Out-of-Hospital Cold Water Immersion for Classic (Non-Exertional) Heat Stroke Guided by Real-Time Core Temperature Monitoring: A Case Series.

Heat stroke is a problem that occurs primarily in the out-of-hospital environment. "Cool first, transport second" has been emphasized in consensus statements and systematic reviews regarding the treatment of exertional heat stroke by both EMS and the sports medicine/athletic training communities. However, there remains little guidance on cooling recommendations for the out-of-hospital care of non-exertional heat stroke or classic heat stroke. There is no consensus on the safety or feasibility of cooling classic heat stroke patients in the out-of-hospital environment using cold-water immersion. This case series describes the successful application of on-scene cold-water immersion for five classic heat stroke patients guided by real-time core temperature monitoring.

Prone Dispatch-Directed CPR in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Two Successful Cases.

Historically, dispatch-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) protocols only allow chest compression instructions to be delivered for patients able to be placed in the traditional supine position. For patients who are unable to be positioned supine, the telecommunicator and caller have no option except to continue attempts to position supine, which may result in delayed or no chest compressions being delivered prior to emergency medical services arrival. Any delay or lack of bystander chest compressions may result in worsening clinical outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. We present the first two cases, to the best of our knowledge, of successfully delivered, bystander-administered, prone CPR instructions by a trained telecommunicator for two OHCA victims unable to be positioned supine.

Disparity in Receipt and Utilization of Telecommunicator CPR Instruction.

Introduction: Telecommunicator Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (T-CPR) is independently associated with improved survival and improved functional outcome after adult Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether there are racial and socioeconomic disparities in the provision of T-CPR instruction and subsequent CPR performance. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a convenience sample of EMS agencies throughout the United States that utilized the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) dispatch registry during the period 1/2014-12/2017. Data were collected by dispatch agencies after review of 9-1-1 OHCA audio recordings. Elements related to dispatcher CPR instruction, barriers to bystander CPR (BCPR) performance, patient race (White, Black, Hispanic-Latino, or other) and Utstein data were captured from the CARES database. These data were merged with census tract data from incident locations. The effects of race and income (Socioeconomic status, SES) on outcome were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression. Results: A total of 3,807 cases were identified from 37 dispatch agencies in 6 states. The sample was predominantly White (57.5%) and male (64.9%) with an average age of 60.3 ± 19.9. In the adjusted analysis, there were no differences in the odds of receiving CPR instruction by race (black vs white), OR = 0.96 (95% CI. 0.70, 1.32) or for increased income, (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99, 1.02). There was a significant difference in receipt of T-CPR instruction by patient age, OR = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98, 0.99). Subsequent utilization of T-CPR instruction to perform BCPR was less likely for patients that had a lower income, OR = 1.03 (95% CI 1.01, 1.05). There was also a decreased rate of BCPR provision by patient age OR = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99, 1.00), but there was no difference in rate of BCPR provision by race, OR = 0.86 (95% CI 0.61, 1.23). Conclusion: We identified differences in age but not race or SES in the provision of T-CPR instruction by dispatch centers. We also identified decreased CPR provision by age and income after receipt of T-CPR instructions. In this sample, we found no evidence of racial disparities in the provision of T-CPR instruction or subsequent provision of BCPR.

Two successive necrotic lesions secondary to presumed loxosceles envenomation.

Brown recluse spider (Loxosceles reclusa) envenomations with subsequent necrotic skin lesions occur infrequently, and systemic loxoscelism is rarer still. We report a case of 2 successive developing necrotic lesions, each on adjacent medial aspects of the legs, secondary to presumed Loxosceles envenomation. A 31-year-old man with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department with 2, large, necrotic lesions, 1 on each medial thigh. They had progressed over the course of 1 month from small blisters to large necrotic lesions with eschar. He underwent surgical debridement without skin grafting with no further complications. Bites from recluse spiders that progress to necrosis usually present as single lesions. The differential diagnoses for a necrotic skin lesion is large. The presence of more than 1 lesion argues against Loxosceles envenomation; however, in the absence of underlying infection, systemic diseases, immunodeficiency, or malignancy, the diagnosis must be considered if the case presents in an endemic area. Brown recluse spiders rarely bite multiple times, thus confounding the diagnosis of an already nonspecific clinical finding.

Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department.

Objectives: Recent research has helped define the complex pathways in sepsis, affording new opportunities for advancing diagnostics tests. Given significant advances in the field, a group of academic investigators from emergency medicine, intensive care, pathology, and pharmacology assembled to develop consensus around key gaps and potential future use for emerging rapid host response diagnostics assays in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods: A modified Delphi study was conducted that included 26 panelists (expert consensus panel) from multiple specialties. A smaller steering committee first defined a list of Delphi statements related to the need for and future potential use of a hypothetical sepsis diagnostic test in the ED. Likert scoring was used to assess panelists agreement or disagreement with statements. Two successive rounds of surveys were conducted and consensus for statements was operationally defined as achieving agreement or disagreement of 75% or greater. Results: Significant gaps were identified related to current tools for assessing risk of sepsis in the ED. Strong consensus indicated the need for a test providing an indication of the severity of dysregulated host immune response, which would be helpful even if it did not identify the specific pathogen. Although there was a relatively high degree of uncertainty regarding which patients would most benefit from the test, the panel agreed that an ideal host response sepsis test should aim to be integrated into ED triage and thus should produce results in less than 30 minutes. The panel also agreed that such a test would be most valuable for improving sepsis outcomes and reducing rates of unnecessary antibiotic use. Conclusion: The expert consensus panel expressed strong consensus regarding gaps in sepsis diagnostics in the ED and the potential for new rapid host response tests to help fill these gaps. These finding provide a baseline framework for assessing key attributes of evolving host response diagnostic tests for sepsis in the ED.

Anaphylaxis knowledge among paramedics: results of a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Very little is known about prehospital providers' knowledge regarding anaphylaxis care. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how well nationally registered paramedics in the United States recognize classic and atypical presentations of anaphylaxis. We also assessed knowledge regarding treatment with epinephrine, including dosing, route of administration, and perceived contraindications to epinephrine use. METHODS: This was a blinded, cross-sectional online survey of a random sample of paramedics registered by the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians that was distributed via e-mail. The survey contained two main sections: demographic data/self-assessment of confidence with anaphylaxis care and a cognitive assessment. RESULTS: A total of 3,537 paramedics completed the survey, for a 36.6% response rate. Among the respondents, 98.9% correctly recognized a case of classic anaphylaxis, whereas only 2.9% correctly identified the atypical presentation. Regarding treatment, 46.2% identified epinephrine as the initial drug of choice; 38.9% chose the intramuscular (IM) route of administration, and 60.5% identified the deltoid as the preferred location (11.6% thigh). Of the respondents, 98.0% were confident they could recognize anaphylaxis; 97.1% were confident they could manage anaphylaxis; 39.5% carry epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs) on response vehicles; 95.4% were confident they could use an EAI; and 36.2% stated that there were contraindications to epinephrine administration in anaphylactic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas a large percentage of the paramedics recognized classic anaphylaxis, a very small percentage recognized atypical anaphylaxis. Less than half chose epinephrine as the initial drug of choice, and most respondents were unable to identify the correct route/location of administration. This survey identifies a number of areas for improved education.

Out-of-hospital lingual dystonia resulting in airway obstruction.

This article discusses a case of antipsychotic-induced, focal lingual dystonia causing airway obstruction that was managed completely in the out-of-hospital environment by emergency medical services (EMS) providers. With the ever-increasing use of antipsychotic medications by the general population, it is important for EMS providers and emergency medicine physicians to be aware of rare presentations of dystonic reactions that can sometimes be life-threatening when they involve the lingual, pharyngeal, or laryngeal musculature. This article identifies the medications most likely to induce dystonic reactions, risk factors that predispose individuals to the development of dystonia, and the pathophysiology behind these adverse reactions. It also discusses differential diagnoses to consider, and emergent treatment options.

The use of epinephrine for out-of-hospital treatment of anaphylaxis: resource document for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statement.

Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening condition that requires both prompt recognition and treatment with epinephrine. All levels of emergency medical services (EMS) providers, with appropriate physician oversight, should be able to carry and properly administer epinephrine safely when caring for patients with anaphylaxis. EMS systems and EMS medical directors should develop a mechanism to review the charts of patients who received epinephrine and were not in cardiac arrest. This will help to ensure the safe and appropriate use of epinephrine in order to provide continued quality improvement. Despite the safety of epinephrine, EMS systems that carry epinephrine autoinjectors should establish protocols to deal with patients or emergency responders who have an unintentional injection of epinephrine into the hand or digit. Continued research is needed to better define the role that EMS plays in the management of anaphylaxis. This paper serves as a resource document to the National Association of EMS Physician position on the use of epinephrine for the out-of-hospital treatment of anaphylaxis. Key words: EMS; prehospital; anaphylaxis; epinephrine; intramuscular epinephrine.

A case of unrecognized prehospital anaphylactic shock.

Abstract A case of prehospital anaphylactic shock that presented atypically, without a known exposure, is discussed. Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that requires prompt recognition and aggressive treatment. While there is little diagnostic dilemma (specifically used in the conclusion section of this paper) in the recognition and management of "classic" presentations of anaphylaxis there is likely a need for further education of prehospital providers, as well as emergency physicians, on how to recognize atypical cases of anaphylaxis. These cases can be equally severe, with potentially fatal consequences if missed. The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis are reviewed, as well as barriers that providers encounter in diagnosing uncommon presentations.

CODE BLUE-19: Proposal to Mitigate COVID-19 Transmission in the Emergency Department for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Resuscitation of cardiac arrest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients places the healthcare staff at higher risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Unfortunately, COVID-19 status is unknown in most patients presenting to the emergency department (ED), and therefore special attention must be given to protect the healthcare staff along with the other patients. This is particularly true for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who are transported to the ED. Based on the current data available on transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2, we have proposed a protocolized approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests to limit risk of transmission.