Primary paraesophageal hernia repair with Gore® Bio-A® tissue reinforcement: long-term outcomes and association of BMI and recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair remains the gold-standard treatment for paraesophageal hernia (PEH). We analyzed long-term symptomatic outcomes and surgical reintervention rates after primary PEH repair with onlay synthetic bioabsorbable mesh (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ) and examined body mass index (BMI) as a possible risk factor for poor outcomes and for recurrence. METHODS: We queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic primary PEH repair with onlay patch of a bioprosthetic absorbable mesh (Bio-A® Gore®) between 05/28/2009 and 12/31/2013. Electronic health records were accessed to record demographic and operative data and were reviewed up to the present to identify any repeat procedures. Patients were grouped according to preoperative BMI (A: BMI < 25; B: BMI = 25-29.9; C: BMI = 30-34.9; D: BMI ≥ 35). Patients completed standardized satisfaction and symptom surveys. RESULTS: In total, 399 patients were included. Most patients (n = 261; 65.4%) were women. Mean age was 59.6 ± 13.4 years; mean BMI was 29.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2. The patients were grouped as follows: A, 53 patients (13.3%); B, 166 (41.6%); C, 115 (28.8%); D: 65 (16.3%). Four procedures (1.0%) were converted from laparoscopy to open procedures. All patients underwent an antireflux procedure (225 Nissen, 170 Toupet, 4 Dor). A mean follow-up of 44.7 ± 22.8 months was available for 305 patients (76.4%). 24/305 patients (7.9%) underwent reoperation, and the number of reoperations did not differ among groups (P = 0.64). Long-term symptomatic outcomes were available for 217/305 patients (71.1%) at a mean follow-up of 54.0 ± 13.1  months; no significant difference was observed among groups. 194/217 patients (89.4%) reported good to excellent satisfaction, with no significant differences among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic primary PEH repair with onlay Bio-A® mesh is a safe and feasible procedure with excellent long-term patient-centered outcomes and acceptable symptomatic recurrence rate. BMI does not appear to be related to the need for surgical reintervention.

Prevalence and Natural History of Barrett's Esophagus in Lung Transplant: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE)-intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus-may progress to low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and ultimately, invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The course of BE in immunosuppressed lung transplant recipients is unknown. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent lung transplant at a single center, Norton Thoracic Institute in Phoenix, Arizona, between January 1, 2010 and October 31, 2016. Pretransplant esophagram, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring, high-resolution manometry, and gastric emptying studies were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 466 patients who underwent lung transplant during the study period, 54 (11.59%) had BE on pretransplant esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Of these, 1 patient had HGD before lung transplant. The median age of patients was 64 years (interquartile range, 58.25 to 68.75 years); 66.7% were men. Median follow-up duration was 29.48 months (interquartile range, 19.69 to 37.98 months). Sixteen of 54 patients (29.62%) underwent antireflux surgery after lung transplant. LGD or EAC developed in 3 patients during posttransplant surveillance. One patient had a diagnosis of HGD 24 months after retransplant. She underwent complete endoscopic ablation and was dysplasia-free for 5 months, but ultimately the condition recurred, and she underwent esophagectomy for invasive cancer. Two patients had a diagnosis of LGD 7 and 13 months after lung transplant and were successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation. The rate of progression to dysplasia or EAC was 2.3% per patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: BE seems to be more prevalent in lung transplant recipients than in the general population. The study findings suggest that patients with BE have a higher risk of BE-to-EAC progression after lung transplant and that HGD may progress rapidly in immunosuppressed patients. More intensive surveillance endoscopy may be required in patients with BE after lung transplant.

Transabdominal robot-assisted diaphragmatic plication: a 3.5-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: Diaphragmatic paralysis, a known cause of dyspnoea, can drastically reduce breathing efficiency, diminishing quality of life. We report our 3.5-year experience with 22 consecutive patients who underwent transabdominal, robot-assisted diaphragmatic plication for diaphragmatic paralysis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 22 consecutive patients who underwent this procedure by a single surgeon from 5 September 2012 to 12 May 2016. The primary outcome measure was change in dyspnoea severity, which was measured with the 5-point Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (a score of 5 indicates breathlessness so severe, the individual is homebound). RESULTS: Of the 22 patients who underwent robotic diaphragmatic plication, 17 (77.3%) patients were male. Median body mass index was 30 kg/m2 (range 24.2-42.17 kg/m2). Most plications (13 of 22, 59.1%) were left sided; one (4.6%) was bilateral. Median operating time was 161 min (range 107-293 min), but this time was higher for the first 3 procedures (255 min, range 239-293 min). Median length of stay was 2 days, and median time to chest tube removal was 1 day. At follow-up, 20 of the 22 (91%) patients reported improved breathing and 2 reported no change. No patient reported worsened dyspnoea. The median Medical Research Council score changed from 4.0 preoperatively to 2.0 postoperatively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transabdominal robotic diaphragmatic plication involves small incisions but improves surgical dexterity. Surgical times are reasonable, and this surgical technique can be adopted with a quick but steep learning curve. Early results show good functional outcomes.