Clinical considerations on the retroperitoneal liposarcomas.

AIM: It presents a clinical case of undifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma with 5 years' recurrence from the first operation for the rarity of the occurrence, the problems related to surgery and complementary therapeutic approach. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Male patient aged 73 was operated for removal of retroperitoneal mass with involvement of the right kidney at the Second University of Naples in the 2003. In accordance with the interdisciplinary board, complementary therapy is not indicated and follow-up program. The successive controls were negative until at least 2007. Reoperation for recurrence in 2008 for the presence of massive bone formation occupying a large part in the right half of the abdomen at the sub-hepatic level. In both cases histological examination showed undifferentiated liposarcoma. DISCUSSION: It is of unknown etiology and only 25% occurs in well-differentiated cells are also more than 100 histological subtypes, 85% are malignant. The most affected is the male sex and from the beginning looks like malignancy. The trend of growth in general is slow, and in most cases tends to recur over time. The role of chemotherapy and radiation therapy is controversial. CONCLUSIONS: The peculiarity of our case is higher than the average survival despite advanced age and presence of recurrence. This confirms the importance of surgical treatment, thus offering the patient a chance of better long-term survival.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis complicated with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in a young man who is a healthy cyclist.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), formerly known as Churg-Strauss syndrome, is a rare systemic vasculitis. Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) is a rare complication of EGPA. We report a case of a 60-year-old man, who is also a skilled cyclist, who was hospitalized to investigate a symptomatology that had arisen over the previous months and worsened in the last few weeks, to the point of limiting normal everyday activities. The physical examination revealed the presence of livedo reticularis of the four limbs, purpura of the lower limbs, arthritis of the ankles, and low-grade fever; the patient showed intense asthenia, loss of appetite, retrosternal heartburn, and a scarcely pharmacologically controlled asthma. He also reported weight loss (about 5 kg in the last 6 months). Rapidly progressing renal failure was observed with hyper-eosinophilia (4.7 thousand/µL eosinophils, 44% of total leukocytes), pulmonary opacities on chest computed tomography (CT), and sinusitis on CT of the facial massif. The search for antibodies directed against neutrophil cytoplasm (ANCA) revealed a high level of pANCA (pANCA ++, ELISA anti-MPO 666 UI/ml), associated with an increment of inflammation indicators. The induction therapy was high-dosage intravenous glucorticoids and cyclophosphamide, to improve the short and long-term prognosis. After 7 months of treatment, the patient reported a considerable improvement of the symptoms, which at that point did not necessitate pharmacological interventions. The eosinophils value was 0 cells/mm³, the inflammation indexes were back to the norm, and the renal function appeared significantly improved.

[Seroconversion and immune response after anti-HBV vaccination in patients on chronic hemodialysis: comparison of two vaccines]. / Sieroconversione e risposta immunitaria dopo vaccinazione anti-HBV in pazienti sottoposti a trattamento emodialitico cronico: confronto tra due diversi protocolli di vaccinazione.

ESRD patients on hemodialysis (HD) have a high risk of HBV infections. Primary prevention through vaccination is a first choice to reduce the morbidity from HBV. Prevention can be accomplished by two types of vaccines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the serological response to HBV vaccination in a population of HD patients who were randomized to Fendrix or Engerix B according to common administration protocols. Ninety-two HD patients were randomized to Fendrix or Engerix B immunization protocols. Patients in the Fendrix arm received four intramuscular administrations of 20 micron g, while patients in the Engerix arm received three intramuscular administrations of 40 micron g with an optional booster dose at two months from the last administration in nonresponders. The seroconversion rates were higher in the Fendrix group than the Engerix group, with faster responses, higher titers and longer duration of immune memory. Fendrix seems to be more effective than the older vaccine, Engerix, especially in patients at high infection risk like those making up our study population. Other crucial factors for good outcomes in patient immunization were biological and dialysis age. This underlines the importance of early immunization protocols such as already discussed by many nephrologists.