Safety and effectiveness of a selective strategy for coronary artery revascularization before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety and effectiveness of a selective percutaneous revascularization strategy before TAVI in a single-center prospective registry. BACKGROUND: Management of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is not yet established. METHODS: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) was scheduled in proximal-to-mid coronary segment lesions on major coronary branches. TAVI was performed by percutaneous trans-femoral, trans-subclavian or trans-apical approach, using either the self-expandable III generation CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA) or the Edwards SAPIEN(™) /SAPIEN XT balloon-expandable prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences Irvine, CA). Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was collected at 30-day, 3,6,12-month and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Out of 191 patients who underwent TAVI, 113 (59.2%) had CAD. Mean age was 80.5 ± 6.9 years (57.6% female), logistic EuroSCORE was 21.4% ± 13.4. Twenty-seven (14.1%) patients had previous percutaneous and 29 (15.2%) surgical revascularization. PCI was performed as scheduled before TAVI in 39 (20.4%) patients, without adverse events. Complete anatomical revascularization was obtained in 38 of 113 CAD patients (33.6%). After TAVI, 30-day mortality was 4.2%, and was comparable between CAD and no-CAD patients (P = ns), while 30-day myocardial infarction incidence was 2.6% and occurred only in the CAD group (4.4%, P = 0.06). Overall mortality at follow-up (12.9 ± 9.5 months) was 14.8%, without difference between groups (P = 0.88). At follow-up, five patients underwent coronary revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the incidence of CAD is high in patients referred for TAVI. A selective, clinical based, coronary revascularization before TAVI seemed to be safe, and was associated with an outcome similar to those observed in no-CAD TAVI patients.

Comparison between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of older patients affected by coronary artery disease: results from a single-center allcomers registry.

The treatment of elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is challenging because this population is complex and greatly expanding. Drug-eluting stents (DES) generally improve the outcome in high-risk cases. We evaluated the clinical impact of different first-generation DES, i.e., sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), in this context. A prospective, nonrandomized, single-center, allcomers registry consecutively enrolling all patients aged ≥75 years eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES was carried out. Only one type of DES was implanted per protocol for each patient. Two groups were identified according to the type of implanted stent, i.e., SES and PES. The primary end point encompassed major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary end point encompassed the rate of definite/probable stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR). From June 2004 to May 2008, 151 patients were enrolled. Among them, 112 (74.2%) received SES and 39 (25.8%) received PES. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar, while few angiographic features (ostial location, stent diameter, proximal reference vessel diameter) showed minor differences. At the median follow-up of 22.6 months, primary and secondary end points did not significantly differ in terms of MACE (SES 12.5% vs PES 20.5%, P = 0.3), death (SES 5.4% vs PES 7.7%, P = 0.7), myocardial infarction (SES 4.5% vs PES 10.3%, P = 0.2), TLR (SES 2.7% vs PES 2.6%, P = 1.0), stent thrombosis (SES 1.8% vs PES 5.1%, P = 0.3), and TVR (SES 1.8% vs PES 0%, P = 0.6). In this real-world population of elderly patients treated by DES-PCI for CAD, the overall efficacy and safety have been excellent in both DES, and the choice between SES and PES did not influence the clinical outcome.

Performance of valve-in-valve for severe para-prosthetic leaks due to inadequate transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports on mid-term safety and performance of valve-in-valve implantation as rescue strategy to overcome acute PPL after TAVI. BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe para-prosthetic leaks (PPL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have been described with both self-expandable and balloon-expandable device. METHODS: We analyzed data regarding patients who underwent valve-in-valve implantation, enrolled in the ongoing single-center prospective registry of TAVI, the Padova University REVALVing experience Registry. All procedures were performed by a totally percutaneous approach, using the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). RESULTS: Out of 87 patients who underwent TAVI, six received valve-in-valve implantation because of persisting severe PPL, due to prosthesis malposition. In all patients, the second device was successfully deployed, with a significant reduction in aortic regurgitation: PPL was no longer appreciable in two of six patients, and it decreased from severe to mild or trivial in four patients. Four patients developed atrio-ventricular block requiring pace-maker implantation. At follow-up (6-24 months) two patients died, whereas no prosthesis-related death occurred. Transprosthesis pressure gradient, effective orifice area, and aortic regurgitation did not change at serial echocardiograms throughout the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Valve-in-valve implantation using self-expandable bioprosthesis seems safe and highly effective to overcome severe PPL due to prosthesis malposition early after TAVI. Moreover, the implantation of two valves does not affect the performance of prosthesis at follow-up.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in very high risk patients: safety of drug-eluting stents.

Percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis using drug-eluting stents (DES) has been suggested as the best approach for patients who are poor surgical candidates. Some concerns have recently been raised regarding the risk of stent thrombosis following DES implantation. This study was performed in order to evaluate the safety of DES, as compared to bare metal stents (BMS), for ULMCA stenosis treatment in very high risk patients with a high likelihood of stent thrombosis. Forty-two consecutive patients were treated with either BMS (20) or DES (22) for ULMCA critical stenosis. Inclusion criteria were: ST elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation ≥ 13%. At 1 year, one case of late thrombosis and three cases of restenosis were reported in the BMS group and none in the DES group, leading to a significantly inferior rate of target lesion revascularization (20.0 vs. 0%, p = 0.048) and major adverse cardiac events (65.0 vs. 19%, p = 0.004). DES placement for ULMCA stenosis also appears to be a safe therapeutic choice in very high-risk patients, as it provides the benefit of a reduction in restenosis without increasing the risk of early or late stent thrombosis.

Design and methodologies of the POSTconditioning during coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (POST-AMI) trial.

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion remains the definitive treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but restoring blood flow carries the potential to exacerbate the ischemia-related injury. Postconditioning might modify reperfusion-induced adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: The POSTconditioning during Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (POST-AMI) trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized study, with a planned inclusion of 78 patients with ST-elevation AMI. Patients will be randomly assigned to the postconditioning arm [primary angioplasty (PA) and stenting followed by brief episodes of ischemia-reperfusion early after recanalization] or non-postconditioning arm. All patients will be treated medically according to current international guidelines, including glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors before PA. The primary end point is to evaluate whether postconditioning, compared to plain PA, reduces infarct size estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 30 +/- 10 days after the AMI. Secondary end points are microvascular obstruction observed at CMR, ST-segment resolution, angiographic myocardial blush grade <2, non-sustained/sustained ventricular tachycardia in the 48 h following PA, left ventricular remodeling and function at follow-up CMR, and the reduction of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and 6 months. CONCLUSION: The POST-AMI trial will evaluate the usefulness of postconditioning in limiting infarct size during the early and late phases after AMI.

Transapical Deployment of Thoracic Stent Graft for Ascending Aorta Coronary Bypass Pseudoaneurysm in a Patient with Prosthetic Aortic Valve.

The authors describe the transapical deployment of a thoracic endograft to exclude a saphenous vein graft proximal anastomotic pseudoaneurysm following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in a 63-year-old male with a prosthetic aortic valve. A standard thoracic endograft has been deployed via transapical access after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the native vessel perfused by the patent CABG. The procedure was uneventful; an 8-month computed tomography scan showed complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm with patency of supra-aortic trunks.

Depressive symptoms, functional measures and long-term outcomes of high-risk ST-elevated myocardial infarction patients treated by primary angioplasty.

The presence of major depressive symptoms is usually considered a negative long-term prognostic factor after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI); however, most of the supporting research was conducted before the era of immediate reperfusion by percutaneous coronary intervention. The aims of this study are to evaluate if depression still retains long-term prognostic significance in our era of immediate coronary reperfusion, and to study possible correlations with clinical parameters of physical performance. In 184 patients with recent ST-elevated AMI (STEMI), treated by immediate reperfusion, moderate or severe depressive symptoms (evaluated by Beck Depression Inventory version I) were present in 10 % of cases. Physical performance was evaluated by two 6-min walk tests and by a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test: somatic/affective (but not cognitive/affective) symptoms of depression and perceived quality of life (evaluated by the EuroQoL questionnaire) are worse in patients with lower levels of physical performance. Follow-up was performed after a median of 29 months by means of telephone interviews; 32 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred. The presence of three vessels disease and low left ventricle ejection fraction are correlated with a greater incidence of MACE; only somatic/affective (but not cognitive/affective) symptoms of depression correlate with long-term outcomes. In patients with recent STEMI treated by immediate reperfusion, somatic/affective but not cognitive/affective symptoms of depression show prognostic value on long-term MACE. Depression symptoms are not predictors "per se" of adverse prognosis, but seem to express an underlying worse cardiac efficiency, clinically reflected by poorer physical performance.

Moderate-to-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation and multivessel coronary artery disease: Impact of different treatment on survival and rehospitalization.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of moderate-to-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation with multivessel coronary artery disease is still debated. We analysed the effect of different treatments, i.e. medical therapy (MT), coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) alone and CABG with mitral valve surgery (MVS), on the survival and rehospitalization of these patients. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2002, we identified 111 consecutive patients, aged 73+/-8 years, with chronic moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation and multivessel coronary artery disease at cardiac catheterization, in absence of primary valve disease. Twenty-two patients were treated by MT, 50 by CABG and 39 by CABG+MVS. Overall, the median clinical and echocardiographic follow-ups were 34.9 and 14.6 months, respectively. RESULTS: Groups differed significantly (p < 0.03) for left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (MT 153+/-54, CABG 125+/-35, CABG + MVS 129+/-38, ml/m2), ejection fraction (MT 35+/-14, CABG 38+/-13, CABG + MVS 50+/-14, %) and mammary artery graft use (CABG 60, CABG + MVS 74, %). While in-hospital mortality was higher in surgical patients (MT 13.6, CABG 18, CABG + MVS 17.9, %, p=0.09), 7-years mortality showed a trend in favour of CABG + MVS compared to other groups (MT 100, CABG 57, CABG + MVS 29, %, p = 0.1). After adjusting for baseline differences, CABG alone or with MVS had a 57% (HR 0.43, p = 0.005) and 53% (HR 0.47, p = 0.02) risk reduction of combined cardiac death and rehospitalization rate compared to MT. However, only CABG + MVS independently predicted mortality (risk reduction 65%, HR 0.35, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In moderate-to-severe ischemic mitral regurgitation and multivessel coronary artery disease, surgery reduced total cardiac events but only a concomitant MVS significantly improved survival.

Functional parameters but not heart rate variability correlate with long-term outcomes in St-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Depressed heart rate variability (HRV) is usually considered a negative long-term prognostic factor after acute myocardial infarction. Anyway, most of the supporting research was conducted before the era of immediate reperfusion by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Main aim of this study was to evaluate if HRV still retains prognostic significance in our era of immediate PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two weeks after STEMI treated by primary PCI, time-domain HRV was assessed from 24-h Holter recordings in 186 patients: markedly depressed HRV (SDNN <70ms or <50ms) was present in 16% and in 5% of cases, respectively; patients with left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% presented more often SDNN values in the lowest quartile. Physical performance was also assessed, by 6-minute walk tests (6MWT) and by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). After >2years from infarction, occurrence of major clinical events (MCE) was investigated. Cases with or without MCE did not differ by initial HRV parameters; Kaplan-Meier events-free survival curves were similar between patients with lowest quartile SDNN and the remaining ones (χ2 0.981, p=0.322). By the contrary, events-free survival was worse if patients walked shorter distances at 6MWT (χ2 6.435, p=0.011), developed poorer ventilatory efficiency at CPET (χ2 10.060, p=0.002), or presented LVEF <40% (χ2 7.085, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In primary-PCI STEMI patients, markedly abnormal HRV was found in a small percentage of cases. HRV seems to have lost its prognostic significance, while parameters indicating LV function (LVEF and physical performance) could allow better prognostication in primary-PCI STEMI patients.

Intermediate Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Concerns still exist regarding long-term results and freedom from valve-related adverse events in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to assess intermediate-term (up to 5-year) clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: From 2007 through 2013, 338 consecutive patients underwent TAVI at our institution. Preoperative variables were defined according to the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) definitions, and outcomes were reported according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality at follow-up. RESULTS: transfemoral (TF) and transapical (TA) TAVI were performed in 233 (69%) and 105 (31%) patients, respectively. All-cause 30-day mortality was 4.4%, with no differences between TA and TF procedures. Thirty-day cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction were not different between groups. The acute kidney injury (AKI) rate was higher in the TA group (30.5% versus 11.2%; p < 0.001). Access-related complications were more frequent in the TF group (36.1% versus 11.4%; p < 0.001). Mean follow-up was 22.3 ± 17.8 months (range, 1-74 months). Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 85.5% ± 2.1%, 69.9% ± 3.2%, and 61% ± 4.3%, respectively. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality at follow-up were previous myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR], 2.7), any grade of paravalvular leak (PVL) (OR, 2.5), and AKI (OR, 3.1). Mean gradient and effective orifice area at follow-up were 10.7 ± 12.0 mm Hg and 1.1 ± 0.9 cm(2)/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that TAVI has good early and intermediate-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in high-risk or inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. PVL of any grade has a significant impact on survival.

Unravelling the (arte)fact of increased pacemaker rate with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve.

AIMS: Early data on the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve (S3-THV) have shown low rates of paravalvular leaks and vascular complications but relatively high 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) rates. No direct comparisons on clinical outcomes including PPMI rates are available for the S3-THV and the Edwards SAPIEN XT (XT-THV). We aimed to compare the 30-day PPMI rates in patients treated with the two prostheses and to assess the interplay among valve type, depth of implantation and PPMI rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and nine patients treated by TAVI were considered. The S3-THV was associated with higher PPMI rates compared to the XT-THV, both overall and in subgroups matched for several predictors of PPMI. However, in the S3-THV group, 30-day PPMI was strictly associated with deep valve implantation, and PPMI risk of high-implanted S3-THVs was similar to that of the overall XT-THV matched group. No cases of significant paravalvular leak were observed in the S3-THV group. CONCLUSIONS: The S3-THV was associated with a higher incidence of PPMI compared to the XT-THV. In the S3-THV group, pacemaker implantation was strictly associated with deep valve implantation. An implantation technique involving higher initial placement of the central marker (from 0 to 3 mm above the base of the aortic cusps) and, as a consequence, higher final valve depth might help in preventing post-TAVI PPMI with the S3-THV, without affecting the risk of paravalvular leak.

Impact of type of intervention for aortic valve replacement on heart rate variability.

BACKGROUND: It is known that coronary heart surgery leads to varying degrees of cardiac autonomic derangement, clinically detectable as depression of heart rate variability (HRV) parameters. Few studies report that also surgical replacement of the aortic valve (SAVR) may lead to HRV abnormalities, while very little is known about the autonomic effects obtained after less invasive aortic valve replacement techniques. The study aimed to evaluate HRV after SAVR and to compare it with two less invasive techniques, transapical (TaAVI) and tranfemoral (TfAVI) aortic valve implant. METHODS: Time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) parameters have been studied by 24-h Holter ECG in 129 patients after SAVR, in 63 patients after TfAVI and in 19 patients after TaAVI. RESULTS: All HRV parameters were significantly depressed in SAVR, while they were almost completely preserved in TfAVI patients; TaAVI cases showed a somehow intermediate behaviour [(SDNN respectively: 71.0±34.9 vs 95.9±29.5 (p<0.001) vs 84.4±32.6ms (p=ns)]. Mean heart rate during the 24-h Holter was 8% higher in SAVR patients than in both TfAVI and TaAVI patients. The reported results were not correlated with echocardiographic ejection fraction, or presence of abnormal glucose metabolism, or degree of anaemia or treatment with beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: SAVR leads to profound depression of some cardiac autonomic parameters, while less invasive procedures allow better preservation of HRV. In particular TfAVI does not induce any significant deterioration of HRV parameters and seems to be the strategy of valve implant with less impact on the cardiovascular autonomic system.

Gender differences in left ventricular function in patients with isolated aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Hypertrophic response of the left ventricle to systolic overload in aortic stenosis appears to be gender-dependent. METHODS: To examine gender-related differences in left ventricular (LV) function in patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis, 145 patients (65 women, 80 men; mean age 66 +/- 8 years; range: 50 to 89 years) with aortic valve area <0.8 cm2 who underwent cardiac catheterization were studied. No patient had associated myocardial, coronary or other valve disease; patients with diabetes mellitus and systemic hypertension were excluded. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in aortic valve area between men and women. Neither were there any significant gender-related differences in LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV mass indexed by body surface area, LV mass:volume ratio, LV mass:height ratio, elastic stiffness constant, ejection fraction, pulmonary wedge pressure, pulmonary arteriolar resistance and preload. Women showed significantly higher mean transaortic gradient, LV peak systolic pressure and peak systolic stress, end-systolic stress:end-systolic volume ratio, heart rate and cardiac index. In the subgroup of patients with LV pressure >199 mmHg, the mass:volume ratio was increased in men compared with women; of note, the mass:volume ratio in women was not increased in this subgroup compared with the general population. LV pump function in this subgroup was normal and did not differ between men and women. CONCLUSION: Although no clear-cut difference in hemodynamic parameters was seen, there was a trend towards a less compensatory increase in LV mass in females.

Aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction: determinants of cardiac mortality and ventricular function recovery.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction on survival of patients with severe aortic stenosis is poorly characterized. Few data are available about preoperative predictors of cardiac mortality and LV function recovery after aortic valve replacement of such patients. The aim of our study was to examine the outcome and the preoperative predictors of postoperative cardiac death and of LV function recovery in these patients. METHODS: We evaluated 85 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm(2)) and severe depression of LV ejection fraction (EF) <35% at cardiac catheterization. Among them, 52 underwent aortic valve replacement and they were compared to patients who were not operated on. All patients had a mean clinical follow-up of 53 months and 94% of them had a mean echocardiographic follow-up of 14 months after aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: The mean baseline characteristics included: LVEF 28+/-6%, peak-to-peak transvalvular gradient 51+/-29 mmHg, aortic valve area 0.63+/-0.25 cm(2). Thirty-three patients did not undergo aortic valve replacement: 32 of them died within 3 years. Fifty-two patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 16 had a concomitant coronary bypass surgery. In-hospital mortality was 8%. Postoperative NYHA functional class changed from 2.84+/-0.67 to 1.43+/-0.44 (P<0.001) and LVEF from 29+/-6% to 43+/-10% (P<0.001). At follow-up 10 patients died of heart disease. By multivariate analysis, preoperative LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) was the only covariate of cardiac death (LVESVI/10 ml/m(2), OR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.8, P<0.028). By using a receiver operating characteristic curve, LVESVI< or =90 ml/m(2) was the best cut-off value (sensitivity and specificity 78%) to fit with a better survival (93% vs. 63%, P<0.01) and with LVEF recovery after aortic valve replacement (EF improved by 15+/-10% vs. 8+/-5%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite LV dysfunction, aortic valve replacement appears to change drastically the natural history of severe aortic stenosis. Preoperative LV levels predict different postoperative survival rate and LVEF recovery.

Six-year clinical outcomes of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a propensity-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-eluting stents are more effective in reducing restenosis than bare-metal stents. Paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) are the most widely used first-generation drug-eluting stents, but long-term comparative data on these are scant. The aim of the present report is to investigate the 6-year clinical outcomes of PES versus SES in a matched cohort of single-center registry patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the observational, monocentric registry of 632 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between September 2002 and September 2005 with PES or SES. We assessed the composite and separate occurrence of the major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: After a propensity 1 : 1 matching analysis, baseline clinical, procedural, and angiographic characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. Throughout the 6 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences between PES and SES in terms of MACE (P=0.52), all-cause death (P=0.24), myocardial infarction (P=0.25), stent thrombosis (P=0.38), and TLR (P=0.68). The sensitivity analysis on the total unmatched population confirmed this result, the stent type not being predictive of MACE (PES vs. SES group, hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.41, P=0.87) or TLR (PES vs. the SES group, hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.69-2.64, P=0.38). CONCLUSION: In this 'real-life' registry, PES and SES showed a comparable safety and efficacy profile throughout the 6 years of follow-up. The increase in the rate of TLR was slow and comparable between the two groups, even though the 'late catch-up' phenomenon showed a different temporal pattern between PES and SES.

Clinical outcome of patients with de novo coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the Tryton Side Branch Stent. The SAFE-TRY prospective multicenter single arm study.

BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation lesions represent a difficult problem regularly confronting interventional cardiologist, in part due to the lack of dedicated device. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the Tryton Side Branch Stent (Tryton Medical, Durham, NC, USA), a dedicated bare metal stent deployed in conjunction with a standard drug-eluting stent to treat bifurcation lesions. METHODS: The SAFE-TRY is a prospective single arm multicenter registry including patients with de novo bifurcation lesions in native coronary arteries and syntax score <32. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 30 days that comprised cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included device, angiographic and procedural success, 9-month major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), and stent thrombosis (ST) rates (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01174433). RESULTS: Among 252 enrolled patients, 24% had diabetes and 35.3% unstable angina. True bifurcation lesions involving both branches occurred in 96.8% of cases with Medina classification 1.1.1 in 62%. The left anterior descending artery and the left main were treated in 70% and 8.3% of the patients, respectively. A 6 Fr guide catheter was used in 61% of the cases. Device, angiographic and procedural success rates were 99.6%, 99.6% and 97.2% respectively. The 30-day TVF was 2.8%; the 9-month MACCE rate was 13.7%, with target lesion revascularization being 4.4%. No definite ST occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, multicenter study confirmed the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the Tryton Side Branch Stent to treat patients with de novo complex bifurcation lesions.

Gender-related differences of diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: a real-life multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Gender-based differences in diabetic patients are understudied in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. METHODS: Data were obtained from a multicenter registry of 2420 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent PCI with paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stents between 2003 and 2009. Among them, 679 (28.1%) women were compared to 1741 (71.9%) men in terms of clinical aspects and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Target vessel revascularization (TVR) and any revascularization were also reported. RESULTS: Women were less numerous, older, used more insulin and showed more tortuous coronary arteries, while men were more frequently smokers and received larger stents. At the median follow-up of 24.3 months (interquartile range 12.3-39.7), MACE, TVR and any revascularization did not significantly differ between females and males (19.9% vs 18.7%, 12.2% vs 13.4%, 14.1% vs 15.1%, respectively). At multivariable analysis of the overall cohort, female gender was not a predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-2.36, p=0.11), death (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84-1.24, p=0.86), MI (HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.92-2.36, p=0.11), and TLR (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.85-1.52, p=0.38). CONCLUSION: In this registry of diabetic patients treated by drug-eluting stents, women were less represented, older and needed more insulin compared to men who, on the other hand, received larger stents. Gender-related outcomes were similar and female sex did not predict MACE.

Impact of preoperative mitral valve regurgitation on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this single-centre prospective study was to assess the impact of preoperative mitral valve regurgitation (MR) on outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: From June 2007 to January 2011, 176 consecutive patients underwent TAVI at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups according to the degree of MR: <2+, the NoMR group (133 patients); ≥2+, the MR group (43 patients). Clinical and echocardiographic examination were performed before the procedure, at discharge, 1, 3, 6, 12 months after TAVI and yearly thereafter. The mean follow-up was 10.4 ± 7.7 months (range 1-36). RESULTS: MR patients had higher EuroSCORE (27 ± 16 vs. 20 ± 11%, P < 0.001), lower ejection fraction (49 ± 13 vs. 57 ± 12%, P = 0.001), higher systolic pulmonary pressure (50 ± 17 vs. 39 ± 10 mmHg, P < 0.001) and larger left ventricular volumes (end-diastolic volume index: 78 ± 29 vs. 66 ± 20 ml/m(2), P = 0.002) than NoMR. Hospital mortality was 9.3% (four patients) and 3% (four patients) in MR and NoMR groups, respectively (P = 0.10). The Kaplan-Meier survival at 20 months was 78 ± 8 and 75 ± 6% in MR and NoMR groups, respectively (P: n.s.). At follow-up, the degree of MR in the MR group decreased to trivial-mild in 28% of patients. Patients of both groups experienced a significant reduction in the New York Hear Association class, being in class I-II in 91% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing TAVI with preoperative MR ≥ 2+ have a higher surgical risk profile and a trend towards higher hospital mortality. MR was not identified as a risk factor for mortality. At follow-up, a reduction in MR and an improvement of echocardiographic parameters were observed in the MR group.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: immediate and mid-term results, a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist about transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with low ejection fraction. The aim of the study was to analyze safety, feasibility, and efficacy of TAVI in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study sample (384 patients) was divided into 2 groups: group A (50 patients) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and group B (334 patients) with LVEF >35%. Clinical, anatomic, and hemodynamic variables, as well as procedural results and follow-up outcomes, were compared between the groups. Procedural success was reached in 88%, with no significant difference between the groups. The incidence of periprosthetic leak >2+/4 after TAVI was higher in group A. All other complications were similar between the 2 groups. Group A showed a significant and early improvement in LVEF (from 27.7±6.0-35.2±11.1 after TAVI; P<0.0001). Thirty-day mortality was 4%; however, this was higher in group A compared with group B (10% versus 3%; P=0.010). Predictors of the cumulative late mortality were congestive heart failure, logistic euroSCORE, and moderate-to-severe periprosthetic leakage after TAVI. Estimated survival by Kaplan Meier at 1 year was, respectively, 69% in group A and 87% in group B (log rank <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a safe and effective procedure, even in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, leading to a high procedural success rate with an acceptable rate of complications and 30-day mortality. Also in these critically ill patients, TAVI provides clinical amelioration, with early improvement in LVEF.