Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a complication of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). Previous research has identified predictive factors of POUR, such as age and history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). There is currently limited work on preventative measures. We hypothesize dexamethasone, a steroid, reduces POUR rates following LIHR due to its mechanism. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 979) undergoing LIHR from 2009 to 2017 at a single institution were selected from a prospectively managed database. All procedures were performed by four general surgeons. Only male patients were selected, as the majority of POUR occurs in males. Patients were retroactively chart reviewed and divided into two groups, dexamethasone use (n = 623) and no dexamethasone use (n = 356). Perioperative factors were compared between groups with Chi-square and independent samples t tests. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether dexamethasone use was associated with POUR. A subgroup analysis was performed on the dexamethasone group to determine any dose-dependent effects. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in POUR between the dexamethasone group and no dexamethasone group (3.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.0001). Patients in the dexamethasone group had a shorter length of stay, and were less likely to have BPH or a Foley placed (all p < 0.05). Age and BMI were similar between groups. Multivariable analysis showed that the use of dexamethasone was associated with a reduced risk of POUR (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.2-0.97, p = 0.0386), while controlling for factors such as age and BPH. A subgroup analysis examined the effect of dexamethasone per unit (mg) increase. There was no significant association between dexamethasone dose and POUR rates (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82-1.38, p = 0.6241). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received dexamethasone showed a lower rate of POUR regardless of dose. These results suggest dexamethasone can be administered to reduce POUR in males undergoing LIHR.

Assessing residents in surgical ethics: we do it a lot; we only know a little.

BACKGROUND: PGY-1 year of surgical residency brings together many persons of disparate experiences and educational backgrounds, including their exposure to ethics. We hypothesized that surgical PGY-1s would have a similar exposure to ethical scenarios but lack the confidence in practice and understanding of ethical principles compared with more senior residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical residents were invited to resident-initiated surgical ethics workshops utilizing a standardized text. Here a survey and multiple choice tests were administered to participants. The survey determined prior exposure to ethics curricula, the frequency of exposure to various ethics topics, and their comfort with these scenarios. A multiple choice test then quantified the knowledge base of participating residents. The results were collected and compared between surgical PGY-1s and more senior residents. RESULTS: Eighteen PGY-1s and 12 senior residents completed this curriculum. Resident exposure to ethical concepts was common. Resident confidence in these topics was ranked moderate or higher for both groups. Despite frequent clinical exposure and strong confidence in their skills of addressing these topics, performance on the test was poor, with an average score of 59% for PGY-1s and 47% for more senior residents (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical exposure to and confidence in their management of ethical topics, their knowledge base was poor and worse for more senior residents. Given the overall interest in a formal ethics curriculum and the knowledge deficit demonstrated, educational intervention and professional ethics support should be provided for surgical residents even with the current educational time constraints.

Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers to Referral.

BACKGROUND: Each year from 2011 to 2017, fewer than 1% of eligible Americans underwent bariatric surgery to treat obesity and obesity-related comorbidities. Recent studies have suggested that a lack of knowledge within the primary care specialty about the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery greatly affects referral. This study aimed to analyze a large cohort of primary care physicians' (PCPs) clinical perceptions regarding bariatric surgery and to identify major barriers to referral that could inform the implementation of a future educational strategy to address underutilization of bariatric surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective anonymous electronic survey was sent to all primary care physicians at a multicenter community-based academic hospital system between March and June of 2018, with 150 respondents, a response rate of 28%. The survey was composed of eleven questions in total, the first eight utilizing a five-point Likert scale, with answers including strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree. The final three questions utilized freeform answers of numbers or text where appropriate. RESULTS: Between 83 and 88% of PCPs responded favorably, either agree or strongly agree, to questions regarding the utility of bariatric surgery as an efficacious and valuable tool for the treatment of obesity and related comorbidities. PCPs reported an average body mass index (BMI) of 40.4 ± 5.0 kg/m2 at which bariatric surgery is a patient's best option for weight loss and an average BMI of 38.0 ± 5.6 kg/m2 at which surgery is the best option for management of comorbidities. Eighty-six percent of PCPs agree that having a BMI over 40 kg/m2 is a greater risk to a patient's long-term health than undergoing bariatric surgery. However, only 46.6% of PCPs claimed any familiarity with the NIH eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery and only 59.5% responded affirmatively that they were comfortable participating in the long-term care of a postoperative bariatric patient. The two highest reported barriers to referral for bariatric surgery together account for 40% of PCPs responses: 21.5% of PCPs report concern regarding surgical complications and/or long-term side effects as the primary barrier for referral, and 18.5% report concern for ineffective weight loss after bariatric surgery as a primary barrier to referral. CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicate that despite largely positive attitudes toward the use of bariatric surgery in a patient population with obesity, primary care physicians report significant barriers to confidently referring their own patients. Further, bariatric surgery is overlooked in a large group of patients with BMIs between 35 and 40 kg/m2. Educational strategies to address these barriers should target rates of specific surgical complications and weight loss outcomes.

A 1-day simulation-based boot camp for incoming general surgery residents improves confidence and technical skills.

BACKGROUND: For surgery residents, opportunities to systematically learn about surgical equipment are limited. Our facility holds a simulation-based boot camp for incoming, first-year general surgery residents. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of this boot camp at increasing resident confidence and improving technical skills. METHODS: Boot camp for incoming surgery residents is held annually and provides hands-on simulation relating to endoscopy, laparoscopy, bronchoscopy, and abdominal access. Before the boot camp, participants completed a pretest, which includes self-confidence, experience, and a skills-assessment. Identical assessments of self-confidence and skills were completed after the boot camp as a posttest. Data was accrued from 2016 to 2018. RESULTS: A total of 26, first-year, general surgery residents participated in the boot camp. Most participants had never used an endoscopic simulator (61.5%), handled a colonoscope (57.7%), a gastroscope (80.8%), or gained operative access to the abdomen (76.9%). The assessments of self-confidence and skills demonstrated a mean increase in all 4 topics. All differentials demonstrated statistical significance (P <. 001). CONCLUSION: A 1-day, simulation-based boot camp for incoming surgery residents with a focus on endoscopy, laparoscopy, and abdominal access increases resident confidence as well as several basic aspects of technical skill.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy: Evaluating safety, efficacy, and efficiency.

BACKGROUND: For many surgeons, a prior prostatectomy is considered a contraindication to laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of totally extraperitoneal in these patients. METHODS: This is a review of a prospectively collected hernia database evaluating patients who underwent totally extraperitoneal repair between October 2009 and March 2018. Patients with prior prostatectomy were matched to controls without prior prostatectomy. Secondary analysis compared the case group to patients who underwent open hernia repair. RESULTS: In the study, 1,751 patients underwent laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair. Thirty patients with a prior prostatectomy were matched to 90 controls. Operative duration was greater in the prostatectomy group (56 vs 36 minutes, P < .0001) and more peritoneal tears occurred (40% vs 12%, P = .002). Duration of stay, return to activity, complications, and rates of recurrence and chronic pain were equivalent. When compared with prior prostatectomy patients who underwent open hernia repair, the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal group had equivalent rates of complications and outcomes with a faster return to activities of daily living (3 vs 7 days P = .007). CONCLUSION: Despite a more difficult dissection, laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair in patients with prior prostatectomy is safe, efficacious, and efficient. In addition, totally extraperitoneal offers similar outcomes to open repair with a quicker recovery in this patient population.

Patient-Centered Outcomes after Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate patient-centered quality of life (QOL) outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively followed patients who underwent laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair between 2009 and 2016. The QOL outcomes were measured using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, GERD Health Related Quality of Life, Reflux Symptom Index, and Dysphagia score surveys administered preoperatively and at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Postoperative QOL outcomes were compared with preoperative baseline scores using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Of 314 total patients who underwent laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, 188 with adequate follow-up were included in analysis. Mean age was 69.1 ± 11.8 years and 22.3% of studied subjects were male. Most of the cohort also underwent laparoscopic fundoplication (95.7%). Prevalent symptoms at initial presentation include heartburn (65.4%) and regurgitation (60.1%). Significant improvements between baseline and all postoperative time points were seen in Reflux Symptoms Index (3 weeks: p < 0.0001, 6 months: p = 0.005, 1 year: p = 0.0004, and 2 years: p = 0.002) and GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores (3 weeks: p < 0.0001, 6 months: p = 0.0019, 1 year: p < 0.0001, and 2 years: p = 0.0003). Dysphagia scores were worse at 3 weeks but lost significance at all other time points. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey measures of Energy/Fatigue (p = 0.0099), Emotional Well-Being (p = 0.0393), Social Functioning (p = 0.0278), Pain (p = 0.0021), and Role Limitations Due to Physical Health (p = 0.0009) were significantly improved 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair results in significantly improved QOL as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey at both short- and long-term intervals. Additionally, Reflux Symptom Index and GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores improved at all postoperative time points.

Efficacy of a Required Preoperative Weight Loss Program for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

The efficacy of mandatory medically supervised preoperative weight loss (MPWL) prior to bariatric surgery continues to be a controversial topic. The purpose of this observational study was to assess the efficacy of a MPWL program in a single institution, which mandated at least 10% excess body weight loss before surgery, by comparing outcomes of patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery with and without a compulsory preoperative weight loss regimen. We analyzed our database of 757 patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery between March 2008 and January 2015. Patients were placed into two cohorts based on their participation in a MPWL program requiring at least 10% excess weight loss (EWL) prior to surgery. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery for weight loss, comorbidity resolution, and the occurrences of hospital readmissions. A total of 717 patients met the inclusion criteria of whom 465 underwent surgery without a preoperative weight loss requirement and 252 participated in the MPWL program. One year after surgery, 67.1% of non-participants and 62.5% of MPWL participants showed a resolution of at least one of five associated comorbidities (p = 0.45). Non-participants showed an average of 58.6% EWL, while MPWL participants showed 59.1% EWL at 1 year postoperatively (p = 0.84). Readmission rates, excluding those which were ulcer-related, at 30 days (3.4 vs. 6.40%, p = 0.11) and 90 days (9.9 vs. 7.5%, p = 0.29) postoperatively were not significantly different between the non-participants and MPWL patients, respectively. A mandatory preoperative weight loss program prior to bariatric surgery did not result in significantly greater %EWL or comorbidity resolution 1 year after surgery compared to patients not required to lose weight preoperatively. Additionally, the program did not result in significantly lower 30- or 90-day readmission rates for these patients. The value of a MPWL program must be weighed against the potential loss of bariatric surgery candidates. Patients who fail to lose 10% excess weight preoperatively are thus ineligible for a procedure from which they would otherwise benefit. Our data suggest these patients will have similar positive outcomes.

Exacerbation of acute pancreatitis by combined cholinergic stimulation and duct obstruction.

BACKGROUND: The role of cholinergic pathways in the pathogenesis of bile-pancreatic duct ligation (BPDL)-induced acute pancreatitis in rats remains controversial. We hypothesized that cholinergic stimulation exacerbates acute pancreatic inflammation in the presence of duct obstruction. METHODS: We studied 34 rats divided into 5 groups as follows: (1) sham operation; (2) BPDL; (3) BPDL with duodenal bile-pancreatic juice (BPJ) replacement fresh from a donor rat; (4) BPDL with BPJ replacement as in 3 above, and carbachol (CCh) 5 ug/h subcutaneously; or (5) CCh 5 ug/h subcutaneously only. Rats were killed after 6 hours. RESULTS: The P value was less than .05 by analysis of variance. Pancreatic morphologic changes and zymogen fraction hyperamylasemia seen with duct ligation (2 vs. 1) were ameliorated significantly by duodenal BPJ replacement (3 vs. 2), but not when exogenous CCh was administered (4 vs. 3), whereas CCh alone showed no significant changes compared with sham (5 vs. 1). CONCLUSIONS: Cholinergic stimulation and duct obstruction synergistically amplify acinar hyperstimulation and exacerbate acute pancreatitis.

Management of adverse surgical events: a structured education module for residents.

BACKGROUND: This pilot project involved the development of a structured, experiential, educational module using a bench model technical skills simulation and standardized patients. It integrated teaching and assessment of clinical, technical, and interpersonal skills, as well as professionalism within the context of an adverse surgical event. METHODS: General surgery residents (postgraduate year [PGY] 2, 3) were asked to participate in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative management of a patient with a retroperitoneal sarcoma. Residents' performances during the module were assessed by standardized patients and faculty, and residents were provided feedback during debriefing sessions. RESULTS: Resident performance during the module was appropriate for the level of training. Residents found this module to be a realistic, challenging, and beneficial learning experience. CONCLUSIONS: Novel educational modules such as this one may serve as a useful addition to resident education in surgery residency programs, particularly in addressing patient safety and the core competencies. Reliability of the model may be enhanced by modifications of the module.

Preoperative evaluation: pulmonary, cardiac, renal dysfunction and comorbidities.

This article reviews evidence supporting the exercise of risk assessment and demonstrates how it assists in determining which patients should undergo a planned invasive procedure. The article focuses on the preoperative functional assessment of three major organ systems--cardiac, pulmonary, and renal--and reviews guide-lines for determining which patients need additional testing of organ system function. The article also discusses how to improve the condition of selected patients so that the surgeon can achieve the best possible result and outcome.

Primary cancers of the small bowel: analysis of prognostic factors and results of surgical management.

HYPOTHESIS: This study was done to review the clinical presentation, surgical management, pathologic features, and prognostic factors for primary small-bowel cancers. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary care, university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients were surgically treated between January 1, 1977, and December 31, 2000. There were 73 men and 56 women, with a median age of 55 years (age range, 19-82 years). Median follow-up was 36 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presenting symptoms and signs, operations performed, and surgical pathologic features were analyzed and survival curves were generated. RESULTS: Clinical findings included abdominal pain (63%), vomiting (48%), weight loss (44%), and gastrointestinal tract bleeding (23%). The distribution of tumors by histological features was as follows: adenocarcinoma (33%), carcinoid tumor (29%), lymphoma (19%), and sarcoma (19%). Cumulative 5-year survival rate was 37% in the adenocarcinoma group, 64% in the carcinoid tumor group, 29% in the lymphoma group, and 22% in the sarcoma group. Significant prognostic predictors of overall survival for the entire cohort and for each tumor subtype included complete resection and American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor stage (P<.05). Patient age, tumor location, histological grade, and use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy did not significantly influence survival. Curative resections were accomplished in 83 patients (64%) with a median survival of 37 months compared with 46 patients undergoing incomplete or palliative resections with a median survival of 10 months (P<.05). Adjacent organ resection was required in 18 (22%) of the 83 patients undergoing potentially curative resections. The median time to recurrence was 16 months. Twenty-one patients (16%) developed associated primary cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive surgical resection in an attempt to achieve complete tumor removal seems warranted. Despite complete resections, patients with high-stage tumors remain at risk for recurrence.

Achalasia treatment: improved outcome of laparoscopic myotomy with operative manometry.

HYPOTHESIS: Operative manometry detects residual esophagogastric junction (EGJ) high pressure, ensuring complete myotomy. DESIGN: Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic myotomy. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: From 1997 to 2003, 139 patients with achalasia underwent laparoscopic myotomy. INTERVENTIONS: We assessed myotomy completeness by operative endoscopy and performed operative manometry to measure pressure across the EGJ myotomy. Residual high pressure was isolated and intact muscle divided. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Esophageal manometry, quality of life, and dysphagia severity score. RESULTS: Median lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 27 mm Hg preoperatively; 10 patients had sigmoid esophagus and 57 had previous dilation and/or toxin injection. There were 136 laparoscopic myotomies and 3 conversions to open procedures (2%). Operative endoscopy was performed in all patients. Operative manometry, completed in 132 patients (95%), identified residual EGJ high pressure leading to myotomy revision in 45 patients (31 in the first 70 treated). Small perforations occurred in 19 patients, associated with previous dilation and/or toxin injection in 12 patients. One-month follow-up was available in 136 patients (98%); 126 patients had minimal symptoms (93%), whereas 1 had recurrent EGJ high pressure, 5 esophagitis, 3 sigmoid esophagus, and 1 paraesophageal hernia. In 60 patients with complete 1-year follow-up, quality of life and dysphagia improved (P <.05); mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure decreased to 7.6 mm Hg (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Operative manometry identifies residual EGJ high pressure and reduces the incidence of incomplete myotomy. Laparoscopic myotomy improves quality of life and dysphagia symptoms and may be the treatment of choice in most patients with achalasia.

One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is becoming a promising alternative with many potential advantages, but this procedure is still under study. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach to ventral hernia repair. METHODS: One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs between April 2000 and February 2003 were prospectively entered into a database and reviewed. RESULTS: Ninety-seven ventral hernia repairs were completed laparoscopically. The mean time in the operating room was 128 minutes (range 37 to 255). The average length of stay was 2 days (range 0 to 9). The mortality rate was 0%. A total of 23% of patients experienced postoperative complications. Over a mean follow-up period of 3 months (range 0 to 26), 6% (6 of 97) of patients experienced recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair can be safely performed with a low conversion rate and acceptable recurrence rate, operative time, length of stay, and morbidity. Securing the mesh with full-thickness abdominal wall sutures in at least 4 quadrants remains a key factor in preventing early recurrence.

Housestaff performance is improved by participation in a laparoscopic skills curriculum.

BACKGROUND: After the implementation of a laparoscopic skills curriculum, we studied two questions: (1) can skills curriculum participation improve performance and (2) can we identify housestaff who may benefit from early instruction in laparoscopic technical skills? METHODS: We administered a six-task laparoscopic skills curriculum to postgraduate year (PGY) 2 and PGY3 surgical housestaff. Six laparoscopic tasks were divided into two groups: generalized skills and task specific skills. All participants were evaluated during a pretest and were placed in the novice group (total score less than 600) or in the intermediate skill (IS) group (total score 600 or more). Each participant had two 1-hour practice/instruction sessions and 2 weeks for independent practice. After these sessions, a posttest was administered. RESULTS: Novices and intermediate skill participants demonstrated significant improvement in general skills and task specific skills. However, comparison of novice and IS group learners revealed that IS group learners were significantly more proficient in the performance of general skills, but the performance of task specific skills failed to demonstrate a difference between the two groups. On posttest, there was no significant difference in overall score between novices and IS participants. CONCLUSIONS: Overall ability and performance of generalized skills by all housestaff are improved with a laparoscopic skills curriculum; however, the performance of novices improved the greatest. Task specific skills did not discriminate novices from more advanced learners. Early testing of housestaff may identify those individuals who could benefit from intervention and instruction prior to performing the laparoscopic skills in the operating room.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in lung transplant patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in lung transplant patients is being increasingly investigated because of its reported association with chronic rejection. However, information concerning the characteristics of GERD in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is scarce. METHODS: We compared esophageal pH monitoring, manometry, gastric emptying studies, and barium swallow of 10 lung transplant patients with CF with those of 78 lung transplant patients with other end-stage pulmonary diseases. RESULTS: In lung transplant patients with CF, the prevalence of GERD was 90% (vs 54% controls, P = .04), of whom 70% had proximal reflux (vs 29% controls, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplant patients with CF have a significantly higher prevalence and proximal extent of GERD than do other lung transplant recipients. These data suggest that CF patients in particular should be routinely screened for GERD after transplantation to identify those who may benefit from antireflux surgery, especially given the risks of GERD-related aspiration and chronic allograft injury.

The prevalence and extent of gastroesophageal reflux disease correlates to the type of lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is increasingly convincing that lung transplantation is a risk factor of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, it is still not known if the type of lung transplant (unilateral, bilateral, or retransplant) plays a role in the pathogenesis of GERD. STUDY DESIGN: The records of 61 lung transplant patients who underwent esophageal function tests between September 2008 and May 2010, were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were divided into 3 groups based on the type of lung transplant they received: unilateral (n=25); bilateral (n=30), and retransplant (n=6). Among these groups we compared: (1) the demographic characteristics (eg, sex, age, race, and body mass index); (2) the presence of Barrett esophagus, delayed gastric emptying, and hiatal hernia; and (3) the esophageal manometric and pH-metric profile. RESULTS: Distal and proximal reflux were more prevalent in patients with bilateral transplant or retransplant and less prevalent in patients after unilateral transplant, regardless of the cause of their lung disease. The prevalence of hiatal hernia, Barrett esophagus, and the manometric profile were similar in all groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although our data show a discrepancy in prevalence of GERD in patients with different types of lung transplantation, we cannot determine the exact cause for these findings from this study. We speculate that the extent of dissection during the transplant places the patients at risk for GERD. On the basis of the results of this study, a higher level of suspicion of GERD should be held in patients after bilateral or retransplantation.

Comparison of resident self-assessments with trained faculty and standardized patient assessments of clinical and technical skills in a structured educational module.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the reliability of surgical resident self-assessment in comparison with faculty and standardized patient (SP) assessments during a structured educational module focused on perioperative management of a simulated adverse event. METHODS: Seven general surgery residents participated in this module. Residents were assessed during videotaped preoperative and postoperative SP encounters and when dissecting a tumor off of a standardized inanimate vena cava model in a simulated operating room. RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative assessments by SPs correlated significantly (P < .05) with faculty assessments (r = .75 and r = .79, respectively), but not resident self-assessments. Coefficient alpha was greater than .70 for all assessments except resident preoperative self-assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty and SP assessments can provide reliable data useful for formative feedback. Although resident self-assessment may be useful for the formative assessment of technical skills, results suggest that in the absence of training, residents are not reliable self-assessors of preoperative and postoperative interactions with SPs.

Causes of high mortality in colorectal surgery: a review of episodes of care in Veterans Affairs hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The episode of care for colorectal surgery in 8 outlier Veterans Affairs Hospitals with high mortality and the volume outcome relationship in 118 Hospitals are examined. METHODS: A total of 103 deaths were reviewed. Mean age was 74 with 63% of the patients undergoing emergency surgery; 54% of the patients had malignant disease and 21% had metastatic disease. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of the patients had a delay in diagnosis, 22% had delay in surgery and 14% should have received a different surgery usually less radical. In addition, system related issues were identified in 19% of the cases and practitioner related issues in 20% of the cases. The Spearman rank correlation between colorectal surgery volume and unadjusted mortality was 0.114 (P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgery death is prevalent in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery for malignancy or metastatic disease and is not related to hospital volume. Timely diagnosis, less radical surgery while optimizing system based pathways might improve outcome.