Unique Case of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm with Two Rare Clonal Abnormalities: Rare JAK2 Exon 12 Mutation and Rare e14a3 (b3a3) BCR/ABL Fusion Transcript.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders divided into Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Ph chromosome-negative MPNs. Co-occurrence of these disease entities is very rare and typically involves presence of common p190 or p210 BCR/ABL fusion transcript (responsible for CML) along with JAK2V617F mutation (most common driver mutation in Ph-negative MPNs). Because of the rarity of such cases, it is not clear if the outcomes are any different in these patients. In this article, we report a unique patient with polycythemia vera driven by a rare complex in-frame deletion-insertion mutation in JAK2 exon 12, and CML driven by uncommon p210 e14a3 (b3a3) BCR/ABL fusion transcript. We describe clinical and laboratory features, bone marrow pathology, treatment, and overall outcome.

Novel hematological parameters for the evaluation of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: the immature platelet and reticulocyte fractions.

New automated hematology analyzers have led to the availability of novel hematological parameters, including the immature platelet fraction (IPF) and the immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), both of potential interest in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). We performed a prospective analysis of 217 patients with MPN, including 32 (15%) with essential thrombocythemia (ET), 43 (20%) with polycythemia vera (PV), and 142 (65%) with myelofibrosis (MF); the IPF and IRF were measured by the Sysmex XN analyzer. As compared to patients with ET, both a higher IPF and IRF were observed among patients with PV and MF. Factors associated with high IPF among patients with PV/ET were male sex, thrombocytopenia, and diagnosis of PV; among patients with MF, they were elevated peripheral blasts, low platelet count, JAK2 V617F mutation, and previous therapy. Factors associated with high IRF among patients with PV/ET were low hemoglobin, high reticulocyte count, and PV diagnosis; among patients with MF, they were peripheral blasts and elevated reticulocytes. The IPF and IRF represent novel parameters in patients with MPN with potential relevant clinical implications. Comparison with healthy subjects and those with secondary polycythemia is needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

A phase 2 study of pracinostat combined with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis.

Although ruxolitinib improves symptoms and splenomegaly in patients with advanced myelofibrosis, whether this agent is truly disease-modifying remains unclear. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) downregulate JAK2 via interference with chaperone function. Pracinostat, a pan-HDACi, has modest single-agent activity in myelofibrosis. We conducted a single-institution, phase 2, investigator-initiated trial of ruxolitinib plus pracinostat (begun after 12 weeks of ruxolitinib) in 25 patients with myelofibrosis, of whom 20 received both agents. Sixteen (80%) patients had objective responses (all 'clinical improvement'). The rate of spleen response (by palpation) was 74%, and that of symptom response 80%. Most responses occurred prior to pracinostat initiation. Three patients experienced improvement in bone marrow fibrosis, and one a near-complete molecular response after two years on study treatment. All patients discontinued pracinostat and are currently off-study. Pracinostat interruptions and dose reductions were frequent, often due to worsening anemia. These findings do not support continued development of pracinostat in myelofibrosis.