Spontaneous Perforation of Meckel's Diverticulum in a Young Adult Male: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Meckel's diverticulum, a congenital defect that affects about 2% of the population, is a remnant of the embryologic vitelline duct. Perforated Meckel's diverticulum, a rare consequence of an already rare disease process, frequently presents and is diagnosed as a perforated appendix. We report a case of a 28-year-old male who presented with a two-day history of right-sided lower abdominal pain associated with nausea. The abdominal examination revealed a soft, nondistended abdomen with tenderness in the right iliac fossa. A CT scan of the abdomen showed a normal appendix and inflammation of Meckel's diverticulum without any signs of perforation. Bowel exploration through a small midline incision indicated the presence of a highly inflamed Meckel's diverticulum with localized perforation 75 cm from the ileocecal valve. A resection of 15 cm of the small bowel and an end-to-end primary anastomosis were performed. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery and was discharged after a five-day admission to a surgical ward. This case report illustrates the significance of keeping Meckel's diverticulum as a differential diagnosis in all the patients who present with an acute abdomen.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Image-Guided and Laparoscopic Cholecystostomies in High-Risk Patients With Acute Calculus Cholecystitis: A Five-Year District General Hospital Experience.

Introduction Acute cholecystitis (AC), inflammation of the gall bladder, is one of the most common emergency surgical presentations. In the UK, approximately 15% of the population is estimated to have gallstones, and approximately 20% of them can develop AC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the definitive management of AC. However, cholecystectomy carries a very high risk of morbidity and mortality in high-risk frail patients with multiple comorbidities who are deemed unfit for surgery. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), both image-guided and laparoscopic, is generally acknowledged as an interim treatment measure before definitive management, which is the LC. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study from the Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, a district general hospital (DGH) based in Wigan, UK. The medical records of all the patients who were admitted to the surgical department and underwent PC between January 2017 and December 2022 were analyzed. Patients with previous hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) malignancy, who underwent open cholecystostomy, or those with abdominal ascites were excluded from the study. Information was collected regarding the age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grades, success rates of both procedures as temporary or definitive management, duration of hospital stay, 30-day and 1-year mortality after the procedure, timing of the procedure, and long-term complications after the procedure, particularly those related to cholecystostomy tube dislodgment or blockage. Results Twenty-seven patients who underwent PC were divided into two groups: group A, consisting of 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystostomies, and group B, consisting of 17 patients who had ultrasound (US)-guided cholecystostomies. The mean age of the patients in group A was 66.7 as compared to 75.1 in group B. Most of the patients were in ASA groups III (14) and IV (10). About 74% of patients had procedures done during the day and 26% had PC at night time. The mean hospital stay was 13.5 days. About 55% of patients had planned elective LC as a definitive management. Following the treatment, two patients died within 30 days, and eight patients passed away within a year. About 40% of the patients had complications related to the tube dislodgment and blockage. Conclusion This study concludes that PC, using both laparoscopic and US-guided techniques, can serve as an interim as well as a definitive measure, particularly in patients who are at high risk for anesthesia and the procedure itself and have multiple comorbidities.

Role of robotic approach in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): A systematic review of the literature.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become standard surgical treatment of choice in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in which the medical management fails. Despite the wide use of laparoscopic method, the enhanced and innovative features that come with the robotic platform, such as endo-wrist technology, 3D visualization, surgeon-controlled camera and motion scaling, make it an appealing choice. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of robotic approach for proctectomy or proctocolectomy with IPAA as compared to conventional laparoscopic approach. A systematic review was completed for studies done between 2010 and 2022 comparing the robotic approach with the laparoscopic approach. Nine studies were found to be feasible to be included in this review. In terms of the outcomes, although the mean operating time was slightly higher than the laparoscopic approach, the other outcomes, such as mean blood loss, return of the bowel movement, mean hospital stay, and conversion to open, were found to be significantly lower in the robotic approach as compared to both laparoscopic and conventional open techniques. Despite the overall increased rate of complications combined from all the studies, the rate of significant complications such as anastomotic leaks requiring readmission and return to theater was also found to be substantially less. This study concludes that although robotic approach is in its initial stages for pelvic surgeries, it can be safely employed due to improved dexterity and visibility.

A Good Medical Practice of the Patients' Right to Information: An Audit Cycle of Patient Understanding and Satisfaction With Information Provided to Patients With Acute Pancreatitis.

Introduction Acute pancreatitis (AP), characterized by the inflammation of the pancreas, is a common acute surgical condition accounting for approximately 3% of all surgical admissions with abdominal pain and has an incidence of approximately 56 cases per 100,000 population every year. The General Medical Council (GMC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and Royal College of Nursing best practice guidelines recommend that such patients and their family members should be provided with both verbal and written information about acute pancreatitis and its management in a way that they can understand. The aim of this audit cycle was to find out the compliance with information provided to patients with acute pancreatitis as per the GMC good medical practice and NICE guidelines and assess their satisfaction. Method A closed-loop audit consisting of two cycles was carried out. Thirty patients who were admitted to the department of general surgery with acute pancreatitis were provided with a questionnaire containing 11 questions asking about the information provided to them about their condition by healthcare professionals; then, interventions were carried out in the form of developing patient information leaflets (PILs) and encouraging healthcare professionals to distribute them and provide information to the patients and their family members. Results Overall, improvements were seen in all aspects of the information being provided to patients, and particularly, more than 100% improvement was seen in patient satisfaction related to the information provided to them in the second cycle after the implementation of interventions. Conclusions This study concludes that patients should be given all the information they require in accordance with their right to information, in line with GMC best practice, NICE, and Royal College of Nursing best practice guidelines. A very effective way to improve the health outcomes and satisfaction of patients is to give them access to a patient information leaflet, which can allow patients to consider their options and understand what can happen during treatment, especially when doctors have limited time to carry out detailed discussions with the patient.

Preparedness of the Healthcare Personnel Against the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak: An Audit Cycle.

With the increasing spread and mortality of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, it is essential for the healthcare community to be prepared per the international standards. This study is focused on assessing the preparedness of healthcare personnel and the effectiveness of an educational intervention to improve this preparedness in those dealing with the COVID-19 infection. A prospective, multicenter audit cycle was conducted on 400 healthcare professionals (271 junior doctors, 90 nurses, 39 non-clinical hospital workers) sampled through stratified random sampling. A questionnaire that was based on "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC's) checklist for healthcare personnel's preparedness for transport and arrival of patients with confirmed or possible COVID-19" was sent to the participants after which an informative document, framed on the information provided by World Health Organization (WHO), CDC, and local guidelines from the Government of Pakistan's website, was distributed through social media platforms. The questionnaire was repeated after 2 weeks to close the audit loop. Chi-Square test and paired sample t-test were used to test significance. In the pre-intervention portion of the study, it was found out that the doctors and nurses had higher knowledge scores compared to the non-clinical hospital staff (p ≤ 0.05). A statistically significant improvement was seen after the educational intervention was deployed (p ≤ 0.05). The study concludes that the non-clinical staff, being a vital part of the healthcare framework, need to be educated and effective approaches for official inclusion of relevant information need to be incorporated into clinical practice to limit the transmission of COVID-19.