A phase II trial of the Src kinase inhibitor saracatinib (AZD0530) in patients with metastatic or locally advanced gastric or gastro esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: a trial of the PMH phase II consortium.

PURPOSE: The Src family of kinases may play a role in the development and progression of gastric cancer. We evaluated the activity and safety of saracatinib an oral, anilinoquinazolone, non-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting Src kinases, in patients with metastatic or locally advanced gastric carcinoma. METHODS: Eligible patients who had received ≤1 prior line of chemotherapy for metastatic disease received saracatinib 175 mg/day of a 28 day cycle until progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response and/or prolonged stable disease rate (pSD ≥ 16 weeks). RESULTS: Ten patients with gastric carcinoma and 11 with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction received a median of 2 cycles (range 1-10 cycles) of treatment per patient. 17 patients were evaluable for response. No objective response was seen. One patient experienced prolonged Stable disease (pSD). Three patients had SD and 13 progressive disease. Median overall survival was 7.8 months (95% CI, 3.9-12.2 months) and median time to progression was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.5-1.9 months). Grade 3 events possibly related to saracatinib included: fatigue (2 patients), hypoxia (2) anemia (3) and lymphopenia (2). CONCLUSION: Saracatinib has insufficient activity as a single agent in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma to warrant further investigation. Further development in gastric cancer would require rational drug combinations or identification of a tumor phenotype sensitive to Src inhibition.

A Phase II trial of erlotinib as maintenance treatment after gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite the efficacy of gemcitabine-platinum regimen, the outcome of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM NPC) is poor. A phase II trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of erlotinib, given as maintenance therapy after gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy in patients with RM NPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m on days 1 and 8 as well as cisplatin 70 mg/m on day 1 (or carboplatin area under curve 5 on day 1, if contraindication to cisplatin) 3 weeks. After 6 chemotherapy cycles (or before in case of progression), patients were switched to erlotinib 150 mg/d 4 weeks. Primary end point was time to progression in patients without progressive disease after 6 chemotherapy cycles and treated with maintenance erlotinib. Epstein-Barr virus DNA plasma levels, measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, were correlated with outcome. RESULTS: Of 20 enrolled patients, 19 patients received 96 chemotherapy cycles. Fifteen patients were switched to erlotinib and received 36 cycles (range: 1 to 6 cycles). Safety profiles observed with the chemotherapy combination and erlotinib were those expected. Of 12 patients evaluable for response to erlotinib, all progressed except 3 patients (25%) who had stable disease for 3, 4, and 7 months, respectively. Median time to progression was 6.9 months for 13 patients without progressive disease after 6 chemotherapy cycles and treated with erlotinib. No correlation was identified between Epstein-Barr virus DNA plasma levels and clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance or second-line therapy with erlotinib after chemotherapy was not effective in RM NPC. Historical comparison with patients treated with the same chemotherapy alone until progression suggests that it may be detrimental to stop chemotherapy after 6 cycles if disease did not progress.