Glucose intolerance is common in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome who were not previously diagnosed with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Postprandial hyperglycemia has emerged as a new glycometabolic condition associated with an excessive risk for coronary artery disease. We therefore attempted to evaluate the frequency of postchallenge hyperglycemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who were not previously diagnosed to have diabetes and did not have a fasting glucose concentration of > or =7 mmol/l or an HbA(1c) level >6.0%. We further correlated the presence of postchallenge hyperglycemia with the extent of coronary atherosclerosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In all, 134 consecutive ACS patients who met the above inclusion criteria were studied. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed before discharge. RESULTS: The mean age, fasting glucose, and HbA(1c) were 60 years, 5.15 mmol/l, and 5.4%, respectively. Among ACS patients, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and diabetes were found in 50 (37%) and 13 patients (10%), respectively. The homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance did not differ substantially among the normal glucose tolerance (NGT), IGT, and diabetic groups. Insulinogenic index, however, was lower and the number of stenosed vessels higher in diabetic patients compared with NGT patients. CONCLUSIONS: Postchallenge hyperglycemia, caused primarily by impaired initial insulin secretion, is commonly found in Japanese ACS patients who have not been previously diagnosed with diabetes, and this phenomenon is considered to be associated with advanced coronary atherosclerosis. Therefore, the present study strongly supports the notion that oral glucose tolerance test assessment of postchallenge hyperglycemia is essential to identify any previously undiagnosed diabetes cases among Japanese ACS patients.

Pericarditis causing congestive heart failure as an initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Pericarditis is a common complication in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, however, that causing congestive heart failure (CHF) is a rare initial manifestation of SLE. We treated a patient whose initial manifestation of SLE was pericardial effusion causing CHF, which improved following prednisolone therapy that led to a dramatic decrease in pericardial effusion and improvement in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as shown in Doppler echocardiography findings. Further, the plasma brain natriuretic peptide level became normalized.

Combined treatment with valsartan and spironolactone prevents cardiovascular remodeling in renovascular hypertensive rats.

Treatment with an angiotensin blocker (ARB) and an aldosterone blocker has been shown to have beneficial effects on cardiac remodeling in several cardiac diseases. It is still not clear whether the combination of these drugs is more effective against cardiac remodeling than the use of either agent alone. We examined the effects of combined treatment with valsartan, an ARB, and spironolactone, an aldosterone blocker, on cardiac remodeling in the renovascular hypertensive (RHT) rat. The RHT rats were divided into 4 groups administered valsartan (3 mg/kg/day, ARB group), spironolactone (4 mg/kg/day, SPRL group), both drugs at these doses (combined group), or neither drug (untreated RHT group). After 5 weeks, systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced in the 3 treatment groups, however, there were no significant differences in the extent of blood pressure reduction among the 3 treatment groups. The heart weight/body weight ratio in each of the 3 treatment groups was significantly lower than that in the untreated RHT group. The degree of cardiac and perivascular fibrosis in the SPRL group and the combined group were significantly lower than that in the untreated RHT group. Myocyte remodeling in the ARB group and in the combined group was significantly smaller than that in the untreated RHT group. These results suggest that SPRL treatment prevents cardiac and perivascular fibrosis and ARB treatment suppresses the cellular hypertrophy of myocytes, and that, therefore, combined treatment with both drugs prevents cardiac remodeling by acting against both myocyte hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis in RHT rats.

Chronobiological analysis by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring of the hyperbaric and hypobaric indexes for evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of long-acting nifedipine.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that chronobiology can provide new insights into the evaluation and treatment of cardiovascular disease. In the present study the hyperbaric index (hyperBI) and hypobaric index (hypoBI) were compared with the mean blood pressure (BP) over 24 h to evaluate the antihypertensive effect of long-acting nifedipine on essential hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated with nifedipine CR (20-40 mg/day) for 6 months. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed before and after treatment. The hyperBI (mmHg . h/day) was calculated as the integrated BP area above the conventional upper limit (140/90 mmHg for the daytime and 120/80 mmHg at night), and the hypoBI was calculated as the integrated BP area below the conventional lower limit (110/60 mmHg for the daytime and 100/50 mmHg at night). At baseline, both the systolic and diastolic 24-h hyperBI values closely correlated with the 24-h mean BP (r=0.994 and 0.935, p<0.0001). Treatment with nifedipine significantly lowered both the 24-h mean systolic and diastolic BP (143+/-14/89 +/-12 to 124+/-16/80+/-8 mmHg, p<0.001/p=0.001), as well as the casual BP (167+/-11/101 +/-8 to 140+/-13/86+/-10 mmHg, p<0.001/p<0.01). Reduction of both the systolic and diastolic hyperBI values was statistically significant over the 24-h period (274+/-266 to 90+/-155, p=0.009; 145+/-187 to 41+/-63, p=0.024), as well as during the daytime (200+/-181 to 66+/-116, p=0.014; 105+/-120 to 24+/-38, p=0.017) and at night (systolic, 74+/-106 to 24+/-52, p=0.021). The 24-h mean BP was normalized, but a small excess BP load persisted despite treatment. There was no significant increase of systolic hypoBI during the 24-h period (1+/-2 to 25+/-30, p=0.065), the daytime (0+/-0 to 14+/-38, p=0.20), or at night (1+/-3 to 11+/-19, p=0,052). Similar findings were obtained for diastolic hypoBI. CONCLUSIONS: Nifedipine CR improved the 24-h hyperBI and mean BP without causing excessive hypotension. These 2 parameters have a close relationship when assessment is done by 24-h BP monitoring. The hyperBI and hypoBI may assist in providing adequate antihypertensive therapy for individual patients by detecting an excessive BP load or hypotension, respectively.