[INCREMENT]9-Tetrahydrocannabinol discriminative stimulus effects of AM2201 and related aminoalkylindole analogs in rats.

The recent recreational use of synthetic cannabinoid ligands, collectively referred to as 'Spice', has raised concerns about their safety and possible differences in their biological effect(s) from marijuana/Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). AM2201, a highly efficacious, potent cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) agonist, is a recently detected compound in 'Spice' preparations. Furthermore, structural analogs of AM2201 are now being found in 'Spice'. The present studies were conducted to investigate their Δ-THC-like effects using drug (Δ-THC) discrimination in rats. Results show that the tested compounds were potent cannabinergics that generalized to the response to Δ-THC, with AM2201 being most potent, exhibiting a 14-fold potency difference over Δ-THC. The other analogs were between 2.5-fold and 4-fold more potent than THC. Surmountable antagonism of AM2201 with the selective CB1R antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant also established that the discrimination is CB1R dependent. Time-course data reveal that AM2201 likely peaks rapidly with an in-vivo functional half-life of only 60 min. The present data confirm and extend previous observations regarding Δ-THC-like effects of 'Spice' components.

Cannabinergic aminoalkylindoles, including AM678=JWH018 found in 'Spice', examined using drug (Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) discrimination for rats.

We examined four different cannabinergic aminoalkylindole ligands, including one drug (AM678=JWH018) found in herbal 'Spice' concoctions, for their ability to substitute for Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and the ability of the cannabinoid receptor 1-selective antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant to block the substitution, 30 and 90 min after intraperitoneal injection. Rats trained to discriminate the effects of vehicle from those produced by 3 mg/kg of THC were used. The order of potency was: AM5983≥AM678>AM2233>WIN55212-2 at both test intervals. AM5983 and AM678 appeared eight times more potent than THC, followed by AM2233 (about twice as potent as THC), and WIN55212-2 approximately THC at the 30-min test interval. The aminoalkylindoles showed reduced potency (i.e. an increased ED50 value) at the longer injection-to-test interval of 90 min compared with testing at 30 min. The rightward shifts by coadministration of rimonabant were approximately 8-fold to 12-fold for AM5983 and AM678, compared with an approximately 3-fold rightward shift for the WIN55212-2 curve. AM2233 (1.8 mg/kg) substitution was also blocked by 1 mg/kg of rimonabant. In conclusion, AM5983 and AM678=JWH018 are potent cannabimimetics derived from an aminoalkylindole template. WIN55212-2 seemed to interact differently with rimonabant, compared with either AM5983 or AM678, indicating potential differences in the mechanism(s) of action among cannabinergic aminoalkylindoles.

Discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant in rats.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor (CB(1)R) antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant (SR141716A) using a discriminated taste aversion (DTA) procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Groups of rats were trained to discriminate between drug (5.6 or 3 mg/kg) and vehicle in DTA (t' = 20 min). The 30-min drinking opportunity after rimonabant pretreatment was followed by injection of lithium chloride (120 mg/kg) in the experimental (EXP) animals. When offered fluid after vehicle pretreatment, EXP animals subsequently were given intraperitoneal saline (NaCl, 10 ml/kg). Post-drinking treatment for controls (CONT) was NaCl irrespective of the pretreatment condition (rimonabant or vehicle). Tests examined other doses and drugs (t' = 20 min). RESULTS: The rimonabant analog AM251 (1 to 5.6 mg/kg) substituted for rimonabant. AM281 also appeared to substitute, but interpretation is complicated by unconditioned effects (drinking suppressed also in the CONT group). The CB(2)R antagonists SR144528 (18 and 30 mg/kg), AM630 (1 to 10 mg/kg), and the CB(1)R agonist methanandamide (mAEA, 3 and 10 mg/kg) did not substitute. There was a dose-related attenuation of the rimonabant-induced suppression of saccharin drinking when Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC; 0.3 to 5.6 mg/kg), but not mAEA (1 to 10 mg/kg), was given together with rimonabant (3 mg/kg). Unconditioned effects occurred with the mAEA-rimonabant combination, not evident for combinations of rimonabant and Delta9-THC. mAEA (10 mg/kg) plus AM251 (5.6 mg/kg) resulted in strong unconditioned effects. CONCLUSION: Rimonabant induces a discriminative stimulus in DTA that continues to show potential for further examination of cannabinoid receptor antagonism.

Tripping with Synthetic Cannabinoids ("Spice"): Anecdotal and Experimental Observations in Animals and Man.

The phenomenon of consuming synthetic cannabinoids ("Spice") for recreational purposes is a fairly recent trend. However, consumption of cannabis dates back millennia, with numerous accounts written on the experience of its consumption, and thousands of scientific reports published on the effects of its constituents in laboratory animals and humans. Here, we focus on consolidating the scientific literature on the effects of "Spice" compounds in various behavioral assays, including assessing abuse liability, tolerance, dependence, withdrawal, and potential toxicity. In most cases, the behavioral effects of "Spice" compounds are compared with those of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Methodological aspects, such as modes of administration and other logistical issues, are also discussed. As the original "Spice" molecules never were intended for human consumption, scientifically based information about potential toxicity and short- and long-term behavioral effects are very limited. Consequently, preclinical behavioral studies with "Spice" compounds are still in a nascent stage. Research is needed to address the addiction potential and other effects, including propensity for producing tissue/organ toxicity, of these synthetic cannabimimetic "Spice" compounds.

Antagonism of discriminative stimulus effects of delta(9)-THC and (R)-methanandamide in rats.

RATIONALE: In previous drug discrimination studies we observed surmountable antagonism by Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the presence of constant doses of SR-141716 [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloro-phenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide] (0.3 and 1 mg/kg), but there was only marginal evidence for surmountable antagonism with combinations of SR-141716 and (R)-methanandamide, a chiral analog of the endocannabioid anandamide. OBJECTIVE: Here we examine antagonism where the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist [Delta(9)-THC and (R)-methanandamide] dose is held constant (i.e., the training dose) and the antagonist {i.e., SR-141716 and AM-251 [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; 2 ml/kg]} dose varied. We also tested the cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist SR-144528 {N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo(2.2.1)heptan-2-yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide}. METHODS: Different groups of rats were trained to discriminate between vehicle and three different doses of Delta(9)-THC (1.8, 3, and 5.6 mg/kg, presumably reflecting different efficacy demands) as well as 10 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide. Dose-generalization tests involved different doses of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists. Antagonist tests varied the dose of the antagonist (range: 0.1 and 3 mg/kg for SR-141716 and AM-251, and 1 to 10 mg/kg for SR-144528). RESULTS: SR-141716 and AM-251 doses dependently blocked the agonist-induced discriminative stimulus effects. SR-141716 tended to be slightly more potent than AM-251. The effective dose 50 (ED(50)) of SR-141716 was higher in the 5.6 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC-trained group relative to the two other Delta(9)-THC-trained groups. The cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist SR-144528 combined with the training dose of 1.8 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC, as well as when combined with the training dose of 10 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide, did not markedly change drug-appropriate (agonist) responses. CONCLUSION: Data support that the discriminative stimulus effects of (R)-methanandamide and its overlap with the Delta(9)-THC cue are, indeed, CB1 receptor mediated events as revealed in antagonism tests with the selective central CB1 receptor antagonists SR-141716 and AM-251. The activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors appears to be insignificant for these discriminations.

Discriminative stimulus functions of AM-1346, a CB1R selective anandamide analog in rats trained with Delta9-THC or (R)-methanandamide (AM-356).

OBJECTIVE: To characterize in vivo the high-affinity cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R) selective anandamide analog AM-1346 [alkoxyacid amide of N-eicosa-tetraenylamine] using drug discrimination procedures. D-amphetamine and also morphine in the (R)-methanandamide-trained group (see below) were examined to assess pharmacological specificity. METHODS: Three groups of rats were trained to discriminate between vehicle and (1) 1.8 mg/kg Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC); (2) 5.6 mg/kg Delta9-THC; and (3) 10 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide (AM-356; a metabolically stable analog of anandamide). Delta9-THC was given i.p. 30 min and (R)-methanandamide 15 min before training. RESULTS: AM-1346 generalized to all three training conditions, both at 15 and 30 min after administration. The rank order potency was: Delta9-THC > AM-1346 > (R)-methanandamide. AM-1346 appeared slightly more potent 30 min compared to 15 min postadministration. In the presence of 0.3 mg/kg of the CB1R antagonist/inverse agonist SR-141716A, the dose generalization curves of Delta9-THC and AM-1346 resulted in parallel shifts to the right in the 1.8 mg/kg Delta9-THC-trained group. A long duration of action for AM-1346 (relative to AM-356) was indicated in tests where AM-1346 was examined in the 5.6 mg/kg Delta9-THC-trained group. Neither D-amphetamine, nor morphine generalized in either of the groups, suggesting pharmacological specificity. CONCLUSION: Unlike (R)-methanandamide, the surmountable antagonism between SR-141716A and AM-1346 shows that the structural features of anandamide can be modified in ways that reduce the dissociation between the discriminative stimulus and rate decreasing effects of CB1R agonists derived from an anandamide template.

A high efficacy cannabinergic ligand (AM4054) used as a discriminative stimulus: Generalization to other adamantyl analogs and Δ(9)-THC in rats.

In addition to endogenous lipids, the two main cloned receptors (CB1R and CB2R) of the endocannabinoid signaling system (ECS) can be activated (and blocked) by various exogenous ligands. A relatively novel template for CB1R activators contains an adamantyl moiety as a key structural subunit, the first being the cannabinergic AM411. Additional chemical optimization efforts using the classical tricyclic scaffold led to AM4054. Here we explored the in vivo consequences of novel adamantyl analogs in rats trained to recognize the effects of the potent adamantyl cannabinergic AM4054. Rats were trained to discriminate between AM4054 (0.1mg/kg) and vehicle. Three AM4054 analogs and Δ(9)-THC were tested for generalization (substitution) and antagonism was assessed with rimonabant. We found that all cannabinergics resulted in response generalization to the target stimulus AM4054. The order of potency was: AM4054≥AM4083≥AM4050>AM4089>Δ(9)-THC. The CB1R antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of AM4054. Thus the examined structural modifications affected binding affinities but did not markedly change potencies with the exception of AM4089. In vitro (cAMP assay) functional data have suggested that AM4089 behaves as a partial rather than as a full agonist at CB1R which could explain its lower potency compared to AM4054 (Thakur et al., 2013). The 9ß-formyl functionality at C-9 position was identified as an important pharmacophore yielding high in vivo potency. Antagonism by rimonabant suggested CB1R mediation.

Novel C-Ring-Hydroxy-Substituted Controlled Deactivation Cannabinergic Analogues.

In pursuit of safer controlled-deactivation cannabinoids with high potency and short duration of action, we report the design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of novel C9- and C11-hydroxy-substituted hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) analogues in which a seven atom long side chain, with or without 1'-substituents, carries a metabolically labile 2',3'-ester group. Importantly, in vivo studies validated our controlled deactivation approach in rodents and non-human primates. The lead molecule identified here, namely, butyl-2-[(6aR,9R,10aR)-1-hydroxy-9-(hydroxymethyl)-6,6-dimethyl-6a,7,8,9,10,10a-hexahydro-6H-benzo[c]chromen-3-yl]-2-methylpropanoate (AM7499), was found to exhibit remarkably high in vitro and in vivo potency with shorter duration of action than the currently existing classical cannabinoid agonists.

Adamantyl cannabinoids: a novel class of cannabinergic ligands.

Structure-activity relationship studies have established that the aliphatic side chain plays a pivotal role in determining the cannabinergic potency of tricyclic classical cannabinoids. We have now synthesized a series of analogues in which a variety of adamantyl substituents were introduced at the C3 position of Delta(8)-THC. Our lead compound, (-)-3-(1-adamantyl)-Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol (1a, AM411), was found to have robust affinity and selectivity for the CB1 receptor as well as high in vivo potency. The X-ray crystal structure of 1a was determined. Exploration of the side chain conformational space using molecular modeling approaches has allowed us to develop cannabinoid side chain pharmacophore models for the CB1 and CB2 receptors. Our results suggest that although a bulky group at the C3 position of classical cannabinoids could be tolerated by both CB1 and CB2 binding sites, the relative orientation of that group with respect to the tricyclic component can lead to receptor subtype selectivity.

Cannabinoid withdrawal in mice: inverse agonist vs neutral antagonist.

RATIONALE: Previous reports shows rimonabant's inverse properties may be a limiting factor for treating cannabinoid dependence. To overcome this limitation, neutral antagonists were developed, to address mechanisms by which an inverse agonist and neutral antagonist elicit withdrawal. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to introduce an animal model to study cannabinoid dependence by incorporating traditional methodologies and profiling novel cannabinoid ligands with distinct pharmacological properties/modes of action by evaluating their pharmacological effects on CB1-receptor (CB1R) related physiological/behavioral endpoints. METHODS: The cannabinergic AM2389 was acutely characterized in the tetrad (locomotor activity, analgesia, inverted screen/catalepsy bar test, and temperature), with some comparisons made to Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Tolerance was measured in mice repeatedly administered AM2389. Antagonist-precipitated withdrawal was characterized in cannabinoid-adapted mice induced by either centrally acting antagonists, rimonabant and AM4113, or an antagonist with limited brain penetration, AM6545. RESULTS: In the tetrad, AM2389 was more potent and longer acting than THC, suggesting a novel approach for inducing dependence. Repeated administration of AM2389 led to tolerance by attenuating hypothermia that was induced by acute AM2389 administration. Antagonist-precipitated withdrawal signs were induced by rimonabant or AM4113, but not by AM6545. Antagonist-precipitated withdrawal was reversed by reinstating AM2389 or THC. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest cannabinoid-precipitated withdrawal may not be ascribed to the inverse properties of rimonabant, but rather to rapid competition with the agonist at the CB1R. This withdrawal syndrome is likely centrally mediated, since only the centrally acting CB1R antagonists elicited withdrawal, i.e., such responses were absent after the purported peripherally selective CB1R antagonist AM6545.

Probing the carboxyester side chain in controlled deactivation (-)-δ(8)-tetrahydrocannabinols.

We recently reported on a controlled deactivation/detoxification approach for obtaining cannabinoids with improved druggability. Our design incorporates a metabolically labile ester group at strategic positions within the THC structure. We have now synthesized a series of (-)-Δ(8)-THC analogues encompassing a carboxyester group within the 3-alkyl chain in an effort to explore this novel cannabinergic chemotype for CB receptor binding affinity, in vitro and in vivo potency and efficacy, as well as controlled deactivation by plasma esterases. We have also probed the chain's polar characteristics with regard to fast onset and short duration of action. Our lead molecule, namely 2-[(6aR,10aR)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-1-hydroxy-6,6,9-trimethyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-3-yl]-2-methyl-propanoic acid 3-cyano-propyl ester (AM7438), showed picomolar affinity for CB receptors and is deactivated by plasma esterases while the respective acid metabolite is inactive. In further in vitro and in vivo experiments, the compound was found to be a remarkably potent and efficacious CB1 receptor agonist with relatively fast onset/offset of action.

Discriminative stimulus effects in rats of SR-141716 (rimonabant), a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the discriminative stimulus effects of (i) the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR-141716 (SR, 5.6 mg/kg) and vehicle, and (ii) the cannabinoid receptor agonist Delta(9)-THC (THC, 1.8 mg/kg) and vehicle using a discriminated taste aversion (DTA) procedure. METHODS: Two groups of rats ( n=6) were trained to discriminate between these drugs and vehicle in DTA ( t'=20 min). The 30-min drinking bout of tap water following drug (SR or THC) treatment was followed by an injection of lithium chloride (LiCl, 120 mg/kg) in the experimental animals. When offered water after vehicle pretreatment, experimental animals subsequently were given IP saline (NaCl, 10 ml/kg). Post-drinking treatment for controls ( n=6) was NaCl, irrespective of the pretreatment condition (SR, THC or vehicle). Additional water was provided during the afternoon (30 min) with no other manipulations. Food was available ad lib at all times. When the discriminations were established other doses and drugs were examined ( t'=20 min). In testing there were no post-drinking treatments. RESULTS: The SR-related analog AM-251 (dose range: 1-5.6 mg/kg) substituted for SR, whereas other drugs such as the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist SR-144528 (3 and 10 mg/kg), THC (1-10 mg/kg), flumazenil (1-10 mg/kg), naloxone (1-10 mg/kg), morphine (10 and 18 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (1 and 3 mg/kg) did not. There was a dose-related attenuation of SR-induced suppression of drinking when THC (1.8-10 mg/kg) was given together with SR (5.6 mg/kg). In the THC trained rats, SR (1-10 mg/kg), morphine (10 and 18 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (1 and 3 mg/kg) did not substitute for THC. SR (1 mg/kg) attenuated the THC (1.8 mg/kg) induced suppression of drinking. Together with 3 mg/kg SR and 1.8 mg/kg THC, drinking was roughly equally suppressed in both the experimental group and the controls. CONCLUSION: SR-141716 induces a discriminative stimulus complex in DTA that shows potential for further examination of cannabinoid receptor antagonism.

(R)-Methanandamide and delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced operant rate decreases in rats are not readily antagonized by SR-141716A.

The current study examined the interaction between the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and (R)-methanandamide in combination with the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR-141716A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloro-phenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide HCl) in rats responding for food on a fixed ratio (FR-10) schedule of food reinforcement. The study provided only limited evidence for antagonism by SR-141716A (at 1 mg/kg but not with 0.3, 3 and 10 mg/kg) of the rate suppressant effects induced by the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (and only at the single dose of 5.6 mg/kg Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol). (R)-Methanandamide in combination with SR-141716A resulted in a greater rate suppression compared to that induced by (R)-methanandamide alone. Thus, SR-141716A augmented the rate-decreasing effects of (R)-methanandamide and only minimally altered the rate-decreasing effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol. Additionally, high doses (10 and 30 mg/kg) of SR-141716 singly consistently suppressed the rate of responding. The current results coupled with our previous data examining combinations of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol or (R)-methanandamide and SR-141716 (see text) underscore pharmacological/behavioral differences (whether quantitative or qualitative) between the cannabinoid CB(1) agonists (R)-methanandamide and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol revealed by their interactions with the cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist SR-141716.

Interactions between the CB1 receptor agonist Delta 9-THC and the CB1 receptor antagonist SR-141716 in rats: open-field revisited.

This study examined the effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and the CB1 antagonist SR-141716 on open-field behaviors in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were examined after administration of Delta(9)-THC alone (dose range: 0.3-5.6 mg/kg), SR-141716 alone (dose range: 1-5.6 mg/kg) and the two drugs in combination; injections were given intraperitoneally 30 min prior to testing. There was a dose-related suppression of ambulation (horizontal activity) and rearing (vertical activity) after Delta(9)-THC administration. Co-administration of SR-141716 counteracted this suppression; however, antagonism was only partial for rearing. Interestingly, 1 mg/kg SR-141716 was as effective as 3 and 5.6 mg/kg SR-141716 in this antagonist action. Increasing doses of Delta(9)-THC produced an increase in circling behavior; latency to leave the starting area in the center of the field was significantly elevated by 5.6 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC. Those effects were completely blocked by SR-141716. Grooming and scratching showed a dose-related increase following administration of SR-141716 (1-5.6 mg/kg), which were only partially blocked by co-administration of Delta(9)-THC (3 and 5.6 mg/kg). When given alone, only the highest dose of SR-141716 (5.6 mg/kg) depressed ambulation; rearing and latency were not significantly changed, and circling was absent. Differences in the number of vocalizations, urination and defecation generally did not differ clearly among the treatment conditions. These results may show that SR-141716 is acting as (i) an inverse agonist and/or (ii) that the endogenous cannabinoid system is tonically active under certain conditions.

The cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR-141716 does not readily antagonize open-field effects induced by the cannabinoid receptor agonist (R)-methanandamide in rats.

This study examined the effects of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist (R)-methanandamide and the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR-141716 on open-field behaviors in rats. Animals were examined after administration of (R)-methanandamide (dose range 10 to 30 mg/kg) plus vehicle, and the two drugs in combination; the dose range of SR-141716 was 0.3 to 5.6 mg/kg. Injections were given intraperitoneally 20 min prior to initial testing. Additional exposures to the open-field arena occurred for the groups treated with 30 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide at 60 and 120 min post administration. There was a dose-related suppression of ambulation (horizontal activity) and rearing (vertical activity) after (R)-methanandamide administration. Coadministration of SR-141716 did not counteract the suppression induced by 10 and 18 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide but rather tended to augment it, especially with regard to ambulation using SR-141716 doses of 1 mg/kg and up. The latency to leave the starting area in the center of the field was significantly elevated by 30 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide. This effect was completely blocked by SR-141716. With increasing doses of SR-141716, there was an increase in grooming and scratching. Generally, the strongest effects occurred 20 min post administration with the exception of grooming, which reached maximum at 60 min post. Differences in the number of circlings, vocalizations, urination, and defecation generally did not differ clearly among treatments. These results coupled with previous open-field data examining combinations of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and SR-141716 [Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73 (2002) 911] underscore pharmacological differences between (R)-methanandamide and Delta(9)-THC revealed by their interactions with SR-141716.

"Herbal incense": designer drug blends as cannabimimetics and their assessment by drug discrimination and other in vivo bioassays.

Recently, synthetic cannabinoids originally designed for testing in the laboratory only have found use recreationally in designer herbal blends, originally called "Spice". The myriad of compounds found are for the most part potent full agonists of the cannabinoid receptor 1, producing effects similar to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and marijuana. Drug discrimination of these compounds offers a specific behavioral test that can help determine whether these new synthetic compounds share a similar "subjective high" with the effects of marijuana/THC. By utilization of drug discrimination and other behavioral techniques, a better understanding of these new "designer" cannabinoids may be reached to assist in treating both the acute and chronic effects of these drugs. The paper provides a brief exposé of modern cannabinoid research as a backdrop to the recreational use of designer herbal blend cannabimimetics.

Differentiation between low- and high-efficacy CB1 receptor agonists using a drug discrimination protocol for rats.

RATIONALE: The "subjective high" from marijuana ingestion is likely due to Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) activating the central cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) of the endocannabinoid signaling system. THC is a weak partial agonist according to in vitro assays, yet THC mimics the behavioral effects induced by more efficacious cannabinergics. This distinction may be important for understanding similarities and differences in the dose-effect spectra produced by marijuana/THC and designer cannabimimetics ("synthetic marijuana"). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated if drug discrimination is able to functionally detect/differentiate between a full, high-efficacy CB1R agonist [(±)AM5983] and the low-efficacy agonist THC in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate between four different doses of AM5983 (0.10 to 0.56 mg/kg), and vehicle and dose generalization curves were determined for both ligands at all four training doses of AM5983. The high-efficacy WIN55,212-2 and the lower-efficacy (R)-(+)-methanandamide were examined at some AM5983 training conditions. Antagonism tests involved rimonabant and WIN55,212-2 and AM5983. The separate (S)- and (R)-isomers of (±)AM5983 were tested at one AM5983 training dose (0.30 mg/kg). The in vitro cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) assay examined AM5983 and the known CB1R agonist CP55,940. RESULTS: Dose generalization ed50 values increased as a function of the training dose of AM5983, but more so for the partial agonists. The order of potency was (R)-isomer > (±)AM5983 > (S)-isomer and AM5983 > WIN55,212-2 ≥ THC > (R)-(+)-methanandamide. Surmountable antagonism of AM5983 and WIN55,212-2 occurred with rimonabant. The cAMP assay confirmed the cannabinergic nature of AM5983 and CP55,940. CONCLUSIONS: Drug discrimination using different training doses of a high-efficacy, full CB1R agonist differentiated between low- and high-efficacy CB1R agonists.

Controlled-deactivation cannabinergic ligands.

We report an approach for obtaining novel cannabinoid analogues with controllable deactivation and improved druggability. Our design involves the incorporation of a metabolically labile ester group at the 2'-position on a series of (-)-Δ(8)-THC analogues. We have sought to introduce benzylic substituents α to the ester group which affect the half-lives of deactivation through enzymatic activity while enhancing the affinities and efficacies of individual ligands for the CB1 and CB2 receptors. The 1'-(S)-methyl, 1'-gem-dimethyl, and 1'-cyclobutyl analogues exhibit remarkably high affinities for both CB receptors. The novel ligands are susceptible to enzymatic hydrolysis by plasma esterases in a controllable manner, while their metabolites are inactive at the CB receptors. In further in vitro and in vivo experiments key analogues were shown to be potent CB1 receptor agonists and to exhibit CB1-mediated hypothermic and analgesic effects.

AM2389, a high-affinity, in vivo potent CB1-receptor-selective cannabinergic ligand as evidenced by drug discrimination in rats and hypothermia testing in mice.

RATIONALE: The endocannabinoid signaling system (ECS) has been targeted for developing novel therapeutics since ECS dysfunction has been implicated in various pathologies. Current focus is on chemical modifications of the hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) nabilone (Cesamet(®)). OBJECTIVE: To characterize the novel, high-affinity cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)R) HHC-ligand AM2389 [9ß-hydroxy-3-(1-hexyl-cyclobut-1-yl)-hexahydrocannabinol in two rodent pre-clinical assays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CB(1)R mediation of AM2389-induced hypothermia in mice was evaluated with AM251, a CB(1)R-selective antagonist/inverse agonist. Additionally, two groups of rats discriminated the full cannabinergic aminoalkylindole AM5983 (0.18 and 0.56 mg/kg) from vehicle 20 min post-injection in a two-choice operant conditioning task motivated by 0.1% saccharin/water. Generalization/substitution tests were conducted with AM2389, AM5983, and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC). RESULTS: Δ(9)-THC (30 mg/kg)-induced hypothermia exhibited a faster onset and shorter duration of action compared with AM2389 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg). AM251 (3 and 10 mg/kg) attenuated/blocked hypothermia induced by 0.3 mg/kg AM2389. In drug discrimination, the order of potency was AM2389 > AM5983 > Δ(9)-THC with ED(50) values of 0.0025, 0.0571, and 0.2635 mg/kg, respectively, in the low-dose condition. The corresponding ED(50) values in the high-dose condition were 0.0069, 0.1246, and 0.8438 mg/kg, respectively. Onset of the effects of AM2389 was slow with a protracted time-course; the functional, perceptual in vivo half-life was approximately 17 h. CONCLUSIONS: This potent cannabinergic HHC exhibited a slow onset of action with a protracted time-course. The AM2389 chemotype appears well suited for further drug development, and AM2389 currently is used to probe behavioral consequences of sustained ECS activation.

Central mediation and differential blockade by cannabinergics of the discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant in rats.

RATIONALE: Discovery of an endocannabinoid signaling system launched the development of the blocker rimonabant, a cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB(1)R) antagonist/inverse agonist. Due to untoward effects, this medication was withdrawn and efforts have been directed towards discovering chemicals with more benign profiles. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to comparatively evaluate new ligands using a rimonabant discriminated drinking aversion procedure. METHODS: Rats discriminated between rimonabant (5.6 mg/kg) and vehicle. The 30 min saccharin (0.1%) drinking after rimonabant pretreatment was followed by injection of lithium chloride (120 mg/kg) in the experimental animals. After vehicle pretreatment, experimental animals were given i.p. NaCl (10 ml/kg). Postdrinking treatment for controls was NaCl, irrespective of pretreatment condition (rimonabant or vehicle). RESULTS: The centrally acting neutral CB(1)R antagonist AM4113, but not the limited brain penetrating CB(1)R neutral antagonist AM6545, substituted for rimonabant. The CB(1)R agonists THC (1-10 mg/kg), AM1346 (1-10 mg/kg) did not substitute. The rimonabant-induced conditioned suppression of saccharin drinking was attenuated when CB(1)R agonists AM5983 (0.01-1 mg/kg) and THC (10 mg/kg), but not the CB(1)R agonist AM1346 (0.1-18 mg/kg), were combined with rimonabant (5.6 mg/kg). By varying the injection-to-test interval, we gauged the relative duration of the cueing effects of rimonabant, and the in vivo functional half-life was estimated to be approximately 1.5 h. CONCLUSION: A neutral CB(1)R antagonist (AM4113) produced cueing effects similar to those of rimonabant and generalization likely was centrally mediated. The functional cueing effects of rimonabant are relatively short-acting, pharmacologically selective, and differentially blocked by cannabinergics.