Feasibility and Acceptability of the HOME Program for Veterans Recently Discharged from a Psychiatric Hospitalization.

Enrollment in the Home-Based Mental Health Evaluation (HOME) Program is associated with higher rates of treatment engagement following psychiatric hospitalization discharge, as compared to enhanced care as usual. We aim to describe feasibility and acceptability data related to implementation of the HOME Program at two Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) to inform future program refinement and implementation. Process evaluation data regarding feasibility and acceptability were collected in the context of an interventional multi-site trial. Data regarding enrollment in the study and the intervention were collected by study staff. Additional acceptability and feasibility data were obtained via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8) and Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview (NEII). Between 82 and 91% of enrolled Veterans participated in at least one post-discharge telephone contact. Site differences existed with respect to completion of home visits. CSQ-8 results suggested high levels of satisfaction with the HOME Program. Themes identified via the NEII reflect that as a result of participation in the HOME Program, Veterans felt hopeful and cared for and learned how to keep themselves safe following hospital discharge. Process evaluation data from a clinical trial of the HOME Program demonstrated that the intervention was feasible to implement at two VAMCs and was acceptable to participants. These data inform considerations for future research and implementation efforts.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03347552.

Impact of Implementation Facilitation on the REACH VET Clinical Program for Veterans at Risk for Suicide.

OBJECTIVE: In 2017, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national suicide prevention program, called Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), that uses a predictive algorithm to identify, attempt to reach, assess, and care for patients at the highest risk for suicide. The authors aimed to evaluate whether facilitation enhanced implementation of REACH VET at VHA facilities not meeting target completion rates. METHODS: In this hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 2 program evaluation, a quasi-experimental pre-post design was used to assess changes in implementation outcome measures evaluated 6 months before and 6 months after onset of facilitation of REACH VET implementation at 23 VHA facilities. Measures included percentages of patients with documented coordinator and provider acknowledgment of receipt, care evaluation, and outreach attempt. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare differences in REACH VET outcome measures before and after facilitation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with personnel and were explored via template analysis. RESULTS: Time had a significant effect in all outcomes models (p<0.001). An effect of facilitation was significant only for the outcome of attempted outreach. Patients identified by REACH VET had significantly higher odds of having a documented outreach attempt after facilitation of REACH VET implementation, compared with before facilitation. Site personnel felt supported and reported that the external facilitators were helpful and responsive. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitation of REACH VET implementation was associated with an improvement in outreach attempts to veterans identified as being at increased risk for suicide. Outreach is critical for engaging veterans in care.