Sepsis and Septic Shock in Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative sepsis represents a rare complication following thyroidectomy. We aimed to explore the incidence, risk factors, sources, and outcomes of postoperative sepsis and septic shock among adult patients undergoing thyroidectomy. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were used in this retrospective cohort study. Patients aged ≥18 y who underwent elective thyroidectomy between 2005 and 2019 were included. Multivariable binary logistic regression models were computed to explore risk factors and outcomes of 30-d sepsis and septic shock. RESULTS: Among the 180,373 included patients, 0.1% developed sepsis or septic shock. Male gender, low body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classes 3-5, functional dependence, smoking, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, inpatient surgery, malignant indication, clean-contaminated wound classification, and operation time ≥150 min were significant risk factors for development of sepsis or septic shock. Common infectious sources of sepsis included surgical site infections (29.6%), pneumonia (18.6%), urinary tract infections (16.2%), and multiple infections (6.9%). Patients with postoperative sepsis or septic shock were significantly more likely to develop complications, including wound disruption, stroke, cardiac and renal complications, thromboembolism, prolonged length of stay, unplanned reoperation, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis is rare following thyroidectomy. Our study provides insight into risk factors and procedural characteristics which may contribute to the development of postoperative sepsis or septic shock in this population.

Factors Affecting 30-Day Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nontraumatic Upper Extremity Amputation: A Retrospective Descriptive Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: Current literature concerning upper extremity amputations (UEAs) is very sparse. In this study, we conducted the first multicenter retrospective analysis aiming to identify risk factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients undergoing nontraumatic UEAs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult patients who underwent nontraumatic UEAs between 2005 and 2021 were divided into two cohorts based on whether they experienced 30-day major morbidity (MM). Thereafter, multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors of MM. RESULTS: From a total of 2984 cases, MM was observed in 8.7% of patients. Factors associated with MM included American Society of Anesthesiologists classes 3 (odds ratio [OR], 2.974 [1.862 to 4.748]) and 4 (OR, 4.736 [2.857 to 7.848]), being underweight (OR, 2.370 [1.251 to 4.491]), and suffering from insulin-dependent diabetes (OR, 1.390 [1.018 to 1.898]). In addition, an infectious surgical indication was associated with an increased risk of MM compared with having a benign (OR, 0.648 [0.488 to 0.682]) or malignant (OR, 0.205 [0.091 to 0.462]) indication. Moreover, patients undergoing shoulder amputations were at an increased risk of MM compared with those undergoing amputations of the forearm/wrist (OR, 0.243 [0.072 to 0.819]) and hands/fingers (OR, 0.286 [0.095 to 0.861]). CONCLUSION: The risk factors identified for MM after nontraumatic UEAs should guide surgeons toward appropriately identifying high-risk patients and adequately counseling them preoperatively.

Orthopaedic Surgery Complications at a Tertiary Care Hospital in a Low- and Middle-Income Country: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Through a comparison of orthopaedic surgical procedures performed at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan with other participating hospitals of National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), we aim to identify the areas of orthopaedic surgical care at our center that need improvement and also those which are at par with international standards. METHODS: The study analyses orthopaedic surgeries at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan using NSQIP registry to compare complication rates with other American College of Surgeons-NSQIP participant hospitals. Two reviewers collect data in different days every 8 days to reduce bias, and the results are reported in odds ratios using quarterly reports. This study included 584 eligible orthopaedic cases performed in 2021. Yearly institutional reports with odds ratios were also used to identify areas needing improvement and to implement changes to improve orthopaedic surgical outcomes at said institute. RESULTS: The quarterly reports suggest a relatively higher OR for certain indicators such as cardiac events, surgical site infection, mortality, and morbidity throughout. The renal failure rate was very high in the third and fourth quarters with odds ratios of 4.57 and 10.31, respectively. However, the official NSQIP annual institutional report for 2021 identified sepsis, surgical site infections, and cardiac complications as areas 'needing improvement'. It also indicated that the hospital performed exemplarily when it came to venous thromboembolism (VTE). As for the rest of the indicators, the hospital fell in the 'as expected' category of the NSQIP standards. CONCLUSION: This initial report helps the hospital's orthopaedic department in recognizing areas for improvement and making system-level changes to improve patient outcomes. The implementation of these interventions has yielded favorable outcomes, as evidenced by the findings in the NSQIP yearly report for 2022. Reinforcements and measures are needed to be taken to reduce the adverse events even further and to improve the patient outcomes and quality.