Intratumoral Immunotherapy-Update 2019.

Intratumoral immunotherapies aim to trigger local and systemic immunologic responses via direct injection of immunostimulatory agents with the goal of tumor cell lysis, followed by release of tumor-derived antigens and subsequent activation of tumor-specific effector T cells. In 2019, a multitude of intratumoral immunotherapies with varied mechanisms of action, including nononcolytic viral therapies such as PV-10 and toll-like receptor 9 agonists and oncolytic viral therapies such as CAVATAK, Pexa-Vec, and HF10, have been extensively evaluated in clinical trials and demonstrated promising antitumor activity with tolerable toxicities in melanoma and other solid tumor types. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a genetically modified herpes simplex virus type 1-based oncolytic immunotherapy, is the first oncolytic virus approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of unresectable melanoma recurrent after initial surgery. In patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma, T-VEC demonstrated a superior durable response rate (continuous complete response or partial response lasting ≥6 months) over subcutaneous GM-CSF (16.3% vs. 2.1%; p < .001). Responses were seen in both injected and uninjected lesions including visceral lesions, suggesting a systemic antitumor response. When combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, T-VEC significantly improved response rates compared with single agent; similar results were seen with combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and other intratumoral therapies such as CAVATAK, HF10, and TLR9 agonists. In this review, we highlight recent results from clinical trials of key intratumoral immunotherapies that are being evaluated in the clinic, with a focus on T-VEC in the treatment of advanced melanoma as a model for future solid tumor indications. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review provides oncologists with the latest information on the development of key intratumoral immunotherapies, particularly oncolytic viruses. Currently, T-VEC is the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved oncolytic immunotherapy. This article highlights the efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of T-VEC both as monotherapy and in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review summarizes current knowledge on intratumoral therapies, a novel modality with increased utility in cancer treatment, and T-VEC, the only U.S. FDA-approved oncolytic viral therapy, for medical oncologists. This review evaluates approaches to incorporate T-VEC into daily practice to offer the possibility of response in selected melanoma patients with manageable adverse events as compared with other available immunotherapies.

Observational study of talimogene laherparepvec use in the anti-PD-1 era for melanoma in the US (COSMUS-2).

AIM: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an intralesional therapy for unresectable, metastatic melanoma. T-VEC real-world use in the context of anti-PD1-based therapy requires further characterization. MATERIALS & METHODS: A retrospective review of T-VEC use from 1 January 2017 and 31 March 2018 for melanoma patients was conducted at seven US institutions. RESULTS: Among 83 patients, three categories of T-VEC and anti-PD-1 therapy were identified: T-VEC used without anti-PD-1 (n = 29, 35%), T-VEC after anti-PD-1-based therapy (n = 22, 27%) and concurrent T-VEC and anti-PD-1-based therapy (n = 32, 39%). 25% of patients discontinued T-VEC therapy due to no remaining injectable lesions, 37% discontinued T-VEC due to progressive disease. Discontinuation of T-VEC did not differ by anti-PD-1-based therapy use or timing. CONCLUSION: In real-world settings, T-VEC may be used concurrently with or after anti-PD-1-based therapy.

Kit ligand 2 promotes murine oocyte growth in vitro.

Oocyte-granulosa cell communication, mediated by paracrine factors, is essential for oocyte development. Kit ligand (KITL) is expressed in granulosa cells as soluble (KITL1) or membrane-associated (KITL2) proteins. However, the relative biopotency of each isoform during oocyte development is unknown. Our initial results showed that Kitl2 was down-regulated in cultured granulosa cells. To determine the effect of the two isoforms of KITL on oocyte growth, Kitl-deficient fibroblasts were transfected with constructs expressing either KITL1 or KITL2, and growing oocytes were isolated from 12-day-old mice and cultured on the transfected fibroblasts for 2 days. At the end of culture, oocyte diameters were measured, the incidence of spontaneous germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) was noted, and oocytes were analyzed for KIT receptor expression. Oocyte growth occurred only in the presence of the KITL2-producing fibroblasts, and suppression of KITL2 expression impaired oocyte growth. Up-regulation of KIT expression occurred in the presence of KITL2 but not KITL1. The presence of KITL2 inhibited spontaneous GVBD. Meiosis inhibitors did not attenuate the GVBD that occurred in the absence of KITL2, suggesting that this process reflects oocyte degeneration rather than meiotic progression. These results indicate that KITL2 is the principal KITL isoform required for oocyte growth and survival in vitro.