Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
1.
J Urol ; 207(6): 1207-1213, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35080472

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We evaluated the association between intravesical prostate protrusion (IPP) and the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion targeted biopsy (TB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 538 consecutive men who underwent MRI-TRUS fusion TB and concomitant systematic biopsy were evaluated. IPP on MRI was independently measured by 4 blinded reviewers. The primary outcome was per-lesion detection of csPCa on TB. We assessed the association between IPP and csPCa detection on TB, controlling for age, prostate specific antigen, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System® (PI-RADS®) score, prostate volume, targeted cores sampled and previous biopsy experience. RESULTS: A total of 847 PI-RADS 3 or greater lesions were targeted across 570 biopsies. Intra- and interrater reliability for measuring IPP was strong. A total of 81 (14.2%), 127 (22.3%), 237 (41.6%) and 125 (21.9%) men had 0, small, medium and large IPP, respectively. A total of 230, 392 and 196 lesions were PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Of the lesions 198 (34.7%) had csPCa on TB. The overall relationship between IPP size and csPCa found on TB was not significant; however, large IPP is associated with a significantly lower rate of csPCa detection than 0 IPP (p=0.007). Every mm increase in IPP is associated with a 5.6% decrease in the odds of csPCa detection on TB (p=0.004) and a 66.5% decrease in odds of detection in large IPP compared to 0 IPP (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: As the size of the IPP and volume increase, there is a decrease in the detection rate of csPCa on MRI-guided TB. These findings may be driven by poor MRI-TRUS co-registration and prostate asymmetry.


Assuntos
Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
J Urol ; 199(5): 1289-1295, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29221931

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Precise preoperative characterization of urethral stricture is important for surgical planning. A period of urethral rest by a suprapubic cystostomy tube may aid in stricture characterization and affect the surgical approach. In this study fellowship trained reconstructive urologists compared the radiographic characterization of anterior urethral strictures before and after a period of urethral rest. We then determined how this changed the planned operative approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried our prospectively maintained urethroplasty database at our institution for men with an anterior urethral stricture who underwent retrograde urethrogram and voiding cystourethrogram before and after preoperative suprapubic cystostomy tube placement. A total of 29 men were identified for analysis. To minimize responder fatigue 20 pairs of radiographs were selected at random. All images before and after suprapubic tube placement were interpreted in random order by 11 fellowship trained reconstructive urologists. Interpretation included stricture length, diameter, location and surgeon operative plan. Preplacement and post-placement results were compared. Post-placement stricture length was also compared to intraoperative length. ICC was used to evaluate homogeneity among the urologists. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine the association of post-radiographic length after tube placement with intraoperative stricture length. RESULTS: Imaging agreement among interpreting urologists was satisfactory (ICC 0.72). There was no statistically significant difference in stricture length before vs after suprapubic tube placement. Of the images 23% were considered obliterative before tube placement while 58% were obliterative after placement (p = 0.0005). Mean ± SD post-placement radiographic and intraoperative stricture length was 3.0 ± 2.6 and 3.8 ± 3.3 cm, respectively (p <0.0001). Deviation between the radiographic and intraoperative lengths increased with stricture length (slope 0.26, p = 0.0023). The surgeon operative plan changed 47% of the time, including to an excision approach in 37% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Despite optimal urethral imaging with a suprapubic tube in men with high grade stricture reconstructive urologists underestimated length by an average of almost 1 cm. This underestimation was less for shorter strictures and it increased with stricture length. In addition, a period of urethral rest resulted in more frequent stricture obliteration, which was associated with a change in the planned operative approach about half of the time. If urologists do not place a suprapubic cystostomy tube prior to urethroplasty for high grade stricture, the operative plan should account for the stricture being tighter than it may appear.


Assuntos
Cistostomia/métodos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Urografia/métodos , Cistostomia/instrumentação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagem , Uretra/cirurgia , Estreitamento Uretral/diagnóstico por imagem , Cateteres Urinários
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(3): 720-728, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29282601

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Improved multimodality rectal cancer treatment has increased the use of sphincter-preserving surgery. This study sought to determine whether African American (AA) patients with rectal cancer receive sphincter-preserving surgery at the same rate as non-AA patients. METHODS: The study used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for years 1998-2012 to compare AA and non-AA patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. The logistic regression model was used to adjust for age, gender, admission type, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and hospital factors such as size, location (urban vs.rural), teaching status, and procedure volume. RESULTS: The search identified 22,697 patients, 1600 of whom were identified as AA. After adjustment for age and gender, the analysis showed that AA patients were less likely to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery than non-AA patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.78; p < 0.0001). After further adjustment for the Elixhauser comorbidity index, admission type, hospital-specific factors, and insurance status, the analysis showed that AA patients still were less likely to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.87; p < 0.0001). Although the proportion of non-AA patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery increased during the study period (p = 0.0003), this trend was not significant for the AA patients (p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: In this data analysis, the AA patients with rectal cancer had lower rates of sphincter-preserving surgery than the non-AA patients, even after adjustment for patient- and hospital-specific factors. Further work is required to elucidate why. Eliminating racial disparities in rectal cancer treatment should continue to be a priority for the surgical community.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Retais/etnologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Urol ; 197(2): 342-349, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27596691

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Active surveillance protocols track low risk prostate cancer progression over time. However, given the lack of uniform criteria for managing low risk prostate cancer, men who qualify for active surveillance might have less intensive surveillance and, thus, experience poorer outcomes. In this study we examined racial disparities in the frequency and intensity of active surveillance between African-American and Caucasian men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the linked SEER-Medicare data set we identified 13,374 men with low risk prostate cancer (defined by the D'Amico criteria) diagnosed from 2004 to 2009 and then followed through 2011. A total of 2,916 men did not receive any treatment (radiation, hormonal therapy or surgery) within 1 year after diagnosis. Men were considered to be on active surveillance if they had at least 1 of the following 3 surveillance strategies within 2 years after diagnosis, namely 1 or more prostate biopsies, 4 or more prostate specific antigen tests, and/or 4 or more visits to the doctor with prostate cancer listed as the diagnosis. To compare the frequency of active surveillance between the groups (African-American vs Caucasian) we used the chi-square test. To estimate the odds ratio of active surveillance we used multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for possible confounders such as year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status and Charlson score. RESULTS: Of the 2,916 untreated men 1,141 (39%), including 963 (37%) Caucasian men and 178 (58%) African-American men (p <0.0001), did not undergo any of the 3 surveillance strategies but instead were essentially on watchful waiting. Caucasian men (vs African-American) were more likely to be on active surveillance, with 1,646 (63.1%) vs 129 (42.0%) opting for 1 surveillance strategy (p <0.0001), 783 (30.0%) vs 50 (16.3%) opting for any 2 strategies (p <0.0001) and 193 (7.4%) vs 11 (3.6%) going through all 3 (p=0.01). On multivariable analysis African-American men had significantly lower odds of being on active surveillance than Caucasian men (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.67). Men with more comorbidities (Charlson score 1 or greater) had significantly higher odds of being placed on active surveillance than watchful waiting (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.46-2.12). CONCLUSIONS: Among those not treated for low risk prostate cancer, Caucasian men were placed on active surveillance more frequently than African-American men, who often defaulted to de facto watchful waiting after an initial period of active surveillance. This discrepancy raises questions about the factors favoring watchful waiting over active surveillance. Moreover, given the lack of consensus regarding the most efficient active surveillance strategy, we anticipate that racial disparities in the use of active surveillance will persist, especially in African-American patients.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
5.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 60(7): 682-690, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28594717

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment modalities for rectal cancer, including radiation, are associated with urinary adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of surgery and radiation therapy for rectal cancer on long-term urinary complications. DESIGN: Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data set from the United States, patients with rectal cancer older than 66 years of age who underwent rectal resection between 1992 and 2007 were stratified into treatment groups that accounted for surgical resection and the timing of radiation therapy, if used. A control group of patients who did not have rectal cancer were matched by age, sex, demographics, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was a urinary adverse event defined as a relevant urinary diagnosis with an associated procedure. Patients with rectal cancer in different treatment groups were compared with control patients using a propensity-adjusted, multivariable Cox regression analysis. SETTINGS: The study was conducted with the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data set from the United States at our institution. RESULTS: Of the 11,068 patients with rectal cancer, 56.2% had surgical resection alone, 21.7% received preoperative radiation, and 22.1% received postoperative radiation. The median follow-up for all of the groups of patients was >2 years. All of the groups of patients with rectal cancer were more likely to develop a urinary adverse event compared with control subjects. Adjusted HRs were 2.28 (95% CI, 2.02-2.57) for abdominoperineal resection alone, 2.24 (95% CI, 1.79-2.80) for preoperative radiation and surgical resection, 2.04 (95% CI, 1.70-2.44) for surgical resection and postoperative radiation, and 1.69 (95% CI, 1.52-1.89) for low anterior resection alone. LIMITATIONS: Treatment patterns are somewhat outdated, with a large proportion of patients receiving postoperative radiation. The data did not allow for accurate assessment of urinary tract infections or mild urinary retention that is not managed with a procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer surgery with or without radiation is associated with a higher risk of urinary complications requiring procedures. Patients who undergo low anterior resection without radiation tend toward the lowest risk for a urinary adverse event.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Radioterapia , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Doenças Urológicas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cistite/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER , Obstrução Ureteral/epidemiologia , Fístula Urinária/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Retenção Urinária/epidemiologia
6.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 17(1): 93, 2017 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28693428

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To illustrate the 10-year risks of urinary adverse events (UAEs) among men diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated with different types of therapy, accounting for the competing risk of death. METHODS: Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy among adult males in the United States. Few studies have reported the long-term post-treatment risk of UAEs and those that have, have not appropriately accounted for competing deaths. This paper conducts an inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weighted competing risks analysis to estimate the effects of different prostate cancer treatments on the risk of UAE, using a matched-cohort of prostate cancer/non-cancer control patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Medicare database. RESULTS: Study dataset included men age 66 years or older that are 83% white and had a median follow-up time of 4.14 years. Patients that underwent combination radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy experienced the highest risk of UAE (IPT-weighted competing risks: HR 3.65 with 95% CI (3.28, 4.07); 10-yr. cumulative incidence = 36.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that IPT-weighted competing risks analysis provides an accurate estimator of the cumulative incidence of UAE taking into account the competing deaths as well as measured confounding bias.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Doenças Urológicas/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estreitamento Uretral/diagnóstico , Estreitamento Uretral/epidemiologia , Estreitamento Uretral/etiologia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico , Doenças Urológicas/epidemiologia
7.
Int Braz J Urol ; 43(1): 104-111, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27649113

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Ureteral obstruction in cervical cancer occurs in up to 11% of patients, many of whom undergo ureteral stenting. Our aim was to describe the patient burden of chronic ureteral stenting in a population-based cohort by detailing two objectives: (1) the frequency of repeat procedures for ureteral obstruction; and, (2) the frequency of urinary adverse effects (UAEs) (e.g., lower urinary tract symptoms, flank pain). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From SEER-Medicare, we identified 202 women who underwent ureteral stent placement prior to or following cervical cancer treatment. The frequency of repeat procedures and rate ratios were compared between treatment modalities. The rates and rate ratios of UAEs were compared between our primary cohort (stent + cervical cancer) and the following groups: no stent + cervical cancer, stent + no cancer, and no stent + no cancer. The "no cancer" group was drawn from the 5% Medicare sample. RESULTS: 117/202 women (58%) underwent >1 stent procedure. The frequency of additional procedures was significantly higher in patients who received radiation as part of their treatment. UAEs were very common in women with stent + cancer. The rate of UTI was 190 (per 100 person-years), 67 for LUTS, 42 for stones, and 6 for flank pain. These rates were 3-10 fold higher than in the no stent + no cancer control group; rates were also higher than in the no stent + cancer and the stent + no cancer women. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of disease associated with ureteral stents is higher than expected and urologists should be actively involved in stent management, screening for associated symptoms and offering definitive reconstruction when appropriate.


Assuntos
Stents/efeitos adversos , Obstrução Ureteral/etiologia , Obstrução Ureteral/terapia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Dor no Flanco/etiologia , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureter/cirurgia
8.
J Urol ; 195(5): 1459-1463, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26682759

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Bladder outlet obstruction after prostate cancer therapy imposes a significant burden on health and quality of life in men. Our objective was to describe the burden of bladder outlet obstruction after prostate cancer therapy by detailing the type of procedures performed and how often those procedures were repeated in men with recurrent bladder outlet obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results)-Medicare linked data from 1992 to 2007 with followup through 2009 we identified 12,676 men who underwent at least 1 bladder outlet obstruction procedure after prostate cancer therapy, including external beam radiotherapy in 3,994, brachytherapy in 1,485, brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy in 1,847, radical prostatectomy in 4,736, radical prostatectomy plus external beam radiotherapy in 369 and cryotherapy in 245. Histogram, incidence rates and Cox proportional hazards models with repeat events analysis were done to describe the burden of repeat bladder outlet obstruction treatments stratified by prostate cancer therapy type. We describe the type of bladder outlet obstruction surgery grouped by level of invasiveness. RESULTS: At a median followup of 8.8 years 44.6% of men underwent 2 or more bladder outlet obstruction procedures. Compared to men who underwent radical prostatectomy those treated with brachytherapy and brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy were at increased adjusted risk for repeat bladder outlet obstruction treatment (HR 1.2 and 1.32, respectively, each p <0.05). After stricture incision the men treated with radical prostatectomy or radical prostatectomy plus external beam radiotherapy were most likely to undergo dilation at a rate of 34.7% to 35.0%. Stricture resection/ablation was more common after brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy at a rate of 28.9% to 41.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the men with bladder outlet obstruction after prostate cancer therapy undergo more than 1 procedure. Furthermore men with bladder outlet obstruction after radiotherapy undergo more invasive endoscopic therapies and are at higher risk for multiple treatments than men with bladder outlet obstruction after radical prostatectomy.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Idoso , Terapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia
9.
World J Urol ; 34(10): 1397-403, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26914817

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer remains a common disease that is frequently treated with multimodal therapy. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of treatment of the primary tumor on survival in men who go onto receive chemotherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: Using surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER)-Medicare data from 1992 to 2009, we identified a cohort of 1614 men who received chemotherapy for prostate cancer. Primary outcomes were prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM). We compared survival among men who had previously undergone radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation therapy (RT), or neither of these therapies. Propensity score adjusted Cox proportional hazard models and weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess survival. RESULTS: Compared to men who received no local treatment, PCSM was lower for men who received RP ± RT (HR 0.65, p < 0.01) and for those who received RT only (HR 0.79, p < 0.05). Patients receiving neither RP nor RT demonstrated higher PCSM and ACM than those receiving treatment in a weighted time-to-event analysis. Men who received RP + RT had longer mean time from diagnosis to initiation of chemotherapy (100.7 ± 47.7 months) than men with no local treatment (48.8 ± 35.0 months, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients who go on to receive chemotherapy, treatment of the primary tumor for prostate cancer appears to confer a survival advantage over those who do not receive primary treatment. These data suggest continued importance for local treatment of prostate cancer, even in patients at high risk of failing local therapy.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/métodos , Pontuação de Propensão , Próstata/patologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Programa de SEER , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Idoso , Causas de Morte/tendências , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Próstata/cirurgia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
J Urol ; 202(2): 324, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31042131
12.
J Aging Health ; 36(5-6): 379-389, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493607

RESUMO

ObjectivesAmong nursing home (NH) residents with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (AD/ADRD), racial/ethnic disparities in quality of care exist. However, little is known about quality of life (QoL). This study examines racial/ethnic differences in self-reported QoL among NH residents with AD/ADRD. Methods: Validated, in-person QoL surveys from 12,562 long-stay NH residents with AD/ADRD in Minnesota (2012-2015) were linked to Minimum Data Set assessments and facility characteristics. Hierarchical linear models assessed disparities in resident-reported mean QoL score (range, 0-100 points), adjusting for case-mix and facility factors. Results: Compared to White residents, racially/ethnically minoritized residents reported significantly lower total mean QoL scores (75.53 points vs. 80.34 points, p < .001). After adjustment for resident- and facility-level characteristics, significant racial/ethnic differences remained, with large disparities in food enjoyment, attention from staff, and engagement domains. Discussion: Policy changes and practice guidelines are needed to address racial/ethnic disparities in QoL of NH residents with AD/ADRD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Fatores Raciais , Casas de Saúde , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem
13.
Cancer ; 118(8): 2004-13, 2012 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21952948

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is associated with a significant reduction in ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and breast cancer mortality rates in patients with early stage breast cancer. The authors of this report sought to determine which patients with breast cancer do not receive RT after BCS in the United States. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was used to determine the rates of RT after BCS for women with stage I through III breast cancer in the United States from 1992 through 2007. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of omission of RT. RESULTS: In total, 294,254 patients with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer were identified who underwent surgery from 1992 through 2007. Most patients (57%) underwent BCS; among those, 21.1% did not receive RT after BCS. The omission of RT increased significantly from 1992 (15.5%) to 2007 (25%). The receipt of RT also decreased significantly for patients with increased cancer stage, age <55 years, high-grade tumors, large tumors, positive or untested lymph node status, African American or Hispanic race, and negative or unknown estrogen receptor status. Significant geographic variation was observed in the rates of RT after BCS. CONCLUSIONS: The omission of RT after BCS was more common in recent years, especially among women who had an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence. This trend represents a serious health care concern because of the potential increased risk of local recurrence and breast cancer mortality.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Radioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada/tendências , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/classificação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
14.
J Urol ; 187(4): 1253-8, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22335868

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We describe trends in the use of intensity modulated radiotherapy vs 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer and identified predictors of intensity modulated radiotherapy use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results)-Medicare database we identified 52,290 men with incident nonmetastatic prostate cancer from 2000 to 2007 who were treated with radiotherapy. We tracked trends in the use of intensity modulated radiotherapy, 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, brachytherapy and combinations. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were described and compared using chi-square and multivariate logistic regression. Trends at the place of service were also examined. RESULTS: Intensity modulated radiotherapy use increased from 1% of all radiotherapy in 2000 to 70% in 2007. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy use decreased from 75% to 12%. Most cases were treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy monotherapy. In 2007, 12% of the cohort received intensity modulated radiotherapy plus brachytherapy. In 2005, 81% of all external radiation was given as intensity modulated radiotherapy. Except for geography there were minimal differences in patient demographic and clinical characteristics between those treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs intensity modulated radiotherapy. On multivariate analysis significant predictors of the odds of receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy vs 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy were low Gleason score, high education, white or Asian race and urban place of residence. The odds of receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy varied greatly by registry. A lesser part of the growth in intensity modulated radiotherapy use occurred at freestanding facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Intensity modulated radiotherapy has replaced 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy as the primary form of external radiation for prostate cancer. The choice of intensity modulated radiotherapy over 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is not related to common clinical factors such as age, comorbidities or tumor aggressiveness. Although geographic variations exist, by 2007 intensity modulated radiotherapy dominated in all regions studied.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Radioterapia Conformacional
15.
J Urol ; 187(6): 2026-31, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22498210

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We examined the degree of exclusion bias that may occur due to missing data when grouping prostate cancer cases from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) database into D'Amico clinical risk groups. Exclusion bias may occur since D'Amico staging requires all 3 variables to be known and data may not be missing at random. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the SEER database we identified 132,606 men with incident prostate cancer from 2004 to 2006. We documented age, race, Gleason score, clinical T stage, PSA and geographic region. Men were categorized into D'Amico risk groups. Those with 1 or more unknown tumor variables (prostate specific antigen, T stage and/or Gleason score) were labeled unclassified. We compared the value of the other 2 known clinical variables for men with known vs unknown prostate specific antigen, Gleason score and T stage. Demographics were compared for those with and without missing data. Results were compared using chi-square and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the men 33% had 1 or more unknown tumor variables with T stage the most commonly missing variable. There was no clinically significant difference in the value of the other 2 known tumor variables when T stage or prostate specific antigen was missing. Men older than 75 years were more likely to have unknown variables than younger men. There was significant geographic variation in the frequency of unclassified D'Amico data. CONCLUSIONS: In studies in which the data set is limited to men who can be classified into a D'Amico risk group 33% of eligible patients are excluded from analysis. Such men are older and from certain SEER registries but they have tumor characteristics similar to those with complete data.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Programa de SEER , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Viés , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/classificação , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
16.
Cancer ; 117(19): 4557-65, 2011 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21412999

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is known to increase the risk of hip fractures in women, but the effect in men is unknown. METHODS: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, 45,662 men who were aged ≥66 years and diagnosed with prostate cancer in 1992-2004 were identified. By using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models, the primary outcome of hip fracture risk was compared among men who received radical prostatectomy (RP), EBRT, EBRT plus androgen suppression therapy (AST), or AST alone. Age, osteoporosis, race, and other comorbidities were statistically controlled. A secondary outcome was distal forearm fracture as an indicator of the risk of fall-related fracture outside the radiation field. RESULTS: After covariates were statistically controlled, the findings showed that EBRT increased the risk of hip fractures by 76% (hazards ratio [HR], 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-2.40) without increasing the risk of distal forearm fractures (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.14). Combination therapy with EBRT plus AST increased the risk of hip fracture 145% relative to RP alone (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.88-3.19) and by 40% relative to EBRT alone (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.17-1.68). EBRT plus AST increased the risk of distal forearm fracture by 43% relative to RP alone (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.97-2.10). The number needed to treat to result in 1 hip fracture during a 10-year period was 51 patients (95% CI, 31-103). CONCLUSIONS: In men with prostate cancer, pelvic 3-D conformal EBRT was associated with a 76% increased risk of hip fracture. This risk was slightly increased further by the addition of short-course AST to EBRT. This risk associated with EBRT must be site-specific as there was no increase in the risk of fall-related fractures in bones that were outside the radiation field.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril/etiologia , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Incidência , Masculino , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/cirurgia , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
J Surg Oncol ; 103(1): 39-45, 2011 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21031414

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Given the lack of population-based data in the literature, we sought to (1) identify predictors of appendiceal carcinoid tumor nodal metastasis to distinguish which patients would most likely benefit from hemicolectomy and (2) compare survival after hemicolectomy versus appendectomy alone. METHODS: Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database (1988-2005), we identified patients with appendiceal carcinoid tumors who underwent resection. We identified risk factors for nodal metastasis using logistic regression models and used the Kaplan-Meier method to compare adjusted overall and cancer-specific survival after right hemicolectomy versus appendectomy alone. RESULTS: 576 patients met our inclusion criteria. We found that tumor size (>2.0 cm) and tumor histology (pure carcinoid tumors) were significant predictors of lymph node metastasis. After stratifying by tumor size, we did not detect a significant difference in survival between patients who underwent hemicolectomy and those that underwent appendectomy alone (log-rank, P > 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size and histology are significant predictors of appendiceal carcinoid tumor nodal metastasis and therefore may be helpful to identify which patients would most likely benefit from a hemicolectomy. However, our population-based study did not demonstrate a significant difference in adjusted survival rates between hemicolectomy versus appendectomy alone.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Apêndice/patologia , Neoplasias do Apêndice/cirurgia , Tumor Carcinoide/secundário , Tumor Carcinoide/cirurgia , Colectomia/métodos , Idoso , Neoplasias do Apêndice/mortalidade , Tumor Carcinoide/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Am Surg ; 87(2): 287-295, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931304

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in health access and outcomes for many conditions is well known. However, for time-sensitive high-acuity diseases such as traumatic injuries, disparities in access and outcomes should be significantly diminished. Our primary objective was to characterize racial disparities across majority, mixed-race, and minority hospitals for African American ([AA] vs White) males with high-grade splenic injuries. METHODS: Data from the National Trauma Data Bank were utilized from 2007 to 2015; 24 855 AA or White males with high-grade splenic injuries were included. Multilevel mixed-effects regression analysis was used to evaluate disparities in outcomes and resource allocation. RESULTS: Mortality was significantly higher for AA males at mixed-race (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.1; P < .001) and minority (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-3.0; P < .001) hospitals, but not at majority hospitals. At minority hospitals, AA males were significantly less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (OR 0.7; 95% CI, 0.49-0.97; P = .04) and experienced a significantly longer time to surgery (IRR 1.5; P = .02). Minority hospitals were significantly more likely to have failures from angiographic embolization requiring operative intervention (OR 2.2, P = .009). At both types of nonmajority hospitals, AA males with penetrating injuries were more likely to be managed with angiography (mixed-race hospitals: OR 1.7; P = .046 vs minority hospitals: OR 1.6; P = .08). DISCUSSION: While multiple studies have shown that minority hospitals have increased mortality compared to majority hospitals, this study found this disparity only existed for AAs.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Baço/lesões , Escala Resumida de Ferimentos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Alocação de Recursos/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
Innov Aging ; 5(3): igab024, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34549094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prevalence of nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) has increased along with a growing consensus that person-centered ADRD care in nursing homes should maximize quality of life (QoL). However, concerns about whether residents with ADRD can make appropriate QoL judgments persist. This study assesses the stability and sensitivity of a self-reported, multidomain well-being QoL measure for nursing home residents with and without ADRD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study linked the 2012-2015 Minnesota Nursing Home Resident QoL and Satisfaction with Care Survey, Minimum Data Set 3.0 (nursing home assessments), and Minnesota Department of Human Services Cost Reports. The QoL survey included cohort-resident pairs who participated for 2 consecutive years (N = 12 949; 8 803 unique residents from 2012-2013, 2013-2014, and 2014-2015 cohorts). Change in QoL between 2 years was conceptualized as stable when within 1.5 SD of the sample average. We used linear probability models to estimate associations of ADRD/Cognitive Function Scale status with the stability of QoL summary and domain scores (eg, social engagement) and the absolute change in QoL summary score, controlling for resident and facility characteristics. RESULTS: Most (86.82%) residents had stable QoL summary scores. Residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, irrespective of ADRD, were less likely to have stable summary scores than cognitively capable residents without ADRD (p < .001), but associations varied by QoL domains. Among those with stable summary QoL scores, changes in health/functional status were associated with absolute changes in summary QoL score (p < .001), suggesting sensitivity of the QoL measure. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: QoL scores were similarly stable over time for most residents with and without ADRD diagnoses and were sensitive to changes in health/functional status. This self-reported QoL measure may be appropriate for nursing home residents, regardless of ADRD diagnosis, and can efficaciously be recommended to other states.

20.
Urology ; 145: 152-158, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763322

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the risk of genitourinary malignancies in the renal transplant patient. Currently, no consensus exists regarding screening and intervention, with much of the clinical decision-making based on historical practices established before recent progress in immunosuppression protocols and in genitourinary cancer diagnosis and management. METHODS: A database of all solid organ transplants performed at the University of Minnesota from 1984 to 2019 was queried for renal transplant recipients in whom development of subsequent urologic malignancies (prostate, bladder, renal, penile, and testicular cancer) was found. RESULTS: Among 6172 renal transplant recipients examined, cumulative incidence of all cancers of genitourinary etiology are presented over an average follow-up time of 10 years. Kidney cancer (combined graft and native), prostate cancer, and bladder cancer each demonstrated respective 30-year incidence of 4.6%, 8.7%, and 1.5% from the time of transplant. By comparison, age-matched data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database demonstrated 30-year cumulative incidence of 1.1%, 11.1%, and 1.7% for kidney cancer, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer respectively. The predominant genitourinary cancer was renal cell cancer, both of the native and of the transplanted kidney (native, n = 64; transplanted, n =11), followed by prostate cancer (n = 63), and bladder cancer (n = 37). CONCLUSION: In this closely followed cohort of renal transplant recipients, renal cancer occurs at a higher incidence rate than in the non-transplanted population, while a lower rate of prostate cancer was found, with bladder cancer demonstrating a comparable cumulative incidence between transplant patients and the national age-matched population.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Urogenitais/epidemiologia , Adulto , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA