RESUMO
Despite the unmet needs of patients living with cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) deficiency disorder (CDD) and the challenges facing a rare population with small patient numbers, now is a time of unprecedented opportunities to turn scientific breakthroughs into safe and effective treatments for families of CDD patients. New data collected for over a decade and an evolution in genetics technologies have resulted in transformational new treatments currently in development for CDD. This progress is in great part due to the patient advocacy efforts early on to drive development of stakeholder research tools necessary to de-risk industry entry into the CDD space, family participation in longitudinal natural history studies, and a robust caregiver-reported database. Cumulatively, these efforts offered new insights into CDD, specifically patterns in disease progression, helped identify the most burdensome symptoms to patients and caregivers, improved clinical trial design, and reduced financial barriers for therapeutic development for potential industry partners. This paper documents the growth of a small patient community through relationship building and collaboration. The International Foundation for CDKL5 Research is mindful of ongoing challenges namely the long research timelines, high development and production costs, and inequitable access to approved therapies. Therefore, sustaining strong early resources while recognizing opportunities that engagement, advocacy, and funding can accelerate progress remains at the heart of the agile foundation strategy.
Recognizing inflection points throughout the growth of a patient advocacy group: remaining mission focused while pivoting to achieve foundation goals Effectively operating a rare disease patient advocacy foundation presents obstacles that are difficult to anticipate, yet there is silver lining in learning from opportunities lost to regroup and refocus on our mission. The IFCR initially formed to drive research forward and support families while fostering new scientists to study the disorder. This remains the core objective and the organization has successfully contributed to the development of a robust CDD community and important research assets to facilitated research progress. On the heels of the first approved treatment for CDD, we find ourselves contemplating our future in a much different light, asking propelling questions and making tough decisions. Given the constraints that most rare disease communities face, how can we best use limited resources? How can we partner with others to realize timely progress? What gaps exist that require CDD family thought leadership and engagement along the continuum of drug development? Reflecting on past years, it is remarkable how fast science is moving. Genetic therapies are under early development for CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder. We must prepare for any future we are afforded to trial disease-modifying treatments. Multistakeholder engagement is required pre-clinically, during clinical trials and post approval.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pathologic mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 cause CDKL5 deficiency disorder, a genetic syndrome associated with severe epilepsy and cognitive, motor, visual, and autonomic disturbances. This disorder is a relatively common genetic cause of early-life epilepsy. A specific severity assessment is lacking, required to monitor the clinical course and needed to define the natural history and for clinical trial readiness. METHODS: A severity assessment was developed based on clinical and research experience from the International Foundation for CDKL5 Research Centers of Excellence consortium and the National Institutes of Health Rett and Rett-Related Disorders Natural History Study consortium. An initial draft severity assessment was presented and reviewed at the annual CDKL5 Forum meeting (Boston, 2017). Subsequently it was iterated through four cycles of a modified Delphi process by a group of clinicians, researchers, industry, patient advisory groups, and parents familiar with this disorder until consensus was achieved. The revised version of the severity assessment was presented for review, comment, and piloting to families at the International Foundation for CDKL5 Research-sponsored family meeting (Colorado, 2018). Final revisions were based on this additional input. RESULTS: The final severity assessment comprised 51 items that comprehensively describe domains of epilepsy; motor; cognition, behavior, vision, and speech; and autonomic functions. Parental ratings of therapy effectiveness and child and family functioning are also included. CONCLUSIONS: A severity assessment was rapidly developed with input from multiple stakeholders. Refinement through ongoing validation is required for future clinical trials. The consensus methods employed for the development of severity assessment may be applicable to similar rare disorders.