RETINAL NONPERFUSION IN THE EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY SEVEN FIELDS COMPARED WITH WIDEFIELD FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY: Correlation and Use of Extrapolation Factor.

BACKGROUND: In previous landmark studies on central retinal vein occlusion, retinal nonperfusion assessments were obtained using 7-field (7F) angiography. The widespread current use of widefield imaging allows better visualization of the peripheral retina and more comprehensive estimation of the total area of nonperfusion. The relationship between nonperfusion measurement of 7F and widefield angiography (WFA) in central retinal vein occlusion has not been studied. We aim to identify the correlation of retinal nonperfusion measured within the 7F and on WFA in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Retinal nonperfusion in participants with central retinal vein occlusion was determined using a 7F Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study template and the concentric rings method. RESULTS: A total of 153 eyes were included. Pearson correlation test showed a near-perfect positive, linear correlation between the nonperfusion found in the 7F and total retinal nonperfusion on WFA (0.985 95% CI [0.793, 0.999]) The regression line equation for nonperfusion on 7F and WFA was y = 37 + 3.2x. Eyes with 0 disk areas (DA), >0 DA to 10 DA and >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7-fields had on average 23 DA 95% CI (19.20, 27.06), 45 DA 95% CI (35.75, 55.18), and 115 DA 95% CI (88.89, 142.05) on widefield respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a positive and linear relationship between nonperfusion measured by 7F and WFA in central retinal vein occlusion with more than 3-times the amount of nonperfusion identified on WFA. Despite <10 DA no areas of nonperfusion on 7F, there is typically at least 35 DA of nonperfusion on WFA whereas eyes with >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7F had at least 88 DA on WFA.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF INTRAVITREAL AFLIBERCEPT USING A TREAT-AND-EXTEND REGIMEN FOR NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: The ARIES Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration with intravitreal aflibercept treat-and-extend (T&E) can reduce treatment burden. ARIES assessed whether intravitreal aflibercept early-start T&E was noninferior to late-start T&E. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, Phase 3b/4 study that included treatment-naïve patients aged ≥50 years with the best-corrected visual acuity 73-25 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and active choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD. Patients received 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept at Week (W) 0, W4, W8, and W16. At W16, patients were randomized 1:1 to early-start (2W interval adjustments) or late-start T&E (8W intervals until W48 then 2W interval adjustments). Primary endpoint: the best-corrected visual acuity change from randomization to W104. RESULTS: Two-hundred seventy-one patients were randomized. The mean (SD) best-corrected visual acuity at baseline was 60.2 (12.1; early-T&E) and 61.3 (10.8; late-T&E) letters. The mean (SD) best-corrected visual acuity change (W16-104) was -2.1 (11.4) versus -0.4 (8.4) letters (early-T&E vs. late-T&E; least-squares mean difference: -2.0; 95% confidence interval: -4.75 to 0.71; P = 0.0162 for noninferior); +4.3 (13.4) versus +7.9 (11.9) letters (W0-104). The mean (SD) number of injections was 12.0 (2.3) versus 13.0 (1.8). From baseline to W104, 93.4% and 96.2% maintained best-corrected visual acuity; the mean (SD) central retinal thickness change was -161.6 (135.6) µm and -158.6 (125.1) µm. The last injection interval (W104) was ≥12W for 47.2% and 51.9% of patients. CONCLUSION: Outcomes were similar between patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with an intravitreal aflibercept early-T&E or late-T&E regimen after initial dosing, with one injection difference over 2 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02581891. Supplemental Digital Contents (files 1 http://links.lww.com/IAE/B419).

Mapping From Visual Acuity to EQ-5D, EQ-5D With Vision Bolt-On, and VFQ-UI in Patients With Macular Edema in the LEAVO Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Mappings to convert clinical measures to preference-based measures of health such as the EQ-5D-3L are sometimes required in cost-utility analyses. We developed mappings to convert best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) to the EQ-5D-3L, the EQ-5D-3L with a vision bolt-on (EQ-5D V), and the Visual Functioning Questionnaire-Utility Index (VFQ-UI) in patients with macular edema caused by central retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: We used data from Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in vein occlusion (LEAVO), which is a phase-3 randomized controlled trial comparing ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab in 463 patients with observations at 6 time points. We estimated adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models consisting of 1 to 4 distributions (components) using BCVA in each eye, age, and sex to predict utility within the components and BCVA as a determinant of component membership. We compared model fit using mean error, mean absolute error, root mean square error, Akaike information criteria, Bayesian information criteria, and visual inspection of mean predicted and observed utilities and cumulative distribution functions. RESULTS: Mean utility scores were 0.82 for the EQ-5D-3L, 0.79 for the EQ-5D V, and 0.88 for the VFQ-UI. The best-fitting models for the EQ-5D and EQ-5D V had 2 components (with means of approximately 0.44 and 0.85), and the best-fitting model for VFQ-UI had 3 components (with means of approximately 0.95, 0.74, and 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Models with multiple components better predict utility than those with single components. This article provides a valuable addition to the literature, in which previous mappings in visual acuity have been limited to linear regressions, resulting in unfounded assumptions about the distribution of the dependent variable.

Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of severe sight impairment in people with diabetes. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy has been managed by panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for the past 40 years. We report the 1 year safety and efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept. METHODS: In this phase 2b, single-blind, non-inferiority trial (CLARITY), adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 1 or 2 diabetes and previously untreated or post-laser treated active proliferative diabetic retinopathy were recruited from 22 UK ophthalmic centres. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to repeated intravitreal aflibercept (2 mg/0·05 mL at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, and from week 12 patients were reviewed every 4 weeks and aflibercept injections were given as needed) or PRP standard care (single spot or mutlispot laser at baseline, fractionated fortnightly thereafter, and from week 12 patients were assessed every 8 weeks and treated with PRP as needed) for 52 weeks. Randomisation was by minimisation with a web-based computer generated system. Primary outcome assessors were masked optometrists. The treating ophthalmologists and participants were not masked. The primary outcome was defined as a change in best-corrected visual acuity at 52 weeks with a linear mixed-effect model that estimated adjusted treatment effects at both 12 weeks and 52 weeks, having excluded fluctuations in best corrected visual acuity owing to vitreous haemorrhage. This modified intention-to-treat analysis was reapplied to the per protocol participants. The non-inferiority margin was prespecified as -5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. Safety was assessed in all participants. This trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, number 32207582. FINDINGS: We recruited 232 participants (116 per group) between Aug 22, 2014 and Nov 30, 2015. 221 participants (112 in aflibercept group, 109 in PRP group) contributed to the modified intention-to-treat model, and 210 participants (104 in aflibercept group and 106 in PRP group) within per protocol. Aflibercept was non-inferior and superior to PRP in both the modified intention-to-treat population (mean best corrected visual acuity difference 3·9 letters [95% CI 2·3-5·6], p<0·0001) and the per-protocol population (4·0 letters [2·4-5·7], p<0·0001). There were no safety concerns. The 95% CI adjusted difference between groups was more than the prespecified acceptable margin of -5 letters at both 12 weeks and 52 weeks. INTERPRETATION: Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy who were treated with intravitreal aflibercept had an improved outcome at 1 year compared with those treated with PRP standard care. FUNDING: The Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research partnership.

Genome-wide association studies for diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are sight-threatening complications of diabetes mellitus and leading causes of adult-onset blindness worldwide. Genetic risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) have been described previously, but have been difficult to replicate between studies, which have often used composite phenotypes and been conducted in different populations. This study aims to identify genetic risk factors for DME and PDR as separate complications in Australians of European descent with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Caucasian Australians with type 2 diabetes were evaluated in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to compare 270 DME cases and 176 PDR cases with 435 non-retinopathy controls. All participants were genotyped by SNP array and after data cleaning, cases were compared to controls using logistic regression adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: The top ranked SNP for DME was rs1990145 (p = 4.10 × 10- 6, OR = 2.02 95%CI [1.50, 2.72]) on chromosome 2. The top-ranked SNP for PDR was rs918519 (p = 3.87 × 10- 6, OR = 0.35 95%CI [0.22, 0.54]) on chromosome 5. A trend towards association was also detected at two SNPs reported in the only other reported GWAS of DR in Caucasians; rs12267418 near MALRD1 (p = 0.008) in the DME cohort and rs16999051 in the diabetes gene PCSK2 (p = 0.007) in the PDR cohort. CONCLUSION: This study has identified loci of interest for DME and PDR, two common ocular complications of diabetes. These findings require replication in other Caucasian cohorts with type 2 diabetes and larger cohorts will be required to identify genetic loci with statistical confidence. There is considerable overlap in the patient cohorts with each retinopathy subtype, complicating the search for genes that contribute to PDR and DME biology.

Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg for the Treatment of Macular Edema Resulting from Uncommon Causes: Twelve-Month Findings from PROMETHEUS.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adult patients with macular edema (ME) resulting from any cause other than diabetes, retinal vein occlusion, or neovascular age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: A phase 3, 12-month, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-eight eligible patients aged ≥18 years. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 118) or sham (n = 60) at baseline and month 1. From month 2, patients in both arms received open-label individualized ranibizumab treatment based on disease activity. A preplanned subgroup analysis was conducted on the primary end point on 5 predefined baseline ME etiologies (inflammatory/post-uveitis, pseudophakic or aphakic, central serous chorioretinopathy, idiopathic, and miscellaneous). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) from baseline to month 2 (primary end point) and month 12 and safety over 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, 156 patients (87.6%) completed the study. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms. Overall, ranibizumab showed superior efficacy versus sham from baseline to month 2 (least squares mean BCVA, +5.7 letters vs. +2.9 letters; 1-sided P = 0.0111), that is, a treatment effect (TE) of +2.8 letters. The mean BCVA gain from baseline to month 12 was 9.6 letters with ranibizumab. The TE at month 2 was variable in the 5 predefined etiology subgroups, ranging from >5-letter gain to 0.5-letter loss. The safety findings were consistent with the well-established safety profile of ranibizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The primary end point was met and ranibizumab showed superiority in BCVA gain over sham in treating ME due to uncommon causes, with a TE of +2.8 letters versus sham at month 2. At month 12, the mean BCVA gain was high (9.6 letters) in the ranibizumab arm; however, the TE was observed to be variable across the different etiology subgroups, reaching a >1-line TE in BCVA in patients with ME resulting from inflammatory conditions/post-uveitis or after cataract surgery. Overall, ranibizumab was well tolerated with no new safety findings up to month 12.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RANIBIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION DUE TO UNCOMMON CAUSE: Twelve-Month Results of the MINERVA Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adult patients with choroidal neovascularization because of an uncommon cause enrolled in the 12-month MINERVA study. METHODS: In this Phase III, double-masked study, adult (≥18 years) patients (N = 178) were randomized 2:1 to receive either ranibizumab (n = 119) or sham (n = 59) at baseline and, if needed, at Month 1 and open-label individualized ranibizumab from Month 2. Best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to Month 2 (primary endpoint) and Month 12, treatment exposure, and safety over 12 months were reported. Subgroup analysis was conducted on five predefined choroidal neovascularization etiologies (angioid streak, postinflammatory, central serous chorioretinopathy, idiopathic, and miscellaneous). RESULTS: Ranibizumab showed superior efficacy versus sham from baseline to Month 2 (adjusted least-squares mean best-corrected visual acuity: +9.5 vs. -0.4 letters; P < 0.001). At Month 12, the mean best-corrected visual acuity change was +11.0 letters (ranibizumab) and +9.3 letters (sham). Across the 5 subgroups, the treatment effect ranged from +5.0 to +14.6 letters. The mean number of ranibizumab injections was 5.8 (ranibizumab arm) with no new ocular or nonocular adverse events. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg resulted in clinically significant treatment effect versus sham at Month 2. Overall, ranibizumab was effective in treating choroidal neovascularization of various etiologies with no new safety findings.

Identifying Predictors of Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration through Discriminant and Principal Component Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: AURA was an observational study that monitored visual acuity outcomes following ranibizumab use in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients over 2 years. The aim of this analysis was to identify factors that were predictive of visual acuity outcomes in AURA. METHODS: The correlation between the baseline characteristics, the use of resources and the visual acuity outcomes in AURA was explored using principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). The response variables analysed were mean change in visual acuity over 2 years (analysed via PCA) and no decline in visual acuity at 2 years compared with baseline (analysed via PLS-DA). RESULTS: The AURA dataset comprised 2,227 patients and 132 variables. Using PCA and PLS-DA, we found that the number of ranibizumab injections, clinic and monitoring visits, number of optical coherence tomography scans and ophthalmoscopies correlated with a change in visual acuity at Years 1 and 2, and are therefore key drivers of treatment success. CONCLUSION: This is a novel approach to graphically explore relationships between multiple correlated covariates and outcomes in real-life ophthalmology studies. It identified a number of variables that are positively linked with treatment outcomes.

Genome-wide association study for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy reveals association with genetic variation near the GRB2 gene.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Diabetic retinopathy is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and can lead to blindness. A genetic component, in addition to traditional risk factors, has been well described although strong genetic factors have not yet been identified. Here, we aimed to identify novel genetic risk factors for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy using a genome-wide association study. METHODS: Retinopathy was assessed in white Australians with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Genome-wide association analysis was conducted for comparison of cases of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (n = 336) with diabetic controls with no retinopathy (n = 508). Top ranking single nucleotide polymorphisms were typed in a type 2 diabetes replication cohort, a type 1 diabetes cohort and an Indian type 2 cohort. A mouse model of proliferative retinopathy was used to assess differential expression of the nearby candidate gene GRB2 by immunohistochemistry and quantitative western blot. RESULTS: The top ranked variant was rs3805931 with p = 2.66 × 10(-7), but no association was found in the replication cohort. Only rs9896052 (p = 6.55 × 10(-5)) was associated with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in both the type 2 (p = 0.035) and the type 1 (p = 0.041) replication cohorts, as well as in the Indian cohort (p = 0.016). The study-wide meta-analysis reached genome-wide significance (p = 4.15 × 10(-8)). The GRB2 gene is located downstream of this variant and a mouse model of retinopathy showed increased GRB2 expression in the retina. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Genetic variation near GRB2 on chromosome 17q25.1 is associated with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Several genes in this region are promising candidates and in particular GRB2 is upregulated during retinal stress and neovascularisation.

Diagnostic accuracy of disorganization of the retinal inner layers in detecting macular capillary non-perfusion in diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) is thought to represent retinal capillary non-perfusion (CNP) in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. This study was designed to evaluate the ability of DRIL to accurately predict CNP. DESIGN: Retrospective masked reliability and diagnostic accuracy study performed in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK SAMPLES: Retinal images of patients with diabetic retinopathy METHODS: The OCT images from 90 separate areas of angiographically confirmed perfused and non-perfused areas of the macula from 37 eyes of 31 patients were anonymized and coded. Two masked graders independently graded these OCT scans for the presence or absence of DRIL to determine the intergrader reliability. The diagnostic accuracy of DRIL in identifying CNP was evaluated from the results obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of DRIL in accurately detecting CNP RESULTS: The intergrader agreement was high with a Cohen's kappa of 0.909. DRIL was present in 84.4% (38/45) of non-perfused retina and none in perfused retina (0/45). The sensitivity and specificity of DRIL in detecting angiographic evidence of CNP was 84.4% and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 86.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of DRIL is a reliable predictor of areas of macular CNP. However, DRIL is not a universal finding of non-perfusion, with some cases exhibiting absence of DRIL despite angiographic CNP.

What is new in the management of wet age-related macular degeneration?

INTRODUCTION OR BACKGROUND: The hallmark of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is choroidal neovascularization (CNV). The key cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of CNV is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Since 2005, antiVEGF therapy has revolutionized the management of this condition. SOURCES OF DATA: A systematic computerized literature search was conducted on PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/). AREAS OF AGREEMENT: AntiVEGF therapy has resulted in improvement in visual function and performance. Currently, practitioners are spoilt for choice of these agents. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Bevacizumab is unlicensed for intraocular use but has a better market share than ranibizumab in the treatment of wet AMD as it is approximately 40 times cheaper than ranibizumab, if aliquoted into smaller doses for intraocular use. This has stirred up questions on indemnity, safety, dosing, treatment regimen and quality control, despite the fact that well-designed clinical trials have shown that both drugs are equally effective. Another dilemma for the physicians is the choice of treatment regimens with antiVEGF agents that include fixed dosing, optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided re-treatment, treat and extend or a combination of proactive and reactive dosing. Real-life outcomes of physician-dependent OCT-guided re-treatment with these agents are inferior to outcomes reported in clinical trials. GROWING POINTS: A recently food and drug administration-approved antiVEGF agent, aflibercept, is rapidly becoming a popular choice as well-designed randomized clinical trials indicate that eight weekly fixed dosing of aflibercept is non-inferior to monthly ranibizumab. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Options for reducing the frequency of repeated intravitreal injections are being explored. Combination therapy with photodynamic therapy and epimacular brachytherapy seem scientifically plausible due to their synergistic effects. However, so far the results on these combinations have not shown any superior visual outcomes to antiVEGF monotherapy, and the practicalities of delivering these therapies are formidable. So, research into other novel therapeutic approaches such as pigment epithelium-derived factor and designed ankyrin repeat proteins are gaining momentum.

Corticosteroid intravitreal implants vs. ranibizumab for the treatment of vitreoretinal disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three long-acting corticosteroid implants are now available for the treatment of retinal disease, offering control of macular edema and inflammation for between 6 months and up to 3 years. This review evaluates their efficacy and side-effect profile in comparison with the antivascular endothelial growth factor agent ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, pseudophakic macular edema, and uveitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Trials of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema have demonstrated excellent efficacy without serious safety concerns to date. Fluocinolone acetonide implants can be considered, but have a high risk of cataract and sequelae from intraocular pressure rise. In retinal vein occlusion, both ranibizumab and Ozurdex have been shown to be effective, although their relative efficacy has not been determined in head-to-head clinical trials. In pseudophakic and uveitic macular edema, steroid implants are probably the first choice therapy, although there is evidence that ranibizumab is effective. For choroidal neovascularization secondary to inflammatory disease, ranibizumab is indicated, whereas Retisert has been shown to reduce the risk of uveitis relapse. SUMMARY: In diabetic macular edema, ranibizumab has shown greater efficacy with fewer side-effects than steroid implants. Both ranibizumab and steroid implants can be considered in retinal vein occlusion, but trials are awaited to determine their relative efficacy.

Outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion in patients with poor baseline visual acuity.

OBJECTIVE: To report the visual outcomes of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in patients with baseline visual acuity of ≤23 ETDRS letters vision. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. METHODS: This is a single-institution study. A total of 173 eyes from 173 patients who had completed 3 consecutive monthly anti-VEGF injections for macular edema secondary CRVO and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤23 ETDRS letters were included. The main outcome measures were visual acuity at month 3 and month 12. RESULTS: At month 3, BCVA increased to 34.1 ETDRS letters (95% CI, 30.7-37.5), with a gain of 25.0 letters (95% CI, 22.0-28.5; p < 0.001). The mean central subfield thickness decreased by 519 µm (95% CI, 475.5-567.0; p < 0.001). Most patients (67.6%) gained >15 ETDRS letters. A total of 160 patients were followed up for 12 months, and the mean BCVA was 31.2 ETDRS letters (95% CI, 27.5-34.9) at the end of this period. A third of eyes that did not respond (<5-letter gain) after a single injection experienced a 15-letter or more improvement after 3 consecutive injections. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with CRVO and poor baseline visual acuity results in significant visual improvement, and moderate improvement is still noted despite a poor response after a single injection.

Visual Outcomes Associated With Patterns of Macular Edema Resolution in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in Vein Occlusion (LEAVO) Trial.

IMPORTANCE: It is unclear how visual outcomes vary between patterns of macular edema (ME) resolution in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). OBJECTIVE: To assess best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes at 100 weeks based on macular fluid resolution patterns by 52 and 100 weeks among patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for CRVO-related ME. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Post hoc analysis of the prospective, 3-arm, double-masked, randomized noninferiority trial Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in Vein Occlusion (LEAVO), which evaluated intravitreal aflibercept (2.0 mg/0.05 mL), bevacizumab (1.25-mg/0.05 mL), or ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) over 100 weeks in adult patients (18 years and older) with CRVO-related ME with BCVA Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 19 to 78 in the study eye (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/400 to 20/32, respectively) from December 2014 to December 2016 at 44 UK National Health Service ophthalmology departments. A total of 140 of 154 eyes were randomized to aflibercept, 144 of 154 randomized to bevacizumab, and 141 of 155 randomized to ranibizumab. Data were analyzed from January 2019 to March 2019. EXPOSURES: Persistent ME included eyes with central subfield thickness (CST) 320 µm or greater, and persistently dry macula (no ME) included eyes with CST less than 320 µm at 52 and 100 weeks. Recurrent ME included eyes that did not meet the criteria for persistently dry or wet. If CST was missing, the closest intervening visit was carried forward. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adjusted mean BCVA at 100 weeks. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the 425 included participants was 69.2 (12.7) years, and 243 participants (57.2%) were men. A total of 425 eyes from 425 participants were included. By 100 weeks, 117 eyes (28.5%) were persistently dry, 44 (10.7%) were persistently wet (with ME), and 250 (60.8%) had recurrent ME. Persistent ME at 100 weeks was associated with worse VA compared with dry macula (adjusted difference, -10.98 ETDRS letters; 95% CI, -16.19 to -5.76; P < .001) and recurrent ME (adjusted difference, -5.39 letters; 95% CI, -10.15 to -0.64; P = .03). By 52 weeks, individuals with persistent ME also had poorer 100-week BCVA compared with individuals with dry macula (adjusted difference, -7.39; 95% CI, -11.72 to -3.05; P < .001) and recurrent ME (adjusted difference, -3.92; 95% CI, -8.05 to 0.20; P = .06). By 100 weeks, more eyes treated with bevacizumab had persistently wet macula than those treated with aflibercept (26 of 140 [18.6%] vs 7 of 134 [5.2%]; difference, 13.3%; 95% CI, 5.9 to 20.8; P < .001) or ranibizumab (11 of 137 [8%]; difference, 10.5%; 95% CI, 2.7 to 18.4; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that attempts should be made to maintain persistently fluid-free macula for optimal visual acuity outcomes.

Long-term follow-up of a case of posterior microphthalmos (PRSS56) with hyperautofluorescent retinal pigment epithelial deposits.

PURPOSE: To report a case of posterior microphthalomos (PM) related to PRSS56 gene mutation with long term follow up with multimodal imaging findings. METHODS: Single retrospective case report. RESULTS: A 43-year old male patient presented in 2009 with bilateral reduced vision. Clinical examination and multimodal imaging showed features consistent with posterior microphthalmos with prominent bilateral horizontal papillomacular retinal folds. Posterior pole hyperautofluorescent RPE deposits were present. Gradual worsening of visual acuity and rod and cone photoreceptor function more so on the left was demonstrated during the 8 years of follow up. CONCLUSION: Hyperautofluorescent RPE deposits may occur in patients with posterior microphthalmos and such patient's may experience only gradual disease progression over long term follow up.

The clinical relevance of ultra-widefield angiography findings in patients with central retinal vein occlusion and macular oedema receiving anti-VEGF therapy.

AIMS: To report, using ultra-widefield angiography (UWFA) the area, distribution, and change in retinal capillary nonperfusion (RCNP) at baseline and 100 weeks in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) receiving anti-VEGF for macula oedema. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal multi-centre cohort study. Adults with CRVO treated with anti-VEGF therapy for macular oedema underwent UWFA at baseline and week-100. The area, distribution, and change in total, peripheral and posterior pole RCNP were determined. RESULTS: Of 153 eyes at baseline, mean area of RCNP was 34.3DA and 12 (7.8%) had ≥75DA RCNP. More than 10DA RCNP was present in the temporal periphery in 75.8% of eyes vs. 10.5% in the nasal periphery. At week-100, mean RCNP was 42.1DA with a median change from baseline of 3.3DA 95% CI [0.4, 7.3]; p < 0.01. Of 146 eyes with ≤10DA of posterior pole RCNP at baseline, 16/146 (11.0%) progressed to >10DA at week-100. These eyes had a median increase in total RCNP of 69.7DA [95% CI 27.2-85.4] vs 0DA [0.0-1.4]; p < 0.001 for those who did not, and two developed neovascular glaucoma. Larger baseline area of RCNP and history of glaucoma were risk factors for posterior pole RCNP developing. CONCLUSIONS: With UWFA, significant baseline RCNP was identified in the majority of CRVO patients, notably in the temporal periphery, but large increases over 100 weeks were uncommon. Development of >10DA posterior pole RCNP is a marker for widespread RCNP and in such cases the risk of anterior segment neovascularisation is not abolished by concomitant anti-VEGF therapy.

One-year real-life results on effect of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular oedema switched from ranibizumab.

PURPOSE: To assess visual and optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea®) for diabetic macular oedema in patients switched from intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis®). DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety eyes (of 67 patients) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included. METHODS: This is a retrospective, real-life, cohort study. Each patient had visual acuity measurements and optical coherence tomography scans performed at baseline and 12 months after the first injection of aflibercept was given. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured visual acuities in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, central foveal thickness and macular volume at baseline and at 12 months after the first aflibercept injection was given. RESULTS: Ninety switched eyes were included in this study. The mean (standard deviation) visual acuity was 63 (15.78) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. At baseline, the mean (standard deviation) central foveal thickness was 417.7 (158.4) µm and the mean macular volume was 9.96 (2.44) mm3. Mean change in visual acuity was +4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p = 0.0053). The mean change in macular volume was -1.53 mm3 in SW group (p = 0.21), while the change in central foveal thickness was -136.8 µm (p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in the switched group at 12 months after commencing treatment with aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema.