Preclinical Evaluation and a Pilot Clinical Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Study of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-FUSCC-II.

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a type II integral membrane serine protease, is a promising target for tumor diagnosis and therapy. OncoFAP has been recently discovered for PET imaging procedures for various solid malignancies. In this study, we presented the development of manual radiolabeling procedures for the preparation of OncoFAP-based radiopharmaceuticals for cancer imaging. A novel series of [68Ga/177Lu]Ga/Lu-FAPI-FUSCC-I/II were produced with high radiochemical yields. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-FUSCC-I/II and [177Lu]Lu-FAPI-FUSCC-I/II were stable in phosphate-buffered saline, fetal bovine serum, and human serum for at least 3 h. In vitro cellular uptake and blocking experiments implied that they had specificity to FAP. Additionally, the low nanomolar IC50 values of FAPI-FUSCC-II indicated that it had a high target affinity to FAP. The in vivo biodistribution and blocking study in mice bearing HT-1080-FAP tumors showed that both exhibited specific tumor uptake. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-FUSCC-II showed a higher tumor uptake and a higher tumor/nontarget ratio than [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-FUSCC-I and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04. The results of ex vivo biodistribution were in accordance with the biodistribution results. Clinical [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-FUSCC-II-PET/CT imaging further demonstrated its favorable biodistribution and kinetics with elevated and reliable uptake by primary tumors (maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), 12.17 ± 6.67) and distant metastases (SUVmax, 9.24 ± 4.28). In summary, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-FUSCC-II displayed increased tumor uptake and retention compared to [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, giving it potential as a promising tracer for the diagnostic imaging of malignant tumors with positive FAP expression.

Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of tonsil cancer and lymph node metastases: a single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging for primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with tonsil cancer. METHOD: Twenty-one tonsil cancer patients who underwent [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT scans within two weeks in our centre were retrospectively enrolled. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of the two tracers were compared by using the Mann‒Whitney U test. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two methods for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes were analysed. RESULTS: In detecting primary lesions, the efficiency was higher for [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (20/22) than for [18F]FDG PET/CT (9/22). Although [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 uptake (SUVmax, 5.03 ± 4.06) was lower than [18F]FDG uptake (SUVmax, 7.90 ± 4.84, P = 0.006), [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 improved the distinction between the primary tumor and contralateral normal tonsillar tissue. The TBR was significantly higher for [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (3.19 ± 2.06) than for [18F]FDG PET/CT (1.89 ± 1.80) (p < 0.001). In lymph node analysis, SUVmax and TBR were not significantly different between [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT (7.67 ± 5.88 vs. 8.36 ± 6.15, P = 0.498 and 5.56 ± 4.02 vs. 4.26 ± 3.16, P = 0.123, respectively). The specificity and accuracy of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were higher than those of [18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosing metastatic cervical lymph nodes (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The availability of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 complements the diagnostic results of [18F]FDG by improving the detection rate of primary lesions and the diagnostic accuracy of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in tonsil cancer compared to [18F]FDG.

ER status conversion and subsequent treatment: an assessment of negative ER expression detected by 18F-FES PET in metastatic breast cancer patients with ER-positive primary tumors.

Background: The 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FES PET/CT) technique provides a convenient method to evaluate the overall estrogen receptor (ER) expression in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. There are long debates on the characteristics and treatment strategy of patients with positive primary ER lesions but negative ER expression in metastatic disease. 18F-FES PET offers an opportunity to answer this question. Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the primary ER-positive patients with advanced-stage FES negativity and investigate the real-world treatment decisions made by physicians subsequently, and compare the efficacy between different regimens. Design: This observational cohort study was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, enrolling breast cancer patients with ER-positive primary tumors who showed advanced-stage FES negativity. Methods: Descriptive statistics were used in clinicopathologic characteristics and compared with a chi-square test or t-test. In addition, progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results: 16.6% (52/314) of patients with an ER-positive primary tumor had negative ER expression assessed by 18F-FES for MBC prior to receiving first-line systemic therapy, among whom adjuvant endocrine therapy was prevalently utilized (86.5%, 45/52). The rate of FES negativity in the advanced stage was negatively correlated with levels of ER expression of primary tumors. Chemotherapy (83.3%, 40/48) was the most common treatment strategy afterward, among which capecitabine monotherapy (62.5%, 25/40) was a dominant alternative. PFS was significantly prolonged with capecitabine alone versus other chemotherapy (median PFS: 13.14 versus 6.21 months, p = 0.029). Conclusion: Negative conversion of ER in MBC detected by 18F-FES occurred frequently. Patients with lower ER expression in the primary lesion were more likely to have negative ER expression in the metastasis. In real-world clinical practice, most physicians primarily opted for chemotherapy, with capecitabine monotherapy being a commonly selected regimen. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05797987.