Clinical scoring system: a valuable tool for decision making in cases of acute appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: Decision making in cases of acute appendicitis poses a clinical challenge specially in developing countries where advanced radiological investigations do not appear cost effective and so clinical parameters remain the mainstay of diagnosis. The aim of our study was to devise a scoring system from our local database and test its accuracy in the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis. METHODS: Clinical data from 401 patients having undergone appendectomy were collected to identify predictive factors that distinguished those with appendicitis from those who had a negative appendectomy. Ten such factors were identified and using Bayesian probability a weight was assigned to each and the results summated to get an overall score. A cut-off point was identified to separate patients for surgery and those for observation. The scoring system was then retrospectively applied to a second population of 99 patients in order to compare suggested actions (derived from the scoring system) to those actually taken by surgeons. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the level of decision was then calculated. RESULTS: Of the 99 patients, the method suggested immediate surgery for 65 patients, 63 of whom had acute appendicitis (3.1% diagnostic error rate). Of the 33 patients in whom the score suggested active observation, 18 had appendicitis. The accuracy of our scoring system was 82%. The method had a sensitivity of 78%, specificity 89% and a positive predictive value of 97%. The negative appendectomy rate determined by our study was 7% and the perforation rate 13%. CONCLUSION: Scoring system developed from a local database can work effectively in routine practice as an adjunct to surgical decision making in questionable cases of appendicitis.

Effect of blood transfusion on outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for exocrine tumour of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion is thought to have an immunosuppressive effect. The aims of this study were to examine survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving blood transfusion in association with pancreaticoduodenectomy, and to define preoperative risk factors for subsequent transfusion. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a prospective database of patients with exocrine tumours of the head of the pancreas who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy between 1998 and 2003. Clinical data, transfusion records and preoperative laboratory values were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for exocrine tumours in the pancreatic head. Of these, 140 (47.6 per cent) received a blood transfusion. Their median survival was 18 months, compared with 24 months for those who did not have a transfusion (P = 0.036). Postoperative transfusion, margin status and node stage were independent predictors of survival. Age and preoperative total bilirubin and haemoglobin levels were the only preoperative factors that correlated with transfusion. CONCLUSION: In patients with exocrine tumours of the pancreas, blood transfusion should be avoided when possible. Preoperative risk factors can identify patients who are likely to require transfusion and would therefore benefit most from blood conservation methods.

Surgical resection and high dose rate intraoperative radiation therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

For intra-pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer, surgical resection is technically difficult and must be aggressive to achieve a high rate of negative resection margins. Resection with clear margins can be curative, particularly for those patients with true anastomotic recurrence. HDR-IORT is a safe, feasible, versatile, logistically sound modality that is highly reliable in delivering radiation to at-risk surgical margins in the pelvis. Despite surgery and IORT, overall local failure rates in this population are 33 to 50 percent. The most important prognostic variable is the state of surgical resection margins. At our institution, in patients with negative and positive resection margins the 2-year actuarial local recurrence rates are 33 percent versus 73 percent and 5-year survival rates are 51 percent versus 16 percent, respectively. On subset analysis, the most favorable outcome was seen in patients with true anastomotic recurrences (78 percent 5-year survival).