Minilaparotomy vs. laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of length of hospital stay.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare length of hospital stay for minilaparotomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large integrated health care delivery system. PATIENTS: Women >18 years of age undergoing laparoscopic or minilaparotomy hysterectomy because of benign indications from June 2009 through January 2010. INTERVENTION: Hysterectomy via minilaparotomy or laparoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records were reviewed for outcomes of interest including length of stay and surgical and demographic data. Parametric and non-parametric analyses were used to compare the 2 groups. The study was powered to detect a difference of 8 hours in length of stay. Two hundred sixty-three cases were identified as hysterectomy via minilaparotomy (n = 100) or laparoscopy (n = 163). The laparoscopy group demonstrated a significantly shorter mean (SD) length of stay (19 [14] hours vs. 42 [20] hours; p < .001) and less blood loss (126 [140] mL vs. 241 [238] mL; p < .001). The minilaparotomy group experienced a shorter procedure time (113 [47] minutes vs. 197 [124] minutes; p < .001). There was no difference between the groups insofar as patient morbidity including intraoperative and postoperative complications, emergency visits, readmissions, or repeat operations. CONCLUSION: Compared with minilaparotomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with shorter length of hospital stay, longer operating time, and no increased patient morbidity.

Pregnancy outcomes following 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic diagnosis in couples with balanced reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.

OBJECTIVE: To report live birth rates (LBR) and total aneuploidy rates in a series of patients with balanced translocations who pursued in vitro fertilization (IVF)-preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cycles. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Genetic testing reference laboratory. PATIENT(S): Seventy-four couples who underwent IVF-PGD due to a parental translocation. INTERVENTION(S): IVF cycles and embryo biopsies were performed by referring clinics. Biopsy samples were sent to a single reference lab for PGD for the translocation plus 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening with the use of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): LBR per biopsy cycle, aneuploidy rate, embryo transfer (ET) rate, miscarriage rate. RESULT(S): The LBR per IVF biopsy cycle was 38%. LBR for patients reaching ET was 52%. Clinical miscarriage rate was 10%. Despite a mean age of 33.8 years and mean of 7 embryos biopsied, there was a 30% chance for no chromosomally normal embryos. Maternal age >35 years, day 3 biopsy, and having fewer than five embryos available for biopsy increased the risk of no ET. CONCLUSION(S): IVF-PGD for translocation and aneuploidy screening had good clinical outcomes. Patients carrying a balanced translocation who are considering IVF-PGD should be aware of the high risk of no ET, particularly in women ≥35 years old.