Real-life experience with sorafenib for advanced and refractory desmoid-type fibromatosis.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been a change in the therapeutic landscape of desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF). Watchful waiting is now preferred over initial local treatments such as surgery and radiotherapy. Systemic treatment is considered for progressive or symptomatic disease. The aim of this study is to review real-life data on the use of sorafenib in DF. METHODS: We established a retrospective dataset of patients treated with sorafenib in our centre, Ghent University Hospital, for progressive DF. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, response to therapy using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria and toxicity according to CTCAE v5.0 were assessed. RESULTS: Eleven patients with DF were treated with sorafenib between 2020 and 2024. Median treatment duration was 20.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0-NR). 36.4% achieved partial response, 54.5% stable disease and 9.1% progressive disease. For three patients, the treatment is ongoing. The median time to objective response rate is 15.0 months (95% CI, 8.8-NR). The majority (81.8%) experienced grade 2 toxicity, and one third of patients grade 3 toxicity (36.4%). The most common all-grade adverse event was skin toxicity (hand-foot syndrome, pruritus and rash) (90.9%). Nine patients (81.8%) needed dose reduction with a median time to first reduction of 1.1 months (95% CI, 0.5-NR). One patient stopped treatment due to toxicity. INTERPRETATION: Real-life data on the use of sorafenib in the treatment of DF is consistent with published data in clinical trial setting. Sorafenib is an effective treatment option for progressive DF although associated with significant toxicity and the need for rapid dose reduction.

Combining Surgery, Radiotherapy, and Topical Chemotherapy to Prevent Primary Orbital Exenteration for Atypical Caruncular Melanoma: A Case Report.

Introduction: This case report demonstrates the possibility of successful eye and vision-sparing therapy for caruncular melanoma. Case Presentation: We present an atypical presentation of a caruncular melanoma. After excisional biopsy, residual flat conjunctival melanosis resolved using topical chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil), which was well tolerated. Relapse of the melanoma was treated with external beam radiotherapy, but the tumor grew despite treatment. Eighteen months after complete excision of the relapsed melanoma, the patient remains tumor-free while the eye and its function remain preserved. Conclusion: This case report suggests that aggressive eye-sparing therapy for caruncular melanoma combining surgery, adjuvant topical chemotherapy, and external beam radiotherapy, can be an alternative for primary orbital exenteration.

Coaching doctors to improve ethical decision-making in adult hospitalized patients potentially receiving excessive treatment. The CODE stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether coaching doctors to enhance ethical decision-making in teams improves (1) goal-oriented care operationalized via written do-not-intubate and do-not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNI-DNACPR) orders in adult patients potentially receiving excessive treatment (PET) during their first hospital stay and (2) the quality of the ethical climate. METHODS: We carried out a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) and 9 referring internal medicine departments of Ghent University Hospital between February 2022 and February 2023. Doctors and nurses in charge of hospitalized patients filled out the ethical decision-making climate questionnaire (ethical decision-making climate questionnaire, EDMCQ) before and after the study, and anonymously identified PET via an electronic alert during the entire study period. All departments were randomly assigned to a 4-month coaching. At least one month of coaching was compared to less than one month coaching and usual care. The first primary endpoint was the incidence of written DNI-DNACPR decisions. The second primary endpoint was the EDMCQ before and after the study period. Because clinicians identified less PET than required to detect a difference in written DNI-DNACPR decisions, a post-hoc analysis on the overall population was performed. To reduce type I errors, we further restricted the analysis to one of our predefined secondary endpoints (mortality up to 1 year). RESULTS: Of the 442 and 423 clinicians working before and after the study period, respectively 270 (61%) and 261 (61.7%) filled out the EDMCQ. Fifty of the 93 (53.7%) doctors participated in the coaching for a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 4.36 (2.55) sessions. Of the 7254 patients, 125 (1.7%) were identified as PET, with 16 missing outcome data. Twenty-six of the PET and 624 of the overall population already had a written DNI-DNACPR decision at study entry, resulting in 83 and 6614 patients who were included in the main and post hoc analysis, respectively. The estimated incidence of written DNI-DNACPR decisions in the intervention vs. control arm was, respectively, 29.7% vs. 19.6% (odds ratio 4.24, 95% confidence interval 4.21-4.27; P < 0.001) in PET and 3.4% vs. 1.9% (1.65, 1.12-2.43; P = 0.011) in the overall study population. The estimated mortality at one year was respectively 85% vs. 83.7% (hazard ratio 2.76, 1.26-6.04; P = 0.011) and 14.5% vs. 15.1% (0.89, 0.72-1.09; P = 0.251). The mean difference in EDMCQ before and after the study period was 0.02 points (- 0.18 to 0.23; P = 0.815). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that coaching doctors regarding ethical decision-making in teams safely improves goal-oriented care operationalized via written DNI-DNACPR decisions in hospitalized patients, however without concomitantly improving the quality of the ethical climate.

Truth or dare: switching BRAF/MEK inhibitors after acute interstitial nephritis in a patient with metastatic melanoma - A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of BRAF/MEK inhibitors has significantly improved overall survival of patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma. Most patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors will experience adverse events during the course of their treatment. Kidney impairment, however, was rarely reported in the pivotal trials. To date, there are only three cases of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis associated with dabrafenib and trametinib reported in the literature. CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic melanoma was hospitalized in August 2021, 5 months after treatment initiation with dabrafenib and trametinib. He presented with acute kidney injury, with serum creatinine of 3.34 mg/dL and eGFR of 20.3 mL/min/m². Kidney biopsy revealed acute interstitial nephritis. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: He was treated with methylprednisolone 16 mg qd, and both dabrafenib and trametinib were permanently discontinued, with recuperation of his kidney function. Another BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination, encorafenib and binimetinib, was introduced, with preserved kidney function and excellent disease control. DISCUSSION: We report the first case of biopsy-proven interstitial nephritis in a patient treated with dabrafenib and trametinib, with successful introduction of another BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination. Although rare, clinicians should be aware of the risk of renal adverse events associated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Renal biopsy is mandatory in the absence of a clear explanation or rapid recovery of renal failure. In case of proven interstitial nephritis, corticosteroids should be initiated. Switching to another BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination can be considered for patients with complete recovery of renal function and limited treatment options.

Real-World Effectiveness, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Nivolumab for Melanoma in Belgium and Luxembourg: Results of PRESERV MEL.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 immuno-oncology therapy, is approved as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma. PRESERV MEL (Prospective and REtrospective Study of nivolumab thERapy in adjuVant MELanoma) is a real-world observational study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant nivolumab in patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma in clinical practice in Belgium and Luxembourg. METHODS: Patients were enrolled prospectively and retrospectively during a 2-year period (January 2019-January 2021), and will be followed for 5 years. The results reported here are for the second interim analysis (cutoff date 31 December 2021). The index date was the date of first administration of adjuvant nivolumab. Patients received nivolumab for up to 12 months per label. Outcomes included relapse-free survival (RFS), adverse events (AEs)/treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; assessed in prospectively enrolled patients using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M), and EQ-5D-3L instruments). HRQoL was evaluated at group level (mean change in scores from baseline based on minimally important differences) and individual patient level (percentage of patients with clinically important scores based on threshold of clinical importance). Outcomes were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The study enrolled 152 patients (125 prospective, 27 retrospective) at 15 hospitals in Belgium and Luxembourg. Minimum potential follow-up at time of analysis was 11.4 months. Median age was 60 years (range 29-85), and 53% of patients were male. At 12 and 18 months, the RFS rates were 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 66.9-80.9) and 68.4% (95% CI: 60.0-75.5), respectively. Median RFS was not reached. Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were reported in 14% of patients. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 23% of patients. Deaths occurred in 3% of patients and were not related to treatment. Questionnaire completion rates for HRQoL were high at baseline (90-94%) and at 24 months (78-81%). In the group-level analysis for HRQoL, mean changes in scores from baseline remained stable and did not exceed prespecified thresholds for minimally important differences during and after treatment, except for a clinically meaningful improvement in FACT-M surgery subscale scores. In the individual patient-level analysis for EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the percentages of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for fatigue and cognitive impairment increased during treatment (at 9 months) compared with baseline. After treatment cessation (at 18 months), the percentage of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for fatigue decreased. However, the percentages of patients who reported clinically relevant scores for emotional, cognitive, and social impairment increased at 18 months compared with during treatment. Most patients with emotional impairment at 9 and 18 months did not experience disease recurrence (91% and 89%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III or stage IV melanoma. Cancer-specific, disease-specific, and generic HRQoL were maintained during and after treatment. The percentage of patients reporting emotional and cognitive impairment increased after treatment cessation, emphasizing the need for further investigation and tailored supportive care in these patients.

Mental Health and Quality of Life among Patients with Cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Results from the Longitudinal ONCOVID Survey Study.

PURPOSE: This longitudinal survey study aimed to investigate the self-reported outcome measures of COVID-19 peritraumatic distress, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life (QOL), and their associated factors in a cohort of cancer patients treated at a tertiary care hospital during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: Surveys were administered at four time points between 1 April 2020 and 18 September 2020. The surveys included the CPDI, DASS-21, and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires. RESULTS: Survey response rates were high (61.0% to 79.1%). Among the 355 participants, 71.3% were female, and the median age was 62.2 years (IQR, 53.9 to 69.1). The majority (78.6%) were treated with palliative intention. An important proportion of the participants reported symptoms of COVID-19 peritraumatic distress (34.2% to 39.6%), depression (27.6% to 33.5%), anxiety (24.9% to 32.7%), and stress (11.4% to 15.7%) at any time point during the study period. We did not find clinically meaningful mental health and QOL differences during the study period, with remarkably little change in between the pandemic's first and second wave. We found no consistent correlates of mental health or QOL scores, including cancer type, therapy intention, and sociodemographic information. CONCLUSION: This cohort of cancer patients showed considerable resilience against mental health and QOL deterioration during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Translating Molecular Profiling of Soft Tissue Sarcomas into Daily Clinical Practice.

Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of rare mesenchymal tumors with more than 70 subtypes described. Treatment of these subtypes in an advanced setting is mainly according to a one-size-fits-all strategy indicating a high unmet need of new and more targeted therapeutic options in order to optimize survival. The introduction of advanced molecular techniques in cancer has led to better diagnostics and identification of new therapeutic targets, leading to more personalized treatment and improved prognosis for several cancer types. In sarcoma, a likewise evolution is seen, albeit at a slower pace. This manuscript describes how in the past years advanced molecular profiling in soft tissue sarcomas was able to identify specific and often pathognomonic aberrations, deferring standard sarcoma treatment in favor of more targeted treatment from an oncologist's point of view.

Late Lung Metastasis in a Patient with a Clear Cell Chondrosarcoma: An Indication for a Life-Long Follow-Up?

BACKGROUND: Clear cell chondrosarcoma (CCCS) is a rare subtype of chondrosarcoma and comprises between 1.6% and 2.5% of all chondrosarcoma. They are known to be chemo- and radiotherapy resistant; surgical resection is therefore the therapy of choice. METHODS: We present a 63-year-old woman with a progressive lung nodule 20 years after initial diagnosis and treatment of a clear cell chondrosarcoma of the right os naviculare. RESULTS: On serial CT scans of the chest, an asymptomatic, slowly growing nodule in the left upper lung lobe was detected. CT-guided transthoracic biopsy of this nodule confirmed the diagnosis of a chondrosarcoma lung metastasis. Video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection was performed with complete removal of the nodule. The patient recovered well from surgery and remains in good health during further follow-up. CONCLUSION: Given the tendency of clear cell chondrosarcoma to recur and metastasize after extended periods of time, a long-term, possibly life-long follow-up and clinical surveillance is advisable in these patients.

Targeting FGFR in bladder cancer: ready for clinical practice?

Objective: To give a brief literature overview of current knowledge regarding FGFR inhibition in bladder cancer.Background: The deeper molecular understanding of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) has reshaped the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of this malignancy. Rapid technological development, including the frequent use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical practice, has boosted identification and development of potential biomarkers and targeted therapies. Genetic aberrations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-pathway may drive tumorigenesis and are considered as attractive drug targets in advanced and/or metastatic UC. Several clinical trials have been performed or are ongoing to assess the safety and efficacy of (non-)selective FGFR inhibitors in patients with advanced or metatastic UC.Results: While non-selective FGFR inhibitors have shown limited clinical response with unacceptable toxicity, selective 'pan'-FGFR inhibitors had favourable response rates with manageable toxicity. To predict response, patients were screened for FGFR aberrations using NGS after DNA/RNA extraction of UC tissue specimen or collection of ctDNA or cfDNA.Conclusion: Early clinical trials have shown promising results for targeting FGFR in advanced or metastatic UC, though these findings need to be validated in phase III trials. It seems that FGFR aberrations can be detected in ctDNA and cfDNA as efficiently as in tumour tissue, showing their potential as predictive, non-invasive liquid biomarkers.