Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Intern Med ; 58(2): 159-166, 2019 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30210115

RESUMO

Objective Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently a standard procedure, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are most commonly used to treat post-ESD ulcers. Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), reportedly inhibits gastric acid secretions more effectively than PPIs. Combination therapy of a PPI plus rebamipide is effective for treating larger ulcers. Our goal was to evaluate the effects of vonoprazan plus rebamipide compared to esomeprazole plus rebamipide for the treatment of post-ESD ulcers. Methods First, vonoprazan plus rebamipide (V group) or esomeprazole plus rebamipide (E group) was orally administered to subjects for eight weeks. We then evaluated the ulcer healing process at four and eight weeks after the procedure using a gastric ulcer stage system and by measuring the ulcer size. Patients A total of 84 patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms between September 2015 and December 2017 in Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital were included in this randomized controlled trial. Results The ulcer scar rates at week 4 in the V group (n=43) and E groups (n=39) were 20.9% and 15.4%, while those at week 8 were 90.7% and 92.3%, respectively. The ulcer reduction rates at week 4 in the V and E groups were 94.6% and 93.8%, and those at week 8 were 99.7% and 99.3%, respectively. The ulcer scar rates and reduction rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Combination therapy consisting of vonoprazan plus rebamipide was not superior to that of esomeprazole plus rebamipide for post-ESD ulcer healing (UMIN000019516).


Assuntos
Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Esomeprazol/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Úlcera Gástrica/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alanina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Úlcera Gástrica/etiologia , Úlcera Gástrica/patologia , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
J Rural Med ; 11(2): 41-45, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27928455

RESUMO

Objectives: Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently a standard procedure. ESD enables en-bloc resection of large lesions, while inducing larger artificial ulcers to a greater extent than conventional procedures. Several studies have reported that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) prevent delayed bleeding and expedite the artificial ulcer healing process. Esomeprazole, an S-isomer of omeprazole, is reportedly one of strongest inhibitors of gastric acid secretion. Previous studies have examined the effectiveness of esomeprazole. Our goal was to verify the effects of esomeprazole on artificial ulcers in a prospective study. Methods: A total of 185 patients underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms at our hospital between January 2013 and June 2015. Among these 185 patients, 49 post-ESD scar lesions were included in this prospective trial. First, 20 mg esomeprazole was orally administered to all subjects before and after the procedure. We then evaluated the delayed bleeding rate and ulcer scarring rates at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the procedure by using a gastric ulcer stage system. Results: There was one case of delayed bleeding (2.0%). Regardless of Helicobacter pylori infection status, ulcer scarring rates at weeks 4 and 8 were respectively 28.6% (14/49) and 98% (48/49). Conclusions: Our results suggest that oral administration of esomeprazole alone may be sufficient for prompt healing of artificial gastric ulcers induced by ESD (UMIN000009367).

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA