Overall survival in the UK in mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: comparative effectiveness of mogamulizumab versus current standard of care.

Aim: Due to extensive treatment switching in the MAVORIC trial, lack of UK regulatory licence for the comparator, overall survival (OS) with mogamulizumab was compared with patients with previously treated advanced mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) in real-world setting. Design, setting & participants: Data were from the Hospital Episode Statistics database (all patients in NHS secondary care system in 2009-2019). Patients were selected according to trial inclusion criteria, then trial and HES samples were matched on selected variables with significant imbalance. Outcomes: The analysis indicated significant improvement in OS for mogamulizumab treatment compared with UK clinical practice (hazard ratio: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.53). Conclusion: Results suggest an OS advantage for patients with advanced MF/SS treated with mogamulizumab in MAVORIC trial compared with UK clinical practice.

Cost-utility analysis of mogamulizumab in advanced mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Aim: This study assessed the cost-utility of mogamulizumab, a novel monoclonal antibody, versus established clinical management (ECM) in UK patients in previously treated advanced mycosis fungoides (MF)/Sézary syndrome (SS). Materials & methods: Lifetime partitioned survival model based on overall survival, next treatment-free survival and the use of allogeneic stem cell transplant was developed. Inputs were from the pivotal MAVORIC trial, real-world evidence and published literature. Extensive sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Discounted incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were 3.08, £86,998 and £28,233. Results were most sensitive to the survival extrapolations, utilities and costs after loss of disease control. Conclusion: Mogamulizumab is a cost-effective alternative to ECM in UK patients with previously treated advanced MF/SS.

Adjusting for treatment crossover in the MAVORIC trial: survival in advanced mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

Background: Relative overall survival (OS) estimates reported in the MAVORIC trial are potentially confounded by a high proportion of patients randomized to vorinostat switching to mogamulizumab; furthermore, vorinostat is not used in clinical practice in the UK. Methods: Three methods were considered for crossover adjustment. Survival post-crossover adjustment was compared with data from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) to contextualize estimates. Results: Following adjustment, the OS hazard ratio for mogamulizumab versus vorinostat was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.98) using the method considered most appropriate based on an assessment of assumptions and comparison with HES. Conclusions: OS of mogamulizumab relative to vorinostat may be underestimated in MAVORIC due to the presence of crossover. The HES database was used to validate this adjustment.

Health state utilities associated with caring for an individual with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

AIM: Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL) is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by skin lesions, which can negatively impact the quality of life of both patients and their caregivers. The Decision Support Unit (DSU) at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK recently outlined a rationale for the inclusion of caregiver burden in economic evaluations. This study aimed to estimate utilities for health states associated with being a caregiver for an individual with CTCL at different stages of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A targeted literature review and interviews with CTCL specialists informed the development of health state vignettes describing the experience caring for an individual with CTCL. The vignettes were evaluated in interviews with the UK general population using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the time trade-off (TTO) method and the EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: Four vignettes were developed describing the caregiver experience for an individual with CTCL on i) second line treatment, ii) third line treatment, iii) end of life care, iv) a post-patient death. One hundred interviews were conducted to evaluate the health state vignettes. The pattern of results was similar across the evaluation methods: second line treatment (VAS: 39.2, TTO = 0.52, EQ-5D-5L: 0.56), third line treatment (VAS: 31.1, TTO = 0.39, EQ-5D-5L: 0.37), end of life care (VAS: 28.2, TTO = 0.37, EQ-5D-5L: 0.31) and post-patient death (VAS: 41.2, TTO = 0.63, EQ-5D-5L: 0.59). Limitations and conclusions: These findings highlight the substantial burden of caring for an individual with CTCL and the importance of including caregiver burden in the health technology assessment review process. A limitation is the hypothetical vignette approach, which meant the TTO participants did not have experience of caring for individuals with CTCL, but were imagining this state. There is also the possibility that they may also be considering the patient experience when responding to the questions.

A stochastic economic evaluation of letrozole versus tamoxifen as a first-line hormonal therapy: for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal patients.

BACKGROUND: Letrozole is a third-generation aromatase inhibitor that is a feasible alternative to tamoxifen as a first-line hormonal therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the results of an economic evaluation comparing letrozole and tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapies in postmenopausal women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer. PERSPECTIVE: UK National Health Service. DESIGN: A decision model (Markov process) was built describing possible patient pathways from the point of diagnosis to death. The model was populated using patient-specific clinical trial data, data from the existing literature, and expert opinion. Stochastic analyses of the model were undertaken, whereby the majority of the input parameters were described as probability distributions to represent the uncertainty about their true value. Costs were presented in year 2000 values. RESULTS: The baseline results showed that letrozole is a cost-effective alternative to tamoxifen with a mean incremental cost per life-year gained of pound 2342, whilst the incremental cost increases to just over pound 10,000 at the 95th percentile of the cost-effectiveness range (2000 values). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the economic analysis indicate that letrozole is a cost-effective alternative first-line therapy compared with tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, achieving additional life-years with a modest increase in costs.