response, visitation increased to 2 parents at bedside and communication of utilization of double rooms was included in preoperative preparations postpilot. Inclusion criteria were expanded to patients of all ages and included full use of shared in-room bathrooms by parents and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Parents perceived patient room redoubling as safe and family centered. Findings from the pilot study were used to scale broad utilization and increase access to care across the institution.