RESUMO
In dysphagia assessment, along with well-defined measurements and signs, voice parameters can potentially support clinical decision as a marker, but more evidence is needed. This study aims to determine the voice parameters that can predict the risk of dysphagia and to determine optimal cutoff values in individuals with multiple sclerosis (IwMS). Seventy-six adults participated in the study, including 39 IwMS and 37 healthy individuals (HI). The study used the Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (DYMUS), Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS), and Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) and recorded voice samples using Praat programme. Voice recordings were taken pre- and post-swallowing. The voice parameters analysed are fundamental frequency (F0), standard deviation F0 (SD F0), jitter (local), shimmer (local), and harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR). Roc analysis was performed to examine the diagnostic accuracy performance of the risk for dysphagia/penetration. The parameters of IwMS pre-swallowing differed significantly from those of HI on the VHI-10, DYMUS, GUSS scores, and jitter (local), shimmer (local), and HNR. IwMS but not HI exhibited significant differences in shimmer (local) and HNR between the pre- and post-swallowing measurements. In IwMS, GUSS revealed significant differences in shimmer (local) pre- and post-swallowing between the groups with and without dysphagia/penetration. In the ROC analysis results, the area under the curve (AUC) for shimmer (local) pre-swallowing was 73.1% (cutoff = 1.69); post-swallowing, it was 78.6% (cutoff = 1.57). In conclusion, IwMS can be associated with differences in shimmer (local) and HNR parameters, low quality of life-related to voice, and dysphagia/penetration risk. The AUC values for shimmer (local) in IwMS pre- and post-swallowing may help to strengthen diagnostic decisions of dysphagia risk.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Special education teachers (SETs) work with students with disabilities. To get and keep these students' attention during the lesson, they may use their voices with high loudness and frequent pitch changes. These situations can be tiring for their voices and affect their vocal health. This study aimed to compare SETs' voice fatigue, reflux symptoms, and self-assessments according to their voice use habits in their work and social lives. METHODS: A total of 208 SETs were included. A Teacher Voice Use Habits Questionnaire was developed by considering the literature, taking expert opinion, and conducting a pilot study. In addition, the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), Voice Handicap Index-30 (VHI-30), and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) were used. One-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis-H, and Pearson correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of SETs, 37.5% reported frequent hoarseness, and 65.4% reported voice fatigue during/at the end of the day. Those who answered "yes" to the questions about talking loudly at home, having the television on at home, feeling stressed in the work environment, eating and drinking before going to bed at night, smoking, having frequent colds, talking loudly during the day, and voice fatigue during/at the end of the day had significantly higher scores in all scales. Those who used their voice for more than 6hours were found to have significantly higher scores on the VFI and RSI. In all scales, the scores of those who made very frequent long phone calls were significantly higher. CONCLUSION: According to the SETs' reports, it was concluded that they did not comply with the rules of vocal hygiene, although they used their voices for a long time. This situation should be considered an occupational health problem in schools, and it may be helpful to screen this group's voice disorders and design preventive programs.