Contribution to the biophysics of the lethal effects of electric field on microorganisms.

The proposed model assumes that the criteria leading to the lethal breakdown of microorganisms suspended in a continuous medium depend on two parameters: (a) the applied electric field must exceed the critical field of membrane to create holes and (b) the Joule energy (deposited in the membrane) must exceed the minimum value beyond which the cell can not recover. The first parameter initiates (reversible) breakdown and the second one, the completion of the (irreversible) electrical breakdown leading to death of the cell. The number of cells surviving the electric field treatment is related to statistical distribution of cell size. Comparison between theory and the experimental results of Kinosita and Tsong (1977); Hülsheger et al. (1980, 1981, 1983); Rosemberg and Korenstein (1990) and others is given.

Dietary supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids prolongs platelet survival in hyperlipidemic patients with atherosclerosis.

Enhanced dietary omega-3 fatty acid consumption is thought to be associated with a reduced incidence of atherothrombotic disorders. This effect may be mediated in part through suppression of in vivo platelet activity by omega-3 fatty acids. We observed that platelet survival, a sensitive indicator of in vivo platelet activity was prolonged from 6.4 +/- 1.5 days to 7.7 +/- 1.4 days by moderate amounts of dietary omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for 6 weeks in a group of hyperlipidemic patients with preexisting, established atherothrombotic disorders. This effect on platelet survival was associated with a decrease in platelet arachidonic acid levels from 26.7 +/- 3.5% to 20.9% +/- 2.5% and a rise in platelet eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acid measurements from essentially undetectable to 2.8% +/- 1.6% and 1.9% +/- 1.0%. Plasma total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and serum apolipoprotein B levels rose significantly during the omega-3 fatty acid supplementation period. Platelet aggregation did not change. This study demonstrates that a modest amount of dietary omega-3 fatty acid supplementation can significantly effect in vivo platelet activity in a population at high risk for recurrent atherothrombotic disorders.

Dilevalol in severe hypertension. A multicenter trial of bolus intravenous dosing.

Dilevalol, the R-R optical isomer of labetalol, a nonselective beta-antagonist with vasodilation from selective beta 2 agonism, was administered in sequential multiple bolus intravenous injections of 10 to 100 mg in total doses ranging from 35 to 585 mg (mean dose, 414 mg) to 101 patients with supine diastolic blood pressures above 120 mm Hg. Mean blood pressure was reduced from 200 (+/- 3)/129 (+/- 1) mm Hg to 149 (+/- 2)/101 (+/- 1) mm Hg, a mean reduction of 51/28 mm Hg. The therapeutic goal was established as a reduction in supine diastolic blood pressure to less than 100 mm Hg or a reduction of at least 30 mm Hg. This was achieved in 62 (61%) of 101 patients, with an additional 7 patients having a final supine diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg. Treatment with dilevalol was less successful in black male patients than in the group at large. There was a tendency for older patients to respond better than younger patients. Prior recent treatment of patients with beta-adrenergic antagonists decreased the effectiveness of the drug. Significant orthostatic hypotension was not noted. Sixty-four patients were transferred to oral dilevalol treatment in combination with a diuretic, and blood pressure in this group averaged 160/100 mm Hg after 1 month of therapy. Dilevalol appears to be a safe and effective drug that can be used intravenously successfully in the majority of patients with severe hypertension and provides an alternative to therapy with other agents. It also is a useful agent for oral treatment of these patients after successful intravenous therapy.

Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of the calcium channel blocking agent nitrendipine.

In an open crossover comparison of propranolol and nitrendipine, 19 patients with hypertension received 40 to 160 mg propranolol and 5 to 20 mg nitrendipine twice a day. Mean (+/- SD) predose supine blood pressure fell from 145/98 +/- 11/7 to 132/88 +/- 12/8 mm Hg with propranolol and to 135/92 +/- 11/9 mm Hg with nitrendipine. Resting heart rate was reduced by propranolol but was unchanged 12 hours after nitrendipine dosing. Neither propranolol nor nitrendipine altered plasma glucose or insulin after oral glucose. Propranolol significantly increased fasting triglyceride levels and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, but nitrendipine induced no change. Propranolol reduced and nitrendipine increased plasma renin activity after exercise. Peak plasma nitrendipine levels were dose proportional and occurred at 1 to 2 hours after dosing, whereas peak blood pressure reductions occurred 4 hours after the last dose of nitrendipine and were associated with mean increases in heart rate. Nitrendipine is almost equivalent in hypotensive effect to propranolol, but nitrendipine increases plasma renin activity after exertion and may produce transient tachycardia. However, nitrendipine does not cause unwanted metabolic effects.

Effect of a standard breakfast on digoxin absorption in normal subjects.

The influence of food on absorption of digoxin was studied in 6 healthy volunteers who received 1.0 mg digoxin as 4 tablets of Lanoxin either after an overnight fast, immediately after a standard breakfast, or 90 min after a standard breakfast. There was no significant difference between the three regimens in terms of area under the plasma concentration-time curve for 79 hr or in the 10-day cumulative urinary excretion. The mean peak plasma concentration was higher (p less than 0.05) when digoxin was given fasting (4.2 +/- 0.46 ng/ml) than immediately after food (2.8 +/- 0.24 ng/ml). The mean peak plasma concentration when digoxin was administered 90 min after food (3.3 +/- 0.30 ng/ml) was intermediate but not significantly different from either of the other mean peak concentrations. The results demonstrate that ingestion of food decreases rate but not extent of absorption of concurrently administered digoxin.

Theophylline serum protein binding in obstructive airways disease.

The percentage of theophylline bound to protein in sera obtained from patients with obstructive airways disease was determined by ultrafiltration. The bound theophylline fraction in 71 serum specimens collected from 51 patients was 60.7 +/- 10.0% (mean +/- SD) and from 30.8% to 83.2%. The correlation between unbound serum theophylline concentration and total concentration (range 0.8 to 90 mg/l) was linear (r = 0.97, p less than 0.001). Theophylline binding correlated poorly with serum albumin (r = 0.39) and total serum protein (r = 0.35), although the correlations were statistically significant (p less than 0.05), Theophylline binding in women did not differ from that in men. The extent of theophylline binding in younger patients was greater than in patients over 55 yr (64.3 +/- 8.5% and 57.0 +/- 10.4%, p less than 0.005). Variation in theophylline binding in 12 patients from whom two or more serum samples were collected was relatively small. Analysis of variance showed interpatient variation in theophylline binding (p less than 0.01) but not between sampling occasions in the same patient. The demonstrated variability in serum protein binding of theophylline should influence theophylline distribution and elimination kinetics and may be another determinant of clinical response. Patients with lower binding levels should have higher plasma levels of unbound drug after a loading dose and will need more frequent dosing.

The comparative effects of verapamil and a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker on digoxin pharmacokinetics.

Conflicting conclusions have been reported about interaction of calcium channel blockers with digoxin. The effects of verapamil (240 mg/day) and a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, isradipine (15 mg/day), on the pharmacokinetics of 1 mg intravenous digoxin were compared. All 24 volunteer subjects were healthy, male, nonobese, and aged 18 to 38 years. Groups of 12 subjects received each oral agent over 15 days, with collections of blood and urine for 72 hours after intravenous digoxin. Significant (P less than 0.05) reduction in nonrenal (7.01 +/- 1.97 to 4.00 +/- 1.86 L/hr) and total clearance (14.1 +/- 2.6 to 11.5 +/- 2.5 L/hr) were induced by verapamil, without change in renal clearance. A near-significant (P less than 0.1) increase in peripheral volume of distribution contributed to prolonged elimination half-life (23.1 +/- 4.4 to 34.3 +/- 9.7 hours). By contrast, isradipine caused only a 9% reduction in volume of distribution. Verapamil causes digoxin accumulation by reducing nonrenal elimination. No evidence of clinically relevant interaction of isradipine with digoxin was seen.

Variability of steady-state digoxin kinetics during administration of tablets or capsules.

An encapsulated solution of digoxin has been repeatedly shown to have greater bioavailability than tablet forms of the drug. It is predicted that such a preparation would show reduced within- and between-patient variability in absorption, as most studies in normal subjects have shown reduced intersubject variation with the capsule. We tested inter- and intrapatient variability during 4-week periods of dosing with digoxin capsules and tablets in 28 subjects with cardiac disease. In the overall group there were no significant differences between the formulations at steady state in between-patient variability in trough serum digoxin concentrations or 24-hour urinary digoxin excretion. Within-patient variability in urinary digoxin excretion was somewhat lower for the capsules. In a subgroup of six patients who excreted significant amounts of cardioinactive bacterial metabolites (digoxin reduction products [DRP]), the mean (+/- SD) percent urinary DRP excretion was less (p less than 0.05) during capsule (20.5% +/- 15.1%) than tablet (34.4% +/- 10.9%) dosing. Within-patient variability in urinary DRP excretion was much greater after tablets than capsules. Certain subgroups of patients should benefit from the enhanced bioavailability of digoxin capsule preparations.

A completely absorbed oral preparation of digoxin.

Digoxin absorption was studied in healthy volunteers by determination of peak plasma concentrations, areas under plasma concentration curves, and urinary excretion after single-dose administration. By comparison with an aqueous solution, increased rate and extent of absorption occurred from experimental soft gelatin formulations of digoxin in solution. Enhanced bioavailability of the capsules was not affected by altered volume of contained solvent. Digoxin was considerably better absorbed from capsules than from tablets of moderately high dissolution rate. Mean percentage intestinal absorption was 75% from tablet and 97% from capsules. Reduced between-subject variability accompanied the enhanced absorption from capsules.

Comparative effects of verapamil and isradipine on steady-state digoxin kinetics.

The effects on the steady-state digoxin pharmacokinetics of verapamil (240 mg/day) and a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, isradipine (15 mg/day), were compared. Nineteen healthy white men, aged 23 to 40 years, ingested 0.25 mg digoxin tablets every 12 hours for two consecutive periods of 2 weeks. Each subject also received one of the calcium channel blockers during one of these periods, with agent and sequence randomized. Analyst-blind RIA serum digoxin determinations demonstrated that the nine subjects who received isradipine, 5 mg t.i.d., had a small increment in peak digoxin level from 2.3 +/- 0.6 to 2.9 +/- 0.7 ng/ml (p less than 0.05) but no significant change in steady-state level or AUC over 12 hours. By contrast, the 10 subjects who received verapamil, 80 mg t.i.d., showed significant increases in steady-state (0.9 +/- 0.1 to 1.3 +/- 0.2 ng/ml; p less than 0.001) and peak serum digoxin concentrations (2.5 +/- 0.7 to 3.6 +/- 0.8 ng/ml; p less than 0.001) and in AUC (15.7 +/- 1.7 to 23.6 +/- 2.9 ng . hr/ml; p less than 0.001). Neither calcium channel blocker reduced renal digoxin clearance. Verapamil increases digoxin levels without affecting renal clearance. Isradipine has no clinically important interaction with digoxin.

Effect of metoclopramide on digoxin absorption from tablets and capsules.

The effect of metoclopramide, a drug that increases gut motility, on the consistency of digoxin absorption was examined in 16 healthy men. Each received the following four single-dose digoxin treatments in complete crossover fashion: two 0.25-mg digoxin tablets, alone, and two 0.2-mg digoxin capsules with metoclopramide. Mean serum AUCs over 24 hr (AUC-24) and cumulative urinary digoxin excretion over 48 hr (CUE-48) were of the same order for the tablets and capsules alone treatments. Metoclopramide reduced the mean AUC-24 for tablets from 12.26 +/- 2.70 to 9.38 +/- 3.78 ng X hr/ml (P less than 0.001) and the CUE-48 from 119.0 +/- 22.4 to 97.6 +/- 22.2 micrograms (P less than 0.01). There were no significant differences in mean AUC-24 (12.94 +/- 3.16 and 13.45 +/- 2.33 ng X hr/ml) and mean CUE-48 (117.8 +/- 23.4 and 109.7 +/- 25.0 micrograms) when capsules alone were compared to capsules with metoclopramide. Metoclopramide reduced the time to reach peak concentration for both digoxin dosage forms. The effect of metoclopramide on digoxin absorption is minimized by administration of digoxin in capsules.

Effects of lovastatin in diabetic patients treated with chlorpropamide.

Patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) have a higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease than nondiabetic subjects. In seven patients with both hypercholesterolemia and NIDDM controlled by chlorpropamide, lovastatin (20 mg b.i.d. for 6 weeks) lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 28%, total cholesterol by 24%, and apolipoprotein B by 24%. Lovastatin levels for a 4-hour period (measured as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitory activity) were similar to those measured previously in nondiabetic patients. Lovastatin did not alter chlorpropamide kinetics or glycemic profiles. No patient had an elevation in serum transaminases or creatinine phosphokinase, and no patient had any other laboratory or clinical drug-related adverse experience during the study. Lovastatin was as effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with NIDDM as in nondiabetic subjects. Diabetic control was unaltered, and no evidence of alteration in lovastatin or chlorpropamide blood levels was noted.

Comparative effects of propranolol and prazosin upon serum lipids in thiazide- treated hypertensive patients.

Earlier reported thiazide-induced changes in serum lipid concentrations were confirmed with increased triglyceride and total cholesterol levels. However, lipoprotein cholesterol ratios were unchanged. Propranolol caused further increases in triglyceride and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and lowered high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the high-density lipoprotein:total cholesterol ratio. With the addition of prazosin to the polythiazide regimen, there was a significant increase in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when compared with the placebo.

Multiclinic comparison of labetalol to metoprolol in treatment of mild to moderate systemic hypertension.

The antihypertensive effects of oral labetalol, a new alpha- and beta-adrenergic blocking agent, and metoprolol, a relatively beta1 selective adrenergic blocker, were evaluated in 91 patients with mild to moderate hypertension (standing diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 115 mm Hg) in a double-blind parallel group multicenter clinical trial. The effects of the two drugs on plasma lipids and lipoprotein fractions were also assessed. Following a four-week placebo phase, 44 patients were randomized to receive labetalol and 47 metoprolol. During a four-week titration phase, the labetalol dose was increased from 100 mg twice daily to a maximum of 600 mg twice daily to achieve a standing diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg that was decreased by 10 mm Hg or more. Metoprolol was titrated from 50 mg to 200 mg twice daily. An eight-week maintenance period followed during which hydrochlorothiazide could be added. At the end of the maintenance phase, the doses of labetalol and metoprolol were tapered over a two to four day period after which patients received a placebo for one week. Blood pressure in the supine and standing position was measured at each visit. Labetalol and metoprolol both significantly (p less than 0.01) lowered the supine and standing blood pressure from baseline with no significant difference found between the two treatment groups. Both drugs lowered the heart rate; however, the rate-lowering effect was significantly greater with metoprolol (p less than 0.01). There were no significant effects of either drug on plasma lipids or lipoprotein fractions. Fatigue was the most frequently reported complaint with both drugs. Dizziness, dyspepsia, and nausea were more common with labetalol; bradycardia was more common with metoprolol. There was no blood pressure "overshoot" after withdrawing drug treatment; however, a heart rate "overshoot" was seen after metoprolol was tapered off and stopped. Labetalol is as safe and effective as metoprolol in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Multicenter clinical evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of labetalol in treatment of hypertension.

The long-term efficacy and safety of labetalol, an antihypertensive agent with combined beta- and alpha-blocking activity, were evaluated alone (number = 193) and in combination with a diuretic (number = 144) in an open-label multicenter trial of 337 hypertensive patients aged 21 to 75 years, including initially 205 (61 percent) men and 219 (65 percent) Caucasians. There were 219 (65 percent) mild, 85 (25 percent) moderate, and 33 (10 percent) severe hypertensive patients. Labetalol (100 to 1,200 mg twice a day) alone or in combination with a diuretic reduced the mean standing blood pressure by 13/11 and 25/16 mm Hg to 135/88 and 130/91 mm Hg, respectively (p less than 0.01), and supine blood pressure by 6/7 and 18/13 mm Hg to 141/86 and 138/90 mm Hg (p less than 0.01), respectively. Blood pressure reductions observed at one month were maintained after one year; 206 (62 percent) patients had 10 mm Hg or greater reductions and 184 (56 percent) patients were maintained at diastolic blood pressures less than 90 mm Hg. Most frequently reported drug-related side effects included fatigue (14 percent), dizziness (12 percent), nausea (11 percent), nasal stuffiness (8 percent), headache (4 percent), and male sexual dysfunction (14 percent). Side effects were generally of mild to moderate intensity and often transient. In addition, in 27 (8 percent) patients reversible asymptomatic transaminase elevations to greater than twice normal developed at some time during the study. In 13 (4 percent) patients these alterations resolved during continued labetalol therapy, but in five (2 percent) patients these marked elevations led to discontinuation of the drug. A total of 32 (9.5 percent) patients were terminated prematurely due to side effects (most commonly genitourinary or gastrointestinal) possibly attributable to the drug. These findings indicate that labetalol with or without a diuretic is a potentially effective, safe, and relatively well-tolerated long-term antihypertensive therapy.

The effects of thiazide diuretics upon plasma lipoproteins.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 16 hypertensives, 4 weeks of 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide twice daily, caused significant elevations in total plasma cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides. Significant elevations in fasting plasma glucose and in plasma insulin were observed, but no correlation between individual lipid elevations and either glucose or insulin elevations was apparent. The metabolic effects developed within 2 weeks, and dissipated within 4 weeks. Changes induced within 4 weeks of treatment with hydrochlorothiazide were unaltered at 6 months. Hydrochlorothiazide induces elevation of all lipoprotein cholesterol fractions and VLDL-triglyceride. However, as the important ratio between LDL- and HDL-cholesterol is unchanged, coronary risk may be unchanged.

A comparison of minoxidil and hydralazine in non-azotemic hypertensives.

In 36 patients with normal renal function receiving hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol, lying diastolic blood pressure remained above 95 mmHg. In a double-blind trial, Step 3 therapy with 5-40 mg/day of minoxidil reduced blood pressure somewhat more effectively than 25-200 mg/day of hydralazine. The percentage of patients with lying diastolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg was 69 versus 35% at four weeks, and 55 versus 40% at 28 weeks. Transient falls in blood pressure within 4 h of any dose were greater with hydralazine which usually needed to be given in divided daily doses. Minoxidil caused tachycardia, and more adverse effects. Minoxidil is more effective, produces more consistent blood pressure control throughout the day, and may often be administered once daily.

Thromboxane and prostacyclin synthesis in experimental pancreas transplantation. Changes in parenchymal and vascular prostanoids.

The principal causes of failure of a pancreas transplant are rejection and vascular thrombosis. There is an unusually high attrition rate for pancreas transplants, but study models have been difficult to develop. In a rat model that allows study of acute rejection to the exclusion of nonspecific effects of transplant surgery on the pancreas, in vitro synthesis of prostacyclin (PGI2) and thromboxane A2 (TXA2) by transplanted pancreas and the blood vessels transplanted with it was measured using an RIA for their stable hydrolysis products 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha and thromboxane B2 (TXB2). TXB2 synthesis was significantly greater in allotransplanted pancreas than isotransplanted pancreas from the 5th day after transplantation. Rejection was complete in the allografted group 7-9 days after transplantation. 6-Keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha synthesis was similar in the pancreas for both allografts and isografts. Similar changes were seen in aorta, celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, and portal vein transplanted with the pancreas. In the transplanted aorta, TXB2 was significantly greater in the allograft group from the third posttransplant day. A group of CsA-treated allografts sampled after 9 days had transplanted pancreatic parenchymal and vascular prostanoid synthesis in the isograft range. The changes in PGI2 and TXA2 synthesis that accompany cellular rejection may mediate vascular failure in rejecting pancreas transplants, and changes in PGI2 and TXA2 synthesis in blood vessels transplanted with the pancreas could promote early vascular thrombosis.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin.

Numerous pharmacological agents have been shown to produce clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin. Drugs which reduce digoxin absorption include the antacids aluminium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide and magnesium trisilicate, the antidiarrhoeals kaolin and pectin, the hypocholesterolaemic agent cholestyramine and the chemotoxins cyclophosphamide, vincristine and bleomycin. Certain antibiotics including sulphasalazine, neomycin and aminosalicylic acid reduce digoxin absorption while others, including erythromycin and tetracycline, increase the bioavailability of digoxin in some patients. Capsule preparations of digoxin in solution are less subject to several of the interactions which affect the absorption and bioavailability of digoxin tablets. Various drugs induce alterations in the volume of distribution and clearance of digoxin. Cardiac patients receiving digoxin therapy are particularly prone to interactions with commonly co-administered medications such as the antiarrhythmics quinidine and amiodarone, the calcium channel blockers verapamil and nifedipine, and possibly some vasodilating agents. Studies of digoxin interactions have yielded discrepant results, indicating the need for careful analysis of investigational design before arriving at clinical conclusions.

Amlodipine versus atenolol in essential hypertension.

The efficacy and safety of amlodipine (2.5-10 mg) once daily was compared with atenolol (50-100 mg) once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study. A total of 125 patients were randomly allocated at the end of a 4-week run-in placebo period to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with amlodipine (n = 41), atenolol (n = 43), or placebo (n = 41). The placebo group had small mean changes in supine and standing blood pressure compared with baseline. The mean blood pressure changes from baseline 24 hours postdose in the amlodipine group (mean daily dose 8.8 mg) were -12.8/-10.1 mm Hg for supine blood pressure and -11.5/-9.8 mm Hg for standing blood pressure (p < 0.001 compared with placebo), and for the atenolol group (mean daily dose 83.7 mg) the changes were -11.3/-11.7 mm Hg for supine blood pressure and -13.3/-12.3 mm Hg for standing blood pressure (p < 0.001 compared with placebo). There were no statistically significant blood pressure differences between active treatments. The responder rates for amlodipine, atenolol, and placebo were 61.1, 64.9, and 11.1%, respectively. The blood pressure values taken over the 24-hour period at final visit revealed that amlodipine and atenolol maintained the supine blood pressure < or = 140/90 mm Hg throughout the period of observation; the corresponding time-effect curve for the placebo group was clearly in the hypertensive range. Both amlodipine and atenolol were well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)