RESUMO
With ongoing interest in rising Medicare Advantage enrollment, we examined whether the growth in enrollment between 2006 and 2011 was mainly due to new beneficiaries choosing Medicare Advantage when they first become eligible for Medicare. We also examined the extent to which beneficiaries in traditional Medicare switched to Medicare Advantage, and vice versa. We found that 22 percent of new Medicare beneficiaries elected Medicare Advantage over traditional Medicare in 2011; they accounted for 48 percent of new Medicare Advantage enrollees that year. People ages 65-69 switched from traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage at higher-than-average rates. Dual eligibles (people eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid) and beneficiaries younger than age sixty-five with disabilities disenrolled from Medicare Advantage at higher-than-average rates. On average, in each year of the study period we found that fewer than 5 percent of traditional Medicare beneficiaries switched to Medicare Advantage, and a similar percentage of Medicare Advantage enrollees switched to traditional Medicare. These results suggest that initial coverage decisions have long-lasting effects.
Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Medicare Part C/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part C/tendências , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/tendências , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo/tendências , Feminino , Previsões , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Medicare Part C/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Dinâmica Populacional/tendências , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde/tendênciasRESUMO
Interest in the economics of trachoma is high because of the refinement of a strategy to control trachomatous blindness, an ongoing global effort to eliminate incident blindness from trachoma by 2020, and an azithromycin donation program that is a component of trachoma control programs in several countries. This report comments on the economic distribution of blindness from trachoma and adds insight to published data on the burden of trachoma and the comparative costs and effects of trachoma control. Results suggest that 1) trichiasis without visual impairment may result in an economic burden comparable to trachomatous low vision and blindness so that 2) the monetary burden of trachoma may be 50% higher than conservative, published figures; 3) within some regions more productive economies are associated with less national blindness from trachoma; and 4) the ability to achieve a positive net benefit of trachoma control depends importantly on the cost per dose of antibiotic.
Assuntos
Cegueira/prevenção & controle , Tracoma/economia , Antibacterianos/economia , Cegueira/economia , Cegueira/etiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Avaliação da Deficiência , Saúde Global , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Pobreza/economia , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Tracoma/complicações , Tracoma/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Coordinating care for the nine million elderly or disabled and low-income people who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid is a pressing policy issue. To support the debate over this issue, we synthesized public data on how services are provided to dual eligibles receiving covered benefits in both programs. Our analysis confirmed that most dual-eligible beneficiaries receive benefits separately for each program through fee-for-service arrangements. Their enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid managed care is growing but still low, with highly uneven experiences across states. Few states or health plans have experience with coordinating care for dual eligibles within an integrated plan. These findings reinforce the need for caution in considering policies that would rapidly give states the responsibility for coordinating dual eligibles' care and coverage. We also found data gaps that warrant prompt attention in order to provide national-level oversight and improve the evidence base for debating and tracking policy changes.