RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF) is complex for patients and providers supporting them. Though prior studies have explored patient perspectives, no study has also included the separate perspectives of providers. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semi-structured individual interviews exploring the decision to undergo EF. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers who counsel patients about EF from across Canada. Data analysis was accomplished using thematic analysis. Data saturation was met after interviewing 13 providers and 12 patients. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified and explored, illuminating ways in which patients and providers navigate decision-making around EF: (1) patients viewed EF as a 'back-up plan' for delaying the decision about whether to have children, while providers were hesitant to present EF in this way given the uncertainty of success; (2) providers viewed ovarian reserve testing as essential while patients believed it unnecessarily complicated the decision; (3) patients and providers cited a need for change in broader societal attitudes regarding EF since social stigma was a significant barrier to decision-making; and (4) commonality and peer support were desired by patients to assist in their decision, although some providers were hesitant to recommend this to patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the decision to undergo EF is complex and individual patient values play a significant role. In some areas, there is disconnect between providers and patients in their views on how to navigate EF decision-making, and these should be addressed in discussions between providers and patients to improve shared decision-making.
Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade , Criança , Humanos , Tomada de Decisões , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , CanadáRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers. METHODS: This qualitative study involved a needs assessment via individual interviews. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers from across Canada who counsel patients considering EF. 25 participants were included (13 providers and 12 patients). The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Interviews were transcribed, and transcripts analyzed for themes and concepts using NVIVO 12. FINDINGS: Multiple factors contributing to decisional difficulty were identified, including: (1) multiple reproductive options available with differing views from patients/providers regarding their importance; (2) a decision typically made under the pressure of reproductive aging; (3) uncertainty surrounding the technology/inadequate outcome data; (4) the financial burden of EF; (5) inherent uncertainty relating to potential decision regret; and (6) differing perceptions between patients/providers regarding the role providers should play in the decision. Additionally, potential sources of decisional support were identified, including provision of basic information before and/or during initial consultation, followed by an opportunity during or after initial consultation for clarifying information and helping with value judgements. Individualized counselling based on patient values, adequate follow-up, psychosocial counselling, and peer support were also emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: More decisional support for women considering EF is needed. Suggestions include a patient decision aid in conjunction with modified healthcare provider counselling, support and follow up.
Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Aconselhamento , Tomada de Decisões , Pessoal de Saúde , Avaliação das Necessidades , Reprodução , Comportamento Reprodutivo , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the pregnancy and postpartum self-reported mood and mental health status of women who conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) with those of women who conceived spontaneously. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 1176 pregnant women from prenatal clinics in the Ontario Birth Study were enrolled. In the pregnancy and the postpartum period, women who conceived with ART, including in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination, were compared with women who conceived spontaneously regarding depression and anxiety at 12-16 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation and 6-10 weeks postpartum. The following main outcome measures were used: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, two-item Patient Health Questionnaire, State Trait Anxiety Inventory six-item scale, and two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). RESULTS: Women who conceived with ART demonstrated a decreased likelihood of depression compared with women who spontaneously conceived (SC) at 24-28 weeks gestation (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: ART 3.6% vs. SC 15%; P < 0.01; two-item Patient Health Questionnaire: ART 0.0% vs. SC 4.0%; Pâ¯=â¯0.027), as well as decreased perceived stress (mean score: ART 3.25 vs. SC 4.02; P < 0.01). Women in the ART group also had a lower percentage of positive two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scores (ART 2.7% vs. SC 7.5%; Pâ¯=â¯0.049). There was no difference in self-reported depression, anxiety, or perceived stress between groups at 12-16 weeks gestation or at 6-10 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSION: Women who conceived using ART reported decreased rates of depressive symptoms, perceived stress, and generalized anxiety during the second trimester of pregnancy compared with women who had SC pregnancies, and both groups experienced similar mental health status earlier in gestation and in the postpartum period.
Assuntos
Fertilização , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Depressão Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Ontário , Período Pós-Parto , Cuidado Pré-Concepcional , Gravidez , Trimestres da Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Estudos Prospectivos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of antenatal corticosteroid administration (ACS) on fetal thymus growth in women who received ACS compared with gestational-age-matched controls. STUDY DESIGN: Fetal thymus size and growth were measured in women at risk for preterm delivery who received ACS and compared with a matched cohort of women who were at low risk for preterm delivery and did not receive ACS. Fetal thymus perimeter and diameter were measured by 2-D ultrasound at baseline and every 2 weeks until delivery. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, ACS exposure was associated with a significant reduction in thymus perimeter size (-0.70; 95% CI: -1.33, -0.07; P = 0.03). For every additional week of exposure, thymus growth trajectory was significantly decreased in ACS-exposed fetuses (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The association between ACS and reduced fetal thymus growth should be further examined to establish the impact of ACS on childhood thymus development and immune programming.