Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr ; 17(3): 201-210, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37076326

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have shown that biomechanical variables, particularly endothelial shear stress (ESS), add synergistic prognostic insight when combined with anatomic high-risk plaque features. Non-invasive risk assessment of coronary plaques with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) would be helpful to enable broad population risk-screening. AIM: To compare the accuracy of ESS computation of local ESS metrics by CCTA vs IVUS imaging. METHODS: We analyzed 59 patients from a registry of patients who underwent both IVUS and CCTA for suspected CAD. CCTA images were acquired using either a 64- or 256-slice scanner. Lumen, vessel, and plaque areas were segmented from both IVUS and CCTA (59 arteries, 686 3-mm segments). Images were co-registered and used to generate a 3-D arterial reconstruction, and local ESS distribution was assessed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and reported in consecutive 3-mm segments. RESULTS: Anatomical plaque characteristics (vessel, lumen, plaque area and minimal luminal area [MLA] per artery) were correlated when measured with IVUS and CCTA: 12.7 â€‹± â€‹4.3 vs 10.7 â€‹± â€‹4.5 â€‹mm2, r â€‹= â€‹0.63; 6.8 â€‹± â€‹2.7 vs 5.6 â€‹± â€‹2.7 â€‹mm2, r â€‹= â€‹0.43; 5.9 â€‹± â€‹2.9 vs 5.1 â€‹± â€‹3.2 â€‹mm2, r â€‹= â€‹0.52; 4.5 â€‹± â€‹1.3 vs 4.1 â€‹± â€‹1.5 â€‹mm2, r â€‹= â€‹0.67 respectively. ESS metrics of local minimal, maximal, and average ESS were also moderately correlated when measured with IVUS and CCTA (2.0 â€‹± â€‹1.4 vs 2.5 â€‹± â€‹2.6 â€‹Pa, r â€‹= â€‹0.28; 3.3 â€‹± â€‹1.6 vs 4.2 â€‹± â€‹3.6 â€‹Pa, r â€‹= â€‹0.42; 2.6 â€‹± â€‹1.5 vs 3.3 â€‹± â€‹3.0 â€‹Pa, r â€‹= â€‹0.35, respectively). CCTA-based computation accurately identified the spatial localization of local ESS heterogeneity compared to IVUS, with Bland-Altman analyses indicating that the absolute ESS differences between the two CCTA methods were pathobiologically minor. CONCLUSION: Local ESS evaluation by CCTA is possible and similar to IVUS; and is useful for identifying local flow patterns that are relevant to plaque development, progression, and destabilization.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Placa Aterosclerótica , Humanos , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA