Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Hepatic Structures with Directly Converted Hepatocyte-Like Cells.

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology is a promising new technology in the field of bioartificial organ generation with regard to overcoming the limitations of organ supply. The cell source for bioprinting is very important. Here, we generated 3D hepatic scaffold with mouse-induced hepatocyte-like cells (miHeps), and investigated whether their function was improved after transplantation in vivo. To generate miHeps, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were transformed with pMX retroviruses individually expressing hepatic transcription factors Hnf4a and Foxa3. After 8-10 days, MEFs formed rapidly growing hepatocyte-like colonies. For 3D bioprinting, miHeps were mixed with a 3% alginate hydrogel and extruded by nozzle pressure. After 7 days, they were transplanted into the omentum of Jo2-treated NOD Scid gamma (NSG) mice as a liver damage model. Real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence analyses were conducted to evaluate hepatic function. The 3D bioprinted hepatic scaffold (25 × 25 mm) expressed Albumin, and ASGR1 and HNF4a expression gradually increased for 28 days in vitro. When transplanted in vivo, the cells in the hepatic scaffold grew more and exhibited higher Albumin expression than in vitro scaffold. Therefore, combining 3D bioprinting with direct conversion technology appears to be an effective option for liver therapy.

Generation of Multilayered 3D Structures of HepG2 Cells Using a Bio-printing Technique.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic liver disease is a major widespread cause of death, and whole liver transplantation is the only definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver diseases. However, many problems, including donor shortage, surgical complications and cost, hinder their usage. Recently, tissue-engineering technology provided a potential breakthrough for solving these problems. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been used to mimic tissues and organs suitable for transplantation, but applications for the liver have been rare. METHODS: A 3D bioprinting system was used to construct 3D printed hepatic structures using alginate. HepG2 cells were cultured on these 3D structures for 3 weeks and examined by fluorescence microscopy, histology and immunohistochemistry. The expression of liverspecific markers was quantified on days 1, 7, 14, and 21. RESULTS: The cells grew well on the alginate scaffold, and liver-specific gene expression increased. The cells grew more extensively in 3D culture than two-dimensional culture and exhibited better structural aspects of the liver, indicating that the 3D bioprinting method recapitulates the liver architecture. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D bioprinting of hepatic structures appears feasible. This technology may become a major tool and provide a bridge between basic science and the clinical challenges for regenerative medicine of the liver.