Evaluation of a new point of care automated complete blood count (CBC) analyzer in various clinical settings.

BACKGROUND: WBC counts and differentials are currently performed on complex analyzers in either central or satellite laboratories. Rapid and easy to use point of care (POC) CBC testing can benefit certain outpatient clinical settings, where the greatest clinical need has been demonstrated. METHODS: We evaluated a new POC CBC analyzer Chempaq XBC (Chempaq A/S, Denmark) for hemoglobin, leukocyte counts and 3-part differentials and compared the results with established laboratory based Beckman Coulter LH750 analyzers. The performance of these POC analyzers was tested at multiple clinic locations as a part of regular care on both venous and finger stick blood samples. RESULTS: Method validation parameters including precision, accuracy and linearity studies are within the acceptable limits between POC and lab based analyzers. Method comparison studies at various locations showed good correlation at various clinical settings including ER, primary care, Ob/Gyn, ICU, Pedi clinic, Hematology-Oncology clinics, and in-patient ward's in venous blood samples. In addition, at the hematology-oncology clinic, the comparisons of venous as well as finger stick blood sample analyses showed good correlation. CONCLUSION: The Chempaq XBC analyzer provides accurate hematologic results that can facilitate rapid quantitative assessment of CBC parameters and thus is clinically relevant, especially in outreach clinic settings and in critically ill patients.

Accuracy evaluation of a new glucometer with automated hematocrit measurement and correction.

BACKGROUND: Blood glucose meters are widely used in point of care testing, however, many studies have shown inaccuracies in the glucose measurement due to a number of factors. The present study evaluated the accuracy of a new glucometer capable of simultaneous measurement of patient's hematocrit with algorithmic adjustment of glucose result. This meter was compared with a reference method and 2 other existing meters widely used in the market. METHODS: Venous whole blood samples from healthy volunteers were pooled and reconstituted to produce 5 different hematocrit (30-60%) concentrations. Each hematocrit specimen was spiked to produce 4 different glucose (50-500 mg/dl) concentrations. RESULTS: Hematocrit measured by the new meter correlated well with the reference method. Mean percentage error differences, compared to the reference method, showed obvious differences between existing meters across the wide hematocrit range at various glucose concentrations. The new meter showed a steady and consistent glucose concentrations compared to the reference method. CONCLUSION: The new glucometer, which simultaneously measures hematocrit and performs automated correction for the hematocrit effect, provides a glucose result with improved accuracy. Its measurement of hematocrit from the same blood sample will eliminate the need for additional collection of blood or measurement using another method.