A multicenter retrospective cohort study comparing urethral diverticulectomy with and without pubovaginal sling.

BACKGROUND: Urethral diverticulum is a rare entity and requires a high suspicion for diagnosis based on symptoms and physical exam with confirmation by imaging. A common presenting symptom is stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The recommended treatment is surgical excision with urethral diverticulectomy. Postoperatively, approximately 37% of patients may have persistent and 16% may have de novo SUI. An autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (PVS) placed at the time of urethral diverticulectomy (UD) has the potential to prevent and treat postoperative SUI. However, little has been published about the safety and efficacy of a concomitant pubovaginal sling. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical presentation, outcomes, complications, and diverticulum recurrence rates in women who underwent a urethral diverticulectomy with vs without a concurrent pubovaginal sling. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women who underwent a urethral diverticulectomy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016. Study participants were identified by Current Procedure Terminology codes, and their records were reviewed for demographics, medical or surgical history, symptoms, preoperative testing, concomitant surgeries, and postoperative outcomes. Symptoms, recurrence rates, and complications were compared between women with and without a concomitant pubovaginal sling. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative stress urinary incontinence symptoms. Based on a stress urinary incontinence rate of 50% with no pubovaginal sling and 10% with a pubovaginal sling, we needed a sample size of 141 participants who underwent diverticulectomy without a pubovaginal sling and 8 participants with a pubovaginal sling to achieve 83% power with P<.05. RESULTS: We identified 485 diverticulectomy cases from 11 institutions who met the inclusion criteria; of these, 96 (19.7%) cases had a concomitant pubovaginal sling. Women with a pubovaginal sling were older than those without a pubovaginal sling (53 years vs 46 years; P<.001), and a greater number of women with pubovaginal sling had undergone diverticulectomy previously (31% vs 8%; P<.001). Postoperative follow-up period (14.6±26.9 months) was similar between the groups. The pubovaginal sling group had greater preoperative stress urinary incontinence (71% vs 33%; P<.0001), dysuria (47% vs 30%; P=.002), and recurrent urinary tract infection (49% vs 33%; P=.004). The addition of a pubovaginal sling at the time of diverticulectomy significantly improved the odds of stress urinary incontinence resolution after adjusting for prior diverticulectomy, prior incontinence surgery, age, race, and parity (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-5.03; P=.043). It was not significantly protective against de novo stress urinary incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-2.92; P=.807). Concomitant pubovaginal sling increased the odds of postoperative short-term (<6 weeks) urinary retention (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-6.22; P=.039) and long-term urinary retention (>6 weeks) (adjusted odds ratio, 6.98; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-22.11; P=.001), as well as recurrent urinary tract infections (adjusted odds ratio, 3.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-7.76; P=.013). There was no significant risk to develop a de novo overactive bladder (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-3.91; P=.423) or urgency urinary incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-3.06; P=.30). A concomitant pubovaginal sling was not protective against a recurrent diverticulum (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-2.82; P=.374). Overall, the diverticulum recurrence rate was 10.1% and did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: This large retrospective cohort study demonstrated a greater resolution of stress urinary incontinence with the addition of a pubovaginal sling at the time of a urethral diverticulectomy. There was a considerable risk of postoperative urinary retention and recurrent urinary tract infections in the pubovaginal sling group.

Risk factors for ureteral occlusion during transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To determine any risk factors associated with ureteral occlusion during transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS). METHODS: A retrospective query to identify patients that underwent transvaginal USLS at a teaching hospital from 2008 to 2013 was performed. Patients in which ureteral occlusion was identified by cystoscopy were identified (cases), and compared with those without occlusion (controls). Medical records were reviewed for data abstraction. Variables compared between cases and controls included demographics, medical history/examination, concomitant procedures, number of suspension sutures placed, estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay. Univariate analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for ureteral occlusion, followed by multivariate regression analysis to estimate odds ratios for identified predictors. RESULTS: A total of 144 USLS procedures were performed. Thirteen cases of ureteral occlusion were identified (9%). Baseline prolapse stage, body mass index, parity, previous hysterectomy or pelvic surgery of the groups were similar (all P > 0.05). Univariate analysis identified age (P = 0.04), concomitant anterior colporrhaphy (P = 0.01), and use of a suture-capturing device for suture placement (P = 0.04) as significant factors. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, concomitant anterior colporrhaphy increased ureteral occlusion risk (OR 10.5, 95%CI 2.37-74.99, P = 0.001), while use of a suture-capturing device decreased it (OR 0.1, 95%CI 0-0.41, P = 0.01). The mean number of suspension sutures placed per side was similar in the two groups (2.6 [range 2-4] for cases and 2.4 [range 1-4] for controls, P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: During transvaginal USLS, performance of a concomitant anterior colporrhaphy increased the risk of ureteral occlusion, while the use of a suture-capturing device for suspension suture placement was associated with decreased risk.

Postoperative Pain and Urinary Retention After Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of patients' immediate prevoiding pain level after vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery on their ability to void. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with and without urinary retention after urogynecologic procedures. Postoperative pain, measured by a visual analog scale, was recorded for each patient before a voiding trial. Demographic, surgical characteristics, prevoiding trial pain, and rate of postoperative urinary retention were compared. Multiple-logistic regression analysis was used with all analyses controlled for univariate variables with a P value of ≤0.1 to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Two-tailed tests were used, with P < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 458 patients were identified, of which 21% (97/458) failed their voiding trial. In our study, 62% (284/458) of women had a voiding trial on postoperative day 1, and 38% (174/458) underwent a same-day voiding trial. No differences were noted between groups comparing race, ethnicity, hysterectomy, urinary sling, estimated surgical blood loss, utilization of intraoperative or postoperative narcotics, or the proportion of same-day voiding trials. Women with postoperative urinary retention had higher mean prevoiding pain when compared with women without urinary retention (pain visual analog scale, 25 mm vs 12 mm [P < 0.001], respectively). After multiple-logistic regression analysis, a significant association between postoperative urinary retention persisted for prevoiding trial pain score (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), age (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.02), and anterior colporrhaphy (aOR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.18-3.8). CONCLUSIONS: Prevoiding pain after pelvic surgery is significantly associated with increased rates of postoperative urinary retention.

Qualitative Analysis of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Pessary Use Among Spanish-Speaking Women on the US-Mexico Border.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related to pessary use in Spanish-speaking women along the US-Mexico border. METHODS: Spanish-speaking women with symptoms of vaginal bulge were recruited from the urogynecology/gynecology clinics at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso to participate in moderated focus groups. Discussion topics included knowledge of prolapse/pessaries, pros/cons of pessaries, alternatives, and prolapse surgery. Audio-recorded group discussions were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative analysis completed by independent review using grounded theory methodology. Common themes were identified and then aggregated to form consensus concepts, agreed upon by the reviewers. RESULTS: Twenty-nine Spanish-speaking women participated in 6 focus group discussions. Approximately half of women reported little or no prior knowledge about pessaries. Three main themes were identified from analysis: knowledge/perceptions, misinformation/misconceptions, and surgery-related concerns. Concepts identified from common themes included limited knowledge of pessaries, confusing "pessary" with "mesh," willingness to try pessaries in order to avoid surgery, desire to try pessary if it was recommended by physician, limited efficacy or complications of surgery, and mesh-related concerns. Interestingly, some women reported that pessaries appear to be a treatment more often offered in the United States rather than in Mexico. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants showed a willingness to try a pessary for symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse in an effort to avoid surgery, despite expressing limited knowledge about this treatment. Physician recommendations and risks of pessary use influence their likelihood of trying a pessary. These concepts serve as focus points for effective pessary counseling to help improve education and informed decision making in this patient population.

A 10-Year Case Series of Surgically Managed Periurethral Masses at a Single Tertiary Care Institution.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present the evaluation, diagnoses, and surgical management of symptomatic periurethral masses of women at an academic institution. METHODS: This study is an institutional review board-approved retrospective case series of women who presented with a symptomatic periurethral mass and scheduled for surgery within the Department of Urology and Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery over a 10-year period (October 2003-July 2014). RESULTS: Fifty-nine women (mean age, 46 years; range, 22-73 years) were evaluated during the study period. Final pathology revealed 38 (64%) urethral diverticula and 21 (36%) from other benign etiologies. Of the 38 urethral diverticula, 2 (5%) were associated with adenocarcinoma and 4 (11%) with previous bulking agents. Of the 21 nondiverticula, there were 7 (12%) Skene duct cysts/abscesses, 3 (5%) Gartner duct cysts, 2 (3%) vaginal wall inclusion cysts, 2 (3%) bulking agents, 2 (3%) urethral polyps, and one (2%) of each of the following: leiomyoma, angiomyofibroblastoma, redundant vaginal mucosa epithelium, suture abscess, and encapsulated mesh remnant. Fifty-seven women underwent surgical excision (97%), and 2 elected observation. Most (78%) reported resolution of symptoms after excision. Of the patients surgically managed, 7% had postoperative stress urinary incontinence and 12% had persistent lower urinary tract symptoms. Of the 38 women with urethral diverticula, 17% had recurrence and were more likely to have multiple diverticula (44% vs 8%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Although urethral diverticulum was the most common cause of a periurethral mass, final pathology revealed a variety of benign diagnoses in more than one-third of cases, demonstrating the importance of a thorough investigation for accurate diagnosis.

Furosemide Use and Time to Confirmation of Ureteral Patency During Intraoperative Cystoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intravenous administration of furosemide on the time to confirmation for ureteral patency during intraoperative cystoscopy. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, intravenous administration of furosemide 10 mg was compared with placebo (normal saline) to investigate the effect of furosemide on the time to confirmation for ureteral patency during intraoperative cystoscopy. The primary outcome was time to confirmation of ureteral patency. Secondary outcomes included adverse reaction to study medication and delayed diagnosis of ureteric injury. A sample size of 72 per group (N=144) was powered to detect a 3-minute difference in time to confirmation of ureteral patency between groups. RESULTS: From May 2017 to March 2018, 215 patients were eligible for inclusion and 150 were randomized, with 145 available for final evaluation. The two groups were similar in regard to baseline characteristics. The administration of intravenous furosemide 10 mg in a routine cystoscopy resulted in a shorter time to confirmation compared with the administration of the placebo (86.5 seconds, interquartile range 55.0-137.0 vs 165.0 seconds, interquartile range 77.0-280.0; P<.05). Furthermore, at any given time period, patients receiving intravenous administration of furosemide 10 mg were 2.3 times more likely to have ureteral patency confirmed compared with patients receiving normal saline (95% CI 1.59-3.23). There were no adverse events related to administration of intravenous furosemide and no delayed diagnoses of ureteric injury. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, intravenous administration of 10 mg furosemide at time of intraoperative cystoscopy resulted in a statistically significantly shorter time to confirmation of ureteral patency, though the clinical significance of this finding is small. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02960412.

Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes Toward Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence in Spanish-Speaking Latinas.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to explore individual views and perceptions of Spanish-speaking Latinas living on the US/Mexico border toward pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI), including awareness of conditions, implications of diagnoses, knowledge, and attitudes toward available treatment options. METHODS: Spanish-speaking Latina women were recruited from clinics at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso. Focus group discussions were conducted, addressing topics including female pelvic anatomy, perceived etiology and course of POP and UI, and attitudes toward treatment options. Discussions were transcribed and qualitative analysis performed to identify common themes and concepts. RESULTS: Twenty-four women participated in 5 focus groups as follows: 2 groups of women diagnosed with POP/UI, 2 groups of women with POP/UI symptoms, and 1 group of asymptomatic women. Mean age of participants was 52 years. Participants had a good basic understanding of pelvic organs and function. The following 3 common themes were derived from our analysis: culture, barriers, and misconceptions. Concepts identified from common themes included views of POP/UI as "abnormal" conditions; perceptions that providers may downplay or ignore symptoms of POP/UI; fear of doctor; views of cancer as a common POP complication; embarrassment; views of "massage" therapy as an effective treatment for POP; and willingness to consider all available treatment options for POP and UI, including pessary. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest need for patient reassurance about the prevalence and benign course of POP and UI upon initial assessment, with continued reinforcement of basic concepts after diagnosis, and need for increased awareness and information resources for healthcare providers and Spanish-speaking Latina women regarding these common pelvic floor disorders.