Cranial and large vessel activity on positron emission tomography scan at diagnosis and 6 months in giant cell arteritis.

AIM: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect cranial and large vessel inflammation in giant cell arteritis (GCA). We aimed to determine the change and significance of vascular activity at diagnosis and 6 months. METHOD: Newly diagnosed GCA patients underwent time-of-flight fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/CT from vertex to diaphragm within 72 hours of commencing corticosteroids and were followed for 12 months. A 6 months scan was performed in patients with inflammatory features on biopsy or CT aortitis. Vascular uptake was visually graded by 2 blinded readers across 18 artery segments from 0 (no increased uptake) to 3 (very marked uptake). Scores were summed to give a total vascular score (TVS). RESULTS: We enrolled 21 GCA patients and 15 underwent the serial scan. Twelve (57%) patients experienced a relapse and 5 of these had ischemic features of vision disturbance, jaw or limb claudication. The median TVS fell from 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-24) at baseline to 5 (IQR 0-10) at 6 months (P < .01) with reduction in both cranial and large artery scores. While the overall relapse rate was similar between patients with a high (≥10) and low baseline TVS, patients with high scores were numerically more likely to experience an ischemic relapse (33% vs 11%, P = .34). Five out of 15 patients had persistent uptake in at least 1 vessel on the serial PET/CT but none experienced a subsequent relapse. CONCLUSION: Vascular activity decreased in cranial and large arteries between diagnosis and 6 months. Persistent activity did not predict subsequent relapse.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography of the Head, Neck, and Chest for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has not been well studied as a first-line test for giant cell arteritis (GCA), due, in part, to historical limitations in visualizing the cranial arteries. The Giant Cell Arteritis and PET Scan (GAPS) study was therefore carried out to assess the accuracy of a newer generation PET/CT of the head, neck, and chest for determining a diagnosis of GCA. METHODS: In the GAPS study cohort, 64 patients with newly suspected GCA underwent time-of-flight PET/CT (1-mm slice thickness from the vertex to diaphragm) within 72 hours of starting glucocorticoids and before undergoing temporal artery biopsy (TAB). Two physicians with experience in PET reviewed the patients' scans in a blinded manner and reported the scans as globally positive or negative for GCA. Tracer uptake was graded across 18 artery segments. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed at 6 months' follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 58 of 64 patients underwent TAB, and 12 (21%) of the biopsies were considered positive for GCA. Twenty-one patients had a clinical diagnosis of GCA. Compared to TAB, the sensitivity of PET/CT for a diagnosis of GCA was 92% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 62-100%) and specificity was 85% (95% CI 71-94%). The negative predictive value (NPV) was 98% (95% CI 87-100%). Compared to clinical diagnosis, PET/CT had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI 48-89%) and specificity of 91% (95% CI 78-97%). Interobserver reliability was moderate (κ = 0.65). Among the enrolled patients, 20% had a clinically relevant incidental finding, including 7 with an infection and 5 with a malignancy. Furthermore, 5 (42%) of 12 TAB-positive GCA patients had moderate or marked aortitis. CONCLUSION: The high diagnostic accuracy of this PET/CT protocol would support its use as a first-line test for GCA. The NPV of 98% indicates the particular utility of this test in ruling out the condition in patients considered to be at lower risk of GCA. PET/CT had benefit over TAB in detecting vasculitis mimics and aortitis.