What Are the Effects of Irreversible Electroporation on a Staphylococcus aureus Rabbit Model of Osteomyelitis?

BACKGROUND: The treatment of osteomyelitis can be challenging because of poor antibiotic penetration into the infected bone and toxicities associated with prolonged antibiotic regimens to control infection. Irreversible electroporation (IRE), a percutaneous image-guided ablation technology in which the targeted delivery of high-voltage electrical pulses permanently damages the cell membrane, has been shown to effectively control bacterial growth in various settings. However, IRE for the management of bone infections has yet to be evaluated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We aimed to evaluate IRE for treating osteomyelitis by assessing (1) the efficacy of IRE to suppress the in vitro growth of a clinical isolate of S. aureus, alone or combined with cefazolin; and (2) the effects of IRE on the in vivo treatment of a rabbit model of osteomyelitis. METHODS: S. aureus strain UAMS-1 expanded in vitro to the log phase was subjected to an electric field of 2700 V/cm, which was delivered in increasing numbers of pulses. Immediately after electroporation, bacteria were plated on agar plates with or without cefazolin. The number of colony-forming units (CFUs) was scored the following day. ANOVA tests were used to analyze in vitro data. In a rabbit osteomyelitis model, we inoculated the same bacterial strain into the radius of adult male New Zealand White rabbits. Three weeks after inoculation, all animals (n = 32) underwent irrigation and débridement, as well as wound culture of the infected forelimb. Then, they were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups (n = eight per group): untreated control, cefazolin only, IRE only, or combined IRE + cefazolin. Serial radiography was performed to assess disease progression using a semiquantitative grading scale. Bone and soft-tissue specimens from the infected and contralateral forelimbs were collected at 4 weeks after treatment for bacterial isolation and histologic assessment using a semiquantitative scale. RESULTS: The in vitro growth of S. aureus UAMS-1 was impaired by IRE in a pulse-dependent fashion; the number of CFUs/mL was different among seven pulse levels, namely 0, 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 pulses. With the number of CFUs/mL observed in untreated controls set as 100%, 10 pulses rendered a median of 50.2% (range 47.1% to 58.2%), 30 pulses rendered a median of 2.7% (range 2.5% to 2.8%), 60 pulses rendered a median of 0.014% (range 0.012% to 0.015%), 90 pulses rendered a median of 0.004% (range 0.002% to 0.004%), 120 pulses rendered a median of 0.001% (range 0.001% to 0.001%), and 150 pulses rendered a median of 0.001% (range 0.000% to 0.001%) (Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.003). There was an interaction between the effect of the number of pulses and the concentration of cefazolin (two-way ANOVA: F [8, 30] = 17.24; p < 0.001), indicating that combining IRE with cefazolin is more effective than either treatment alone at suppressing the growth of S. aureus UAMS-1. Likewise, the clinical response in the rabbit model (the percentage of animals without detectable residual bacteria in the bone and surrounding soft tissue after treatment) was better in the combination group than in the other groups: control, 12.5% (one of eight animals); IRE only, 12.5% (one of eight animals); cefazolin only, 25% (two of eight animals); and IRE + cefazolin, 75% (six of eight animals) (two-sided Fisher's exact test: p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: IRE effectively suppressed the growth of S. aureus UAMS-1 and enhanced the antibacterial effect of cefazolin in in vitro studies. When translated to a rabbit osteomyelitis model, the addition of IRE to conventional parenteral antibiotic treatment produced the strongest response, which supports the in vitro findings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results show that IRE may improve the results of standard parenteral antibiotic treatment, thus setting the stage for models with larger animals and perhaps trials in humans for validation.

Bone marrow fibrosis in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes has prognostic value using current therapies and new risk stratification systems.

Bone marrow fibrosis has recently been recognized as an adverse histological feature in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes. In this study, we assessed the prognostic impact of bone marrow fibrosis in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes under the recently revised new risk stratification systems: the New Comprehensive Cytogenetic Scoring System and the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System. From 2002 to 2012, a total of 79 (13%) patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes and moderate/severe bone marrow fibrosis were identified; and these patients were compared with a control group of 166 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes but no significant fibrosis. Bone marrow fibrosis predicted an inferior overall survival and leukemia event-free survival for patients who received no hematopoietic stem cell transplant in univariate and multivariate analysis. Eleven patients with bone marrow fibrosis and 32 control group patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant; and bone marrow fibrosis was an independent risk for an inferior overall survival but not leukemia-free survival. In addition, 17 (4%) patients developed bone marrow fibrosis during the course of myelodysplastic syndromes, which was accompanied by clinical and cytogenetic evidence of disease progression. JAK2 V617F mutations were detected in 6 of the 28 patients with bone marrow fibrosis presenting at the time of diagnosis and 2 of the 7 patients with bone marrow fibrosis developing in the course of disease, significantly higher than the control group patients. We conclude that bone marrow fibrosis is an adverse risk feature in primary myelodysplastic syndromes in the current therapeutic era, and this risk feature is not captured by newly revised risk stratification systems. Inclusion of bone marrow fibrosis in patient assessment may further aid in risk-adapted therapeutic decisions.

B acute lymphoblastic leukemia with t(14;19)(q32;p13.1) involving IGH/EPOR: a clinically aggressive subset of disease.

B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with t(14;19)(q32;p13.1), in which IGH and EPOR are juxtaposed, has been reported rarely. We describe the clinicopathological features of six patients, three men and three women, with a median age of 39 years. Initial and follow-up bone marrow samples were examined from each patient. The clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic results were compared with data obtained from conventional cytogenetic analysis and by using home-brew fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes for IGH at 14q32 and EPOR at 19p13.1. The bone marrow specimens were hypercellular (median 90%; range 80-100%), with a median blast count of 90% (range 60-93%). Immunophenotypic analysis performed by flow cytometry demonstrated a stable, precursor B-cell immunophenotype. The t(14;19)(q32;p13.1) was present in all cases with morphologic evidence of disease. The translocation was stable and appeared morphologically subtle on conventional karyotypic analysis. Detection was facilitated using FISH, which confirmed IGH/EPOR rearrangement in all cases. All patients received aggressive multiagent chemotherapy as part of a variety of regimens. Four of six patients achieved an initial complete remission, but all relapsed. At last follow-up, five of six patients had died of disease (median survival, 12 months after diagnosis). We conclude that B-ALL associated with t(14;19)(q32;p13.1) is a distinctive form of disease that is associated with younger patient age and an aggressive clinical course.

The clinical importance of moderate/severe bone marrow fibrosis in patients with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes.

The presence of moderate to severe bone marrow (BM) fibrosis has been shown to be an adverse feature in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, the clinical importance of BM fibrosis is not clear in therapy-related MDS. We retrieved all therapy-related MDS (t-MDS) cases (n = 266) diagnosed at our hospital over a 10-year period (2003-2012). Reticulin and trichrome stains were performed in cases in which BM fibrosis was suspected on initial evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide. BM fibrosis was graded according to European consensus guidelines, and a score of MF2/MF3 was defined as moderate/severe fibrosis. Moderate/severe BM fibrosis was found in 47 (17%) patients. Compared to 219 patients with no/mild BM fibrosis, the patients with moderate/severe fibrosis presented with severer thrombocytopenia (p = 0.039) and higher numbers of circulating blasts (p = 0.051) but with similar degrees of anemia and neutropenia, transfusion requirements, and similar incidences of hepatosplenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Histological examination revealed a comparable BM cellularity and BM blast percentage, but markedly increased megakaryocytes (p < 0.001) in the fibrotic group. Although the risk distribution of cytogenetic data was similar according to the New Comprehensive Cytogenetic Scoring criteria, -5 and -17 were more frequently observed in t-MDS with moderate/severe BM fibrosis (p = 0.031 and p = 0.043, respectively). With a median follow-up of 11.5 months, patients with moderate/severe BM fibrosis showed a similar risk of acute myeloid leukemia transformation and a comparable overall survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. Moderate/severe BM fibrosis in patients with t-MDS is associated with certain clinicopathological and genetic features. However, unlike the situation in patients with primary MDS, moderate/severe BM fibrosis does not add additional risk to patients with therapy-related MDS.