Persistence and safety of anti-TNF biosimilars versus originators in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: an observational study on the French National Health Data System.

OBJECTIVES: Biosimilar-originator equivalence has been demonstrated in phase 3 trials in a few indications of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab. The objective of our study was to compare the persistence and safety of biosimilars versus originators in all the licensed indications of these molecules. METHODS: We used data from the French National Health Data System (SNDS), covering 99% of the French population, to identify infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab initiators from biosimilar launch (January 2015, May 2016 and October 2018, respectively) to 30 June 2021. Patients were then followed for 1 year. Treatment persistence (duration without treatment discontinuation or modification) and safety (including severe infections, all-cause hospitalisation and death) were compared between originator and biosimilar users by Cox regressions weighting the populations on the inverse probability of treatment. Analyses were performed by molecule, by disease and by biosimilar product. RESULTS: From January 2015 to June 2021, 86 776 patients were included in the study: 22 670, 24 442 and 39 664 patients had initiated infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, respectively; 49 752 (53%) were biosimilar initiators. We did not find any risk of discontinuation (HRs were below or around 1, here all pathologies and products together: infliximab 0.88 (0.80-0.97), etanercept 0.85 (0.81-0.90) and adalimumab 0.96 (0.91-1.00)) or safety event (infection: infliximab 0.97 (0.78-1.21), etanercept 1.04 (0.81-1.33) and adalimumab 0.98 (0.83-1.16); hospitalisation: infliximab 1.08 (0.96-1.23), etanercept 0.99 (0.87-1.11) and adalimumab 0.91 (0.83-0.99)) associated with biosimilar versus originator use. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows reassuring results regarding the persistence and safety of biosimilar tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors compared with originators in all licensed indications.

Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions at Biosimilar versus Originator Rituximab Treatment Initiation, Switch and Over Time: A Cohort Study on the French National Health Data System.

BACKGROUND: Biosimilar products of rituximab came to market in 2017. French pharmacovigilance centers have highlighted an excess of case reports of severe hypersensitivity reactions related to their use compared with the originator product. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the real-world association between biosimilar versus originator rituximab injections and hypersensitivity reactions, among initiators and switchers, at first injection and over time. METHODS: The French National Health Data System was used to identify all rituximab users between 2017 and 2021. A first cohort consisted of patients who initiated rituximab (originator or biosimilar), while a second cohort consisted of originator-to-biosimilar switchers, matched on age, sex, deliveries history, and pathology, with one or two patients still receiving the originator product. The event of interest was defined as a hospitalization for anaphylactic shock or serum sickness following a rituximab injection. RESULTS: A total of 91,894 patients were included in the initiation cohort-17,605 (19%) with the originator product and 74,289 (81%) with a biosimilar. At initiation, 86/17,605 (0.49%) and 339/74,289 (0.46%) events occurred in the originator and biosimilar groups, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of biosimilar exposure associated with the event was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.34), and the adjusted hazard ratio for biosimilar versus originator exposure was 1.15 (95% CI 0.93-1.42), showing no increased risk of event with biosimilar use at first injection, and over time. 17,123 switchers were matched to 24,659 non-switchers. No association was found between switch to biosimilars and occurrence of the event. CONCLUSION: Our study does not support any association between exposure to rituximab biosimilars versus originator and hospitalization for a hypersensitivity reaction, either at initiation, at switch, or over time.

Roll-out and effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in France: An overview.

CONTEXT: Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been available and fully reimbursed for people at high risk of sexually acquired HIV infection in France since January 2016. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the roll-out of PrEP use in France and its real-life effectiveness. The main results of two previously published studies were presented at the second e-congress of the EPI-PHARE scientific interest group on pharmacoepidemiology and public decision support held in June 2022, and are reported in this article. METHODS: Two studies were carried out using the French National Health Data System (SNDS) covering 99% of the French population. A first study aimed to evaluate the roll-out of PrEP use in France from its implementation until June 2021, globally over the entire study period, including an assessment of the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that started in February 2020 in France. A second study using a nested case-control design was conducted in a cohort of men at high risk of HIV acquisition included between January 2016 and June 2020 to assess the effectiveness of PrEP in the real world. RESULTS: As of 30 June 2021, a total of 42 159 people had initiated PrEP in France. Initiations increased steadily until February 2020, then slowed down sharply from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and resumed from the first half of 2021. PrEP users were overwhelmingly men (98%), with an average age of 36 years, living in a large urban area (74%), and of whom a minority (7%) were socioeconomically disadvantaged. Throughout the study period, the level of PrEP maintenance from one semester to the next was high (80-90%). However, for 20% of PrEP initiators, no prescription renewals were recorded during the first six months, suggesting a substantial proportion of early treatment discontinuation. A minority (21%) of PrEP renewal prescriptions were made by private practitioners. Among 46 706 men at high risk of HIV infection, 256 patients identified with HIV infection were matched with 1213 controls. PrEP was used by 29% of cases and 49% of controls. Overall, PrEP effectiveness reached 60% (95% confidence interval 46% to 71%), and was increased in people with high PrEP use (93% (84% to 97%)), or after excluding periods of treatment discontinuation (86% (79% to 92%)). PrEP effectiveness was significantly reduced in people under 30 years of age (26% (-21% to 54%)) and in socioeconomically disadvantaged people (-64% (-392% to 45%)), for whom low PrEP uptake rates or high PrEP discontinuation rates were frequently observed. CONCLUSION: PrEP roll-out has been strongly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Although it has been substantial among men who have sex with men, additional measures are needed to expand access to PrEP to all other population groups that could benefit from it. Promoting adherence to PrEP (especially among young people and the socioeconomically disadvantaged) will be essential to ensure a higher level of PrEP effectiveness, which has been shown to be lower in real-life settings than in clinical trials.

Drug survival and safety of biosimilars and originator adalimumab in the treatment of psoriasis: a multinational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Adalimumab is an effective but previously expensive biological treatment for psoriasis. The introduction of biosimilars following the patent expiry of the originator adalimumab Humira has reduced the unit cost of treatment. However, the long-term effectiveness and safety of adalimumab biosimilars for treating psoriasis in real-world settings are uncertain and may be a barrier to widespread usage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study aims to compare the drug survival and safety of adalimumab biosimilars to adalimumab originator for the treatment of psoriasis. We will use both routinely collected healthcare databases and dedicated pharmacovigilance registries from the PsoNet initiative, including data from the UK, France and Spain. We will conduct a cohort study using a prevalent new user design. We will match patients on previous adalimumab exposure time to create two equal-sized cohorts of biosimilar and originator users. The coprimary outcomes are drug survival, defined by the time from cohort entry to discontinuation of the drug of interest; and risk of serious adverse events, defined by adverse events leading to hospitalisation or death. Cox proportional hazards models will be fitted to calculate HRs as the effect estimate for the outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The participating registries agree with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from local ethics committees. The results of the study will be published in scientific journals and presented at international dermatology conferences by the end of 2023.

TNF-alpha inhibitors biosimilar use in France: a nationwide population-based study using the French National Health Data System.

TNF-alpha inhibitors have revolutionized the therapeutic care in chronic inflammatory diseases. Several biosimilar products were commercialized at their patent expiry, substantially decreasing the cost of treatment. This longitudinal descriptive study aimed at assessing infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab biosimilar penetration rates using data of the French National Health Data System. A total of 207,118 new or prevalent users from the date of first biosimilar commercialization in France (respectively January 2015, May 2016 and October 2018) were included in the study and followed until September 30, 2021. Biosimilars represented respectively 78%, 46% and 53% of the overall initiations, and 94%, 66% and 60% last year's initiations. A total of 46%, 19% and 17% of originator product prevalent users switched for a biosimilar during the follow-up. Biosimilar penetration rate was much higher for infliximab than for its counterparts, due to its hospital delivery modality. Biosimilar initiation and originator-to-biosimilar switch tended to be observed more in rheumatology than in the other specialties. Biosimilar use was mostly consistent across patient socio-demographic characteristics. Biosimilar initiation rate increased rapidly from their market arrival and originator-to-biosimilar switch rate remained moderate, highlighting the need and usefulness of political action and biosimilar use tracking.

Real-world effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis in men at high risk of HIV infection in France: a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has shown high efficacy in clinical trials, but few observational studies have confirmed its effectiveness when prescribed in real life to users with diverse profiles. This study aimed to assess real-world PrEP effectiveness. METHODS: We did a matched, nested case-control study among adult men at high risk of HIV infection between Jan 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, using data from the French national health data system. Men who were newly diagnosed with HIV infection up to Dec 31, 2020, were individually matched with up to five controls for age, socioeconomic status, place of residence, calendar year, and follow-up duration. PrEP use was characterised on the basis of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine dispensing over time. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of PrEP use associated with HIV infection. PrEP effectiveness (computed as 1-adjusted OR), was estimated overall, by mode of PrEP use, and by individuals' sociodemographic characteristics. FINDINGS: Among a total of 46 706 individuals, 256 patients with HIV infection were identified and matched with 1213 controls. PrEP users accounted for 29% of cases and 49% of controls. PrEP effectiveness was 60% (95% CI 46 to 71) overall, reaching 93% (84 to 97) for a high amount of PrEP consumption, and 86% (78 to 92) if excluding periods after PrEP discontinuation. PrEP effectiveness was significantly reduced in people younger than 30 years (26% [-21 to 54]) and in those who were socioeconomically deprived (-64% [-392 to 45]), both of which groups showed low amounts of PrEP consumption and high rates of PrEP discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: PrEP effectiveness appears to be lower in real-world conditions than is reported in clinical trials. Strengthening efforts to improve the monitoring of PrEP compliance will be essential to ensure PrEP effectiveness, especially among young and socioeconomically deprived recipients. FUNDING: None.