Making a racket in America's fastest growing sport: Evaluation of noise exposure in pickleball.

OBJECTIVE: To measure noise exposure present on pickleball courts and assess the risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) per guidelines put forward by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). METHODS: Observational study measuring noise levels at multiple recreational pickleball courts in the Richmond, VA area, documenting LAeq, LASmax, and LCpeak at courtside and waiting areas of pickleball courts. Measurements were completed using the NIOSH SLM application on an iPhone 13 with iMM-6 Calibrated Measurement Microphone (equivalent to IEC 61672-1 Class II) that was calibrated using ND-9 Sound Level Calibrator (IEC942 Class I). RESULTS: Average sound levels recorded at waiting areas adjacent to the courts, measured in LAeq, LASmax, and LCpeak, were 69.1 dBA, 92.0 dBA, and 112.1 dBC, respectively, while courtside measurements were 69.7 dBA, 92.2 dBA, and 115.6 dBC, respectively. These measurements were within NIOSH and OSHA recommendations. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrates that randomly sampled pickleball courts have noise levels that do not increase risk for NIHL for participants or bystanders alike based on NIOSH guidelines. However, prolonged noise exposure and ambient noise pollution may have other health implications and warrant further investigations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

Endoscopic-Assisted Presigmoid Approach to the Internal Auditory Canal. A Feasibility Study.

HYPOTHESIS: The retrolabyrinthine (presigmoid) approach has been utilized in various skull base surgeries but has not been fully utilized in the management of internal auditory canal (IAC) lesions, such as vestibular schwannoma (VS). Microsurgical retrolabyrinthine approach provides limited visualization of the IAC, while endoscopic-assisted techniques allow for further lateral exposure with labyrinthine preservation. BACKGROUND: Traditional approaches to the IAC have the disadvantage of hearing sacrifice or retraction of brain tissue. With the introduction of endoscopic techniques and enhanced visualization, access to this region of complex anatomy is possible. METHODS: Radiomorphometric and anatomical dissection was performed on two cadaveric temporal bones. High-resolution computed tomography was used to segment and delineate the volume of the IAC. Projected accessible IAC was compared to actual postdissection data with preservation of the posterior semicircular canal (PSCC) via the retrolabyrinthine corridor. RESULTS: While preserving the PSCC, the 0° and 30° endoscopes visualized 57.1% and 78.6% of the IAC for cadaver 1, and 64.0% and 76.0% of the IAC for cadaver 2, respectively. Sacrificing the PSCC, the 0° and 30° endoscopes provided visualization of 78.6% 85.7% of the IAC for cadaver 1, and 88.0% and 95.1% of the IAC for cadaver 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Retrolabyrinthine approach to resection of VS is a potentially viable hearing-preserving alternative to traditional approaches. This approach provides access to the majority of the IAC, while angled endoscopes or sacrifice of the PSCC can provide additional access toward the fundus. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical feasibility of this approach.