Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58450, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38765345

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global calamity that forced emergency use authorization to Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 (BNT162b2) vaccine. It is efficacious in preventing symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in seronegative recipients. The safety profile is still unclear; however, commonly reported symptoms post-vaccination are fatigue, headache, muscle pain, chills, and injection-site pain. COVID-19 disease elicits, to some extent, cutaneous side effects like urticaria, morbilliform rash, and chilblain-like eruption. Vaccination against COVID-19 was reported to induce similar dermatologic manifestations, such as urticarial rash, delayed large-local reaction, local injection-site reaction, and morbilliform eruption. Erythema multiforme (EM) is a rare manifestation post-vaccination, and only a few reports implicate it as a culprit in cutaneous eruptions following the BNT162b2 vaccine. This report delineates the presentation of a healthy 14-year-old girl to a dermatology clinic who developed EM post-vaccination with the first dose of BNT162b2. New-onset EM-eruption post-vaccination with BNT162b2 had been reported previously in 14 cases, and one case reported on the flare of preexisting-EM.

2.
Cureus ; 16(3): e56310, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628985

RESUMO

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has led to accelerated development and utilization of vaccines to prevent its implications on health. One of these vaccines is a vector-based, Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine (AZD1222). Frequently reported side effects are related to host-immune response. While dermatologic manifestation is peculiar in nature and denotes a serious eruption that might defer future vaccination. Herein, we present a case of a medically free 37-year-old female who developed clinical and histological evidence of pityriasis rosea (PR) after administration of a second-dose vaccination of AZD1222. The first dose of vaccination was administered as Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA (BNT162b2) vaccine. This case is unique in nature as this patient developed AZD1222-induced PR, while some reports in the literature have linked PR to the BNT162b2 vaccine. This patient continued to receive a booster vaccination with BNT162b2 with no reportable side effects.

3.
Cureus ; 13(11): e19351, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34909312

RESUMO

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of an unknown cause that affects multiple organs, most commonly lungs, intrathoracic lymph nodes, eyes, and skin, which accounts between 20% and 25%. However, cutaneous sarcoidosis can present without any systemic involvement in 25% of cases. We present a case of a 53-year-old female patient with cutaneous sarcoidosis with no lung involvement. The patient presented to the family medicine department with non-itchy, tender, erythematous papules occurring at the dorsal part of the hands and the right foot for three months. Skin punch biopsy demonstrated multiple dermal-based nodules consisting of non-necrotizing granulomata. Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme level and a chest radiograph were normal and not consistent with pulmonary sarcoidosis. There are different cutaneous manifestations of cutaneous sarcoidosis and early identification helps in early intervention.

4.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 35(4): 484-94, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21378549

RESUMO

Sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs) of the ovary are relatively uncommon tumors. Diagnosis of SCST rests primarily on the histomorphology of these tumors, and tumors with an atypical or unconventional appearance can pose diagnostic challenges. Previously, we had identified FOXL2 (402C→G) mutation as being characteristic of adult granulosa cell tumors (aGCTs). However, molecular screening for this mutation is not always possible and adds time and cost to the diagnostic process. In this study, we investigated the potential diagnostic use of immunostaining for FOXL2 on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Using a commercially available polyclonal antiserum against FOXL2 protein, immunoexpression of FOXL2 was tested in 501 ovarian tumor samples, including 119 SCSTs, using whole tissue sections and tissue microarrays. Staining was correlated with FOXL2 mutation status. In addition, we compared FOXL2 immunoexpression with that of α-inhibin and calretinin, the 2 traditional immunomarkers of SCST, in a subset of 89 SCSTs. FOXL2 immunostaining was present in 95 of 119 (80%) SCSTs, including >95% of aGCTs, juvenile granulosa cell tumors, fibromas, and sclerosing stromal tumors. Only 50% of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (N=40) expressed FOXL2. One of 11 steroid cell tumors and 3 of 3 female adnexal tumors of probable Wolffian origin showed FOXL2 immunoreactivity, whereas all other non-SCSTs tested (N=368) were negative for FOXL2 expression. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of FOXL2 immunoreactivity for SCST are 80% and 99%, respectively. The FOXL2 (402C→G) mutation was confirmed to be both a sensitive and relatively specific indicator of aGCT. Forty-five of 119 SCSTs were mutation positive. These cases were 39 of 42 (93%) aGCTs, 3 of 40 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, 2 of 5 thecomas, and 1 of 4 (25%) SCSTs of unclassified type. SCSTs harboring a FOXL2 mutation consistently immunoexpressed FOXL2 (44 of 45, 98%), but FOXL2 immunostaining was also seen in many SCSTs that lacked a mutation (49 of 73, 67%). FOXL2 immunostaining showed higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of SCST, compared with α-inhibin and calretinin, and FOXL2 staining was typically more intense in positive cases compared with either α-inhibin or calretinin. In the SCSTs that were negative for FOXL2 expression, α-inhibin and/or calretinin immunostaining yielded positive results. In conclusion, FOXL2 is a relatively sensitive and highly specific marker for SCST. FOXL2 staining is present in almost all SCSTs with a FOXL2 mutation, and also in a majority of SCSTs without a mutation. FOXL2, together with α-inhibin and calretinin, forms an immunomarker panel that will result in positive staining with 1 or more markers in essentially all cases of SCST.


Assuntos
Fatores de Transcrição Forkhead/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ovarianas/metabolismo , Tumores do Estroma Gonadal e dos Cordões Sexuais/metabolismo , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Calbindina 2 , Análise Mutacional de DNA , DNA de Neoplasias/análise , Feminino , Proteína Forkhead Box L2 , Fatores de Transcrição Forkhead/genética , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Inibinas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Mutação Puntual , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Proteína G de Ligação ao Cálcio S100/metabolismo , Tumores do Estroma Gonadal e dos Cordões Sexuais/genética , Tumores do Estroma Gonadal e dos Cordões Sexuais/patologia , Análise Serial de Tecidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA