Predictive Value of the Naples Prognostic Score on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Revascularized via Percutaneous Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the third most common clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis after coronary artery disease and stroke. Despite successful endovascular treatment (EVT), mortality and morbidity rates still remain higher in patients with PAD. Naples prognostic score (NPS) is a novel scoring system, reflects the patient's nutritional and immunological statuses as well as systemic inflammatory responses. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between NPS and long-term outcomes in patients with PAD. METHODS: The population of this retrospective study consisted of 629 PAD patients who underwent EVT at Kafkas University Hospital between 2020 and 2023. For each patient, the NPS was calculated and then patients were divided into 3 groups based on their NPS. The primary end point of the study was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular (MACEs) and limb events (MALEs), that is, all-cause death or development of critical limb ischemia with consequent amputation. RESULTS: Of a total of 629 patients, 62 were classified into group 0 (NPS 0), 315 into group 1 (NPS 1 or 2), and 252 into group 2 (NPS 3 or 4). The distribution of patients' baseline characteristics, angiographic features and MACEs and MALEs according to the NPS groups was analyzed. Significant adverse outcomes differences were observed among the 3 groups (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, lowest preprocedure ankle-brachial index, left ventricular ejection fraction and NPS (hazard ratio 1.916, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.530-2.398, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of MACE whereas diabetes mellitus, presence of previous PAD, hemoglobin level, in-hospital acute thrombotic occlusion and NPS (odds ratio 1.963, 95% CI 1.489-2.588, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of MALE. CONCLUSIONS: The inflammatory and nutritional state reflected by NPS levels was strongly associated with all-cause mortality and amputation after EVT in patients with PAD. Furthermore, NPS was found to be an independent predictor of these clinical outcomes.

The Importance of Nitric Oxide and Oxidative Stress in Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Patients with Cardiac Devices.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial High Rate Episodes (AHRE) are subclinical atrial tachyarrhythmias detectable by cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). AHREs have been associated with an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF), thromboembolism, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and mortality. Although recent studies have assessed the value of oxidative stress markers in patients with AF, the relationships between AHRE and oxidative stress markers, including nitric oxide, has not yet been elucidated. This study aims to investigate the relationship between these markers and AHRE. METHOD: This prospective, cross-sectional study comprised 180 patients with CIEDs. The study population was divided into two groups based on the presence (n = 78) and absense (n = 102) of AHRE to analyze its association with biomarkers. RESULTS: The AHRE (+) group was significantly older, had a higher prevalence of hypertension, higher NT-proBNP (508.8 ± 249 pg/mL vs. 415.3 ± 292.1; P = 0.037), MDA levels (20.9 ± 4.1 µmol/L vs. 19.1 ± 3.1 µmol/L; P = 0.006), and iNOS activity (1,935.9 ± 326.1 pg/mL vs. 1,677.4 ± 363.2 pg/mL; P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified age, hypertension, MDA (odds ratio [OR]: 1.131, 95%CI: 1.009 - 1.268, P = 0.035), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity (OR = 1.002, 95% CI = 1.001 - 1.003, P < 0.001), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity (OR = 0.990, 95% CI = 0.986 - 0.984, P < 0.001) as independent predictors of AHRE. CONCLUSION: The study findings indicated that plasma levels of NT-proBNP, MDA, nitric oxide, and the expression of iNOS and eNOS were significantly associated with AHRE. Moreover, elevated plasma MDA concentrations, increased iNOS activity, and decreased eNOS activity were identified as independent predictors of AHRE.

The Relationship between the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Ischemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography. / A Relação entre o Índice de Imuno-Inflamação Sistêmica e Isquemia com Artérias Coronárias Não Obstrutivas em Pacientes Submetidos à Angiografia Coronária.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia with the non-obstructive coronary artery (INOCA) is an ischemic heart disease that mostly includes coronary microvascular dysfunction and/or epicardial coronary vasospasm due to underlying coronary vascular dysfunction and can be seen more commonly in female patients. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) is a new marker that predicts adverse clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the relationship between INOCA and SII, a new marker associated with inflammation. METHODS: A total of 424 patients (212 patients with INOCA and 212 normal controls) were included in the study. Peripheral venous blood samples were received from the entire study population prior to coronary angiography to measure SII and other hematological parameters. In our study, the value of p<0.05' was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value of SII for predicting INOCA was 153.8 with a sensitivity of 44.8% and a specificity of 78.77% (Area under the curve [AUC]: 0.651 [95% CI: 0.603-0.696, p=0.0265]). Their ROC curves were compared to assess whether SII had an additional predictive value over components. The AUC value of SII was found to be significantly higher than that of lymphocyte (AUC: 0.607 [95% CI: 0.559-0.654, p = 0.0273]), neutrophil (AUC: 0.559 [95%CI: 0.511-0.607, p=0.028]) and platelet (AUC: 0.590 [95% CI: 0.541-0.637, p = 0.0276]) in INOCA patients. CONCLUSIONS: A high SII level was found to be independently associated with the existence of INOCA. The SII value can be used as an indicator to add to the traditional expensive methods commonly used in INOCA prediction.

FUNDAMENTO: A isquemia com artéria coronária não obstrutiva (INOCA) é uma doença cardíaca isquêmica que inclui principalmente disfunção microvascular coronariana e/ou vasoespasmo coronariano epicárdico devido à disfunção vascular coronariana subjacente e pode ser observada mais comumente em pacientes do sexo feminino. O índice de inflamação imunológica sistêmica (SII, relação plaquetas × neutrófilos/linfócitos) é um novo marcador que prediz resultados clínicos adversos na doença arterial coronariana (DAC). OBJETIVO: Este estudo tem como objetivo investigar a relação entre INOCA e SII, um novo marcador associado à inflamação. MÉTODOS: Um total de 424 pacientes (212 pacientes com INOCA e 212 controles normais) foram incluídos no estudo. Amostras de sangue venoso periférico foram recebidas de toda a população do estudo antes da angiografia coronária para medir o SII e outros parâmetros hematológicos. Em nosso estudo o valor de p<0,05' foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. RESULTADOS: O valor de corte ideal do SII para prever o INOCA foi 153,8, com sensibilidade de 44,8% e especificidade de 78,77% (Área sob a curva [AUC]: 0,651 [IC 95%: 0,603­0,696, p=0,0265]). Suas curvas ROC foram comparadas para avaliar se o SII tinha um efeito preditivo adicional valor sobre os componentes. O valor da AUC do SII foi significativamente maior do que o do linfócito (AUC: 0,607 [IC 95%: 0,559­0,654, p = 0,0273]), neutrófilos (AUC: 0,559 [IC 95%: 0,511­0,607, p = 0,028]) e plaquetas (AUC: 0,590 [IC 95%: 0,541­0,637, p = 0,0276]) em pacientes INOCA. CONCLUSÕES: Verificou-se que um nível elevado de SII estava independentemente associado à existência de INOCA. O valor do SII pode ser usado como um indicador para adicionar aos métodos tradicionais e caros comumente usados na previsão do INOCA.

The prognostic value of the MAGGIC risk score in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVES: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the sudden blockage of the pulmonary arteries. Although the MAGGIC risk score has emerged as a valuable tool in predicting outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure, it has also been demonstrated and identified as a prognostic model in various cardiac diseases other than heart failure. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between MAGGIC score and adverse outcomes in patients with PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 302 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute PE were retrospectively included in the present study. For each patient, the MAGGIC score was calculated. The study population was divided into two groups according to the median value of MAGGIC score. RESULTS: Patients with high MAGGIC score had a significantly higher proportion of elderly and female individuals, lower BMI, higher presence of CAD, DM, AFib, HF, HT, CKD, COPD, and ACEI/ARB and NOAC usage. Logistic regression analyses was carried out using univariate and multivariate analysis to predict the in-hospital and 30-day mortality predictors in the included PE patients. For in-hospital mortality, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, RV dilatation, and the MAGGIC score (HR: 1.166, 95 % CI 1.077-1.263, p < 0.001) and for short-term mortality, sPESI and the MAGGIC score (HR: 1.925, 95 % CI 1.243-2.983, p:0.003) were found to be independent predictors for adverse outcomes in patients with acute PE. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that the MAGGIC score can be applied as a valuable prognostic tool for acute pulmonary embolism.

Evaluation of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Outpatients in the Post-COVID-19 Period With Electrocardiographic Ventricular Depolarization and Repolarization Parameters

Abstract Background A recently identified viral illness called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading quickly. Numerous cardiovascular issues such as arrhythmias and electrocardiogram (ECG) alterations have been linked to COVID-19. Objective In this investigation, we compared ECG indicators of depolarization and repolarization heterogeneity between symptomatic individuals who complained of palpitations and chest discomfort following COVID-19 and those who did not. Methods In this prospective case-control study, 56 post-COVID-19 patients who did not have any symptoms of chest discomfort or palpitations were included in the control group and compared with a study group comprising 73 post-COVID-19 patients who presented at the outpatient clinic with complaints of chest pain and palpitation. Electrocardiographic (ECG) measures were used to assess depolarization and repolarization of the ventricles. These measures included the Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) interval, QT dispersion (QTd), Tp-e/QT ratio, Tp-e/QTc ratio, frontal QRS-T (fQRS-T) angle, and fragmented QRS (FQRS). Two cardiologists recorded the patients' ECG data. A statistically significant result was defined as a p value less than 0.05. Results The results of multivariate analysis including FQRS, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT, and Tp-e/cQT showed that presence of FQRS (OR: 6.707, 95% CI: 1.733-25.952; p = 0.006) was an independent predictor of symptomatic post-COVID -19 patients. Conclusion In our study, FQRS was found to be significantly higher in symptomatic post-COVID-19 patients than in non-symptomatic post-COVID-19 patients, while Tp-e interval was found to be lower.