A cross-sectional study of the association of dental health factors with progression and all-cause mortality in men diagnosed with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Human Papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) incidence is increasing among men in the United States. Poor dental health has previously been associated with risk of head and neck cancers, oral HPV infection, and persistence but it is not understood whether dental health is associated with outcomes. We sought to determine the association of dental health with progression free survival and overall mortality among men with an HPV-OPC. METHODS: A cross sectional study of men diagnosed with HPV-OPC between 2014-2020 at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, FL was conducted. Dental records were abstracted for assessment of dental fitness prior to cancer treatment. Five dental factors including number of teeth lost, pocket depth, gingival score, loss of attachment, and bone loss were individually examined. Risk factor and outcome data were collected from a patient risk questionnaire and medical record. Using item response theory, an overall dental fitness score from five dental factors was developed in which missing data were multiply imputed. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess whether dental factors were associated with progression-free survival or overall mortality. RESULTS: Among 206 HPV-OPC cases, median follow-up was 3.4 years (IQR: 2.4-4.4) during which 40 cases involved progression or mortality and 25 deaths occurred. Overall dentition was significantly associated with progression free survival (p = 0.04) and with overall survival (p = 0.03) though findings were not significant after adjustment for age at diagnosis, stage, and smoking history (p = 0.146 and p = 0.120, respectively). A pocket depth of 7 mm or more was associated with overall survival (HR: 5.21; 95% CI: 1.43-19.11) and this remained significant after adjustment for confounding (aHR: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.72-16.26). CONCLUSIONS: Among men diagnosed with an HPV-associated OPC in the US, worse dental health was associated with reduced progression free survival and overall survival, but not after adjustment for confounders. Further studies are needed to examine whether dental health is associated with other prognostic factors and subsequent treatment-related outcomes.

Methylation of HPV 16 and EPB41L3 in oral gargles: Associations with oropharyngeal cancer detection and tumor characteristics.

Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) incidence is increasing significantly among men and often requires intensive therapy causing significant morbidity. Early detection of OPC is needed, when monotherapy can be safely delivered with less treatment-associated morbidity, while maintaining high cure rates. We conducted a study of 101 pretreatment male OPC cases matched 1:1 to 101 disease-free controls for age and smoking history. Oral gargles were collected from cases and controls with additional biopsies or aspirates from cases. The HPV SPF10 -LiPA25 PCR assay was utilized for HPV genotyping. Methylation of three CpG sites (438, 427 and 425) in the EPB41L3 gene and methylation status of the L1 (6,367, 6,389), L2 (4,257, 4,262, 4,266, 4,269, 4,275, 4,282) and E2 (3,412, 3,415, 3,417, 3,433, 3,436) CpG sites of HPV 16 positive specimens was assessed by pyrosequencing. Significant correlations were observed between tumor and oral specimens for all methylation biomarkers (p < 0.01). EPB41L3 and HPV 16 L1, L2 and E2 methylation were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher among cases than controls, regardless of early vs. late disease. When HPV 16 genes and EPB41L3 methylation status were combined in a logistic regression analysis, a sensitivity of 70.3% and a specificity of 90.9% were observed for the detection of OPC from an oral gargle. Our data suggest that methylation biomarkers measured in oral gargles may have utility in identifying OPC early. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings and to inform additional biomarkers that can maximize specificity and sensitivity for early OPC detection.

Methylation of HPV16 and EPB41L3 in oral gargles and the detection of early and late oropharyngeal cancer.

As oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) increases in men, the need for a screening test to diagnose OPC early is crucial. While HPV-associated OPC has a favorable prognosis, recurrence is likely, and metastatic OPC is often incurable regardless of HPV status. Our previous study of pretreatment, male OPC cases (n = 101) and age- and smoking-matched controls (n = 101) found methylation of the host EPB41L3 tumor suppressor gene and HPV16 in the oral gargle was correlated with these biomarkers in the tumor. Methylation of these genes in the oral gargle was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher among cases compared to controls. To further study the utility of HPV16/EPB41L3 methylation, we expanded the sample size and specifically increased the number of early OPC cases (T1-T2, N0-N1; small tumors with a single ipsilateral node <3 cm) to evaluate these biomarkers in early and late OPC. This study included 228 OPC cases, 92 of which were early cases and frequency matched to 142 healthy controls. In logistic regression, the AUC for HPV16/EPB41L3 methylation for all OPC cases was 0.82. Among early and late OPC cases, the AUC was 0.78 and 0.85, respectively. For early cases, 76% sensitivity was achieved, replicating results from our prior study, with a specificity of 65%, indicating room for improvement. The ability of HPV16/EPB41L3 methylation to distinguish OPC from healthy controls highlights its utility as a potential biomarker for OPC. However, the inability to predict early OPC better than late stage OPC indicates the need for additional biomarkers to improve screening performance.

Using the Electronic Health Record to Characterize the Hepatitis C Virus Care Cascade.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the main causes of hepatocellular carcinoma. Before initiating a multilevel HCV screening intervention, we sought to (1) describe concordance between the electronic health record (EHR) data warehouse and manual medical record review in recording aspects of HCV testing and treatment and (2) estimate the percentage of patients with chronic HCV infection who initiated and completed HCV treatment using manual medical record review. METHODS: We examined the medical records for 177 patients (100 randomly selected patients born during 1945-1965 without evidence of HCV testing and 77 adult patients of any birth cohort who had completed HCV testing) with a primary care or relevant specialist visit at an academic health care system in Tampa, Florida, from 2015 through 2018. We used the Cohen κ coefficient to examine the degree of concordance between the searchable data warehouse and the medical record review abstractions. Descriptive statistics characterized referral to and receipt of treatment among patients with chronic HCV infection from medical record review. RESULTS: We found generally good concordance between the data warehouse abstraction and medical record review for HCV testing data (κ ranged from 0.66 to 0.87). However, the data warehouse failed to capture data on HCV treatment variables. According to medical record review, 28 patients had chronic HCV infection; 16 patients were prescribed treatment, 14 initiated treatment, and 9 achieved and had a reported posttreatment undetected HCV viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Using data warehouse data provides generally reliable HCV testing information. However, without the use of natural language processing and purposeful EHR design, manual medical record reviews will likely be required to characterize treatment initiation and completion.

Oral HPV prevalence assessment by Linear Array vs. SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 system in the HPV Infection in Men (HIM) study.

INTRODUCTION: Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) attributable oropharyngeal cancers are on the rise in many countries. Oral HPV infections among healthy individuals are commonly detected using oral gargle samples. However, the optimal method for HPV genotyping oral gargle specimens in research studies has not been previously evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oral gargle samples from 1455 HPV Infection in Men (HIM) study participants were HPV genotyped using two different methods: Linear Array and the SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25. The sensitivity of the two tests for detecting individual HPV types and grouped HPV types, high-risk HPV, low-risk HPV, grouped 4-HPV-vaccine types, and grouped 9-HPV-vaccine-types, and the degree of concordance between the two tests was assessed. We also examined whether socio-demographic-behavioral factors were associated with concordance between the two assays. RESULTS: The sensitivity of SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 was higher than Linear Array, with the exception of HPV 70, for the detection of oral HPV. The prevalence ratio of SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 to Linear Array varied between 1.0 and 9.0 for individual HPV genotypes, excluding HPV 70, and between 3.8 and 4.4 for grouped 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccine types, respectively. There was no association between socio-demographic-behavioral factors and discordance in results between the two tests for oral HPV 16 detection. DISCUSSION: SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 was more sensitive than Linear Array for detecting HPV in oral gargle samples. Given the growing importance of detecting oral HPV infection for research studies of oral HPV natural history and vaccine effectiveness evaluation, we recommend using methods with higher sensitivity such as SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 for detecting HPV in oral gargle samples.

Oral gargle-tumor biopsy human papillomavirus (HPV) agreement and associated factors among oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) cases.

OBJECTIVE: Assess oral gargle-tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) agreement among oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) cases by several disease characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 171 treatment naïve OPSCC were enrolled 2014-2017. Tumors were categorized as early or late disease with early disease defined as T1-2 with no nodal involvement or at most a single ipsilateral positive node <3 cm. Oral gargle samples were obtained via a 30-second rinse and gargle. The RHA Kit HPV SP10-LiPA25 was utilized for HPV genotyping of tumor (FFPE) and oral gargle specimens. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, percent agreement, and 95% exact binomial confidence intervals were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to predict agreement. RESULTS: 83.0% and 93.0% of oral gargle and tumor specimens were HPV positive. Oral gargle-tumor agreement for any oncogenic HPV type and HPV 16 was 73.7%. High oncogenic HPV oral gargle-tumor agreement was observed for late disease presentation, p16 positive cases, and tumors at the tonsils (74.5-80.8%). Similar trends were observed for HPV 16. Agreement for any oncogenic HPV and HPV 16 was significantly higher for late vs. early disease (77.9% vs 57.1%, p = 0.01). Oral gargle-tumor oncogenic HPV and HPV 16 agreement was independently associated with age ≥50 years and late disease presentation. CONCLUSION: Overall, oral-tumor HPV agreement among OPSCC was relatively high. However, oral-tumor HPV agreement was significantly lower among younger cases and those diagnosed with earlier disease. Additional biomarkers are needed to improve oral HPV test characteristics to identify OPSCC early.

Human Papillomavirus Genotype Detection in Oral Gargle Samples Among Men With Newly Diagnosed Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Importance: The most common cause of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and currently the standard of care to determine the HPV infection status in this type of carcinoma is to use p16 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate marker of high-risk HPV infection. Although p16 immunohistochemistry is limited by the inability to determine the specific HPV genotypes, oral gargle samples may be a readily available source of HPV DNA for genotyping. Objective: To determine the specific HPV genotypes present in both oral gargle samples and tumor specimens. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, biomarker cohort study conducted at a single specialized cancer hospital in Florida screened approximately 800 potentially eligible participants from May 2014 through October 2017. To be eligible for participation, patients had to meet all of the following criteria: 18 years of age or older, male sex, newly diagnosed as having stage I to IV cancer of the oropharynx, a squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis, treatment naive or at least 4 weeks after chemoradiation or surgical treatment of other diseases, fully understand the study procedures and risks involved, and voluntarily agree to participate by signing an informed consent statement. Main Outcomes and Measures: Detection rate of HPV infection and HPV genotypes in oral gargle samples and tumor specimens. Results: A cohort of 204 male participants with newly diagnosed oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma was assessed in this prospective collection of comprehensive clinical data and oral gargle samples. Most study participants (190 [93.1%]) were white and ever smokers (114, 55.9%), with a median age of 61 years (range, 35-87 years). The HPV infection status could be assessed in 203 of 204 participants (99.5%) using oral gargle samples: 35 samples (17.2%) were negative for HPV infection, whereas 168 samples (82.8%) were positive for HPV infection. The detection rate of HPV genotypes was 93.0% in tumor specimens (160 specimens) and 82.8% (168 samples) in oral gargle samples. The oral gargle samples frequently had low-risk HPV genotypes that were not detected in tumors, but these low-risk genotypes were always a coinfection with high-risk genotypes. Conclusions and Relevance: Oral gargle samples can be used to detect the majority of clinically relevant HPV genotypes found in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, but the interpretation of HPV detected in these samples should be assessed with caution for general cancer risk assessment given that sensitive assays can concomitantly detect low-risk genotypes.