Spinal artery infarction. / Arterielt spinalt infarkt.

Spinal cord infarctions are rare, and the symptoms vary depending on location and size. One patient presented with severe neck pain and paresis of the left arm. Compression of a cervical nerve root was initially suspected, but the progression of symptoms and MRI findings gradually suggested a different aetiology.

Endovascular thrombectomy and intra-arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Most disabling strokes are due to a blockage of a large artery in the brain by a blood clot. Prompt removal of the clot with intra-arterial thrombolytic drugs or mechanical devices, or both, can restore blood flow before major brain damage has occurred, leading to improved recovery. However, these so-called endovascular interventions can cause bleeding in the brain. This is a review of randomised controlled trials of endovascular thrombectomy or intra-arterial thrombolysis, or both, for acute ischaemic stroke. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether endovascular thrombectomy or intra-arterial interventions, or both, plus medical treatment are superior to medical treatment alone in people with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Trials Registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group and Cochrane Vascular Group (last searched 1 September 2020), CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library, 1 September 2020), MEDLINE (May 2010 to 1 September 2020), and Embase (May 2010 to 1 September 2020). We also searched trials registers, screened reference lists, and contacted researchers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any endovascular intervention plus medical treatment compared with medical treatment alone in people with definite ischaemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (MBR and MJ) applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed trial quality. Two review authors (MBR and HL) assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We obtained both published and unpublished data if available. Our primary outcome was favourable functional outcome at the end of the scheduled follow-up period, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Eighteen trials (i.e. all but one included trial) reported their outcome at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were death from all causes at in the acute phase and by the end of follow-up, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in the acute phase and by the end of follow-up, neurological status at the end of follow-up, and degree of recanalisation. MAIN RESULTS: We included 19 studies with a total of 3793 participants. The majority of participants had large artery occlusion in the anterior circulation, and were treated within six hours of symptom onset with endovascular thrombectomy. Treatment increased the chance of achieving a good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2: risk ratio (RR) 1.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37 to 1.63; 3715 participants, 18 RCTs; high-certainty evidence). Treatment also reduced the risk of death at end of follow-up: RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.97; 3793 participants, 19 RCTs; high-certainty evidence) without increasing the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in the acute phase: RR 1.46 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.36; 1559 participants, 6 RCTs; high-certainty evidence) or by end of follow-up: RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.52; 1752 participants, 10 RCTs; high-certainty evidence); however, the wide confidence intervals preclude any firm conclusion. Neurological recovery to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0 to 1 and degree of recanalisation rates were better in the treatment group: RR 2.03 (95% CI 1.21 to 3.40; 334 participants, 3 RCTs; high-certainty evidence) and RR 3.11 (95% CI 2.18 to 4.42; 268 participants, 3 RCTs; high-certainty evidence), respectively. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with acute ischaemic stroke due to large artery occlusion in the anterior circulation, endovascular thrombectomy can increase the chance of survival with a good functional outcome without increasing the risk of intracerebral haemorrhage or death.

A man in his fifties with increasing motor fluctuations, sleep impairment and altered mental status. / En mann i 50-årene med økende motoriske svingninger, søvnvansker og mental endring.

BACKGROUND/CASE PRESENTATION: A man in his fifties with advanced Parkinson´s disease was admitted with increasing motor fluctuations including dyskinesias, as well as hallucinations and delusions. After reduction of oral dopaminergic treatment, the dyskinesias improved, but the psychotic symptoms persisted. They were perceived as levodopa-induced, despite concurrent prominent bradykinetic-rigid symptoms. Dopaminergic treatment was therefore discontinued. He subsequently developed hyperthermia, severe generalised rigidity and akinesia, and autonomic instability. Parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia syndrome was diagnosed, and continuous intraduodenal levodopa/carbidopa infusion was initiated. Despite this, he had several episodes of respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation, as well as bradycardia and a single asystole. Although motor and autonomic dysfunction slowly improved, severe akinetic-rigid and neuropsychiatric symptoms persisted, with poor response to increased levodopa. On vital indication, electroconvulsive therapy was performed with clear improvement of mobility and mental state. A hip fracture requiring surgery necessitated discontinuation of ECT, which failed to show equivalent effect when resumed. His condition was considered terminal and all active treatment ceased, resulting in death a few weeks later. INTERPRETATION: Parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia syndrome can develop if dopaminergic treatment is reduced abruptly and excessively. Coexistence of confusion and/or psychosis and clear bradykinetic-rigid symptoms should alarm the clinician. Dopaminergic treatment should not be discontinued, but given intraduodenally. ECT can be effective if started sufficiently early and administered frequently.

Effects of Candesartan in the Acute Phase of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Uncertainty persists over the effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We assessed the effects of treatment with candesartan in acute ICH and according to different types of hematoma. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of the Scandinavian Candesartan Acute Stroke Trial, a randomized- and placebo-controlled, double-masked trial of candesartan in patients with any stroke within the acute phase (<30 hours) and high systolic blood pressure (≥140 mm Hg). We collected baseline computed tomography scans of participants with ICH, and characterized hematoma volume (planimetric approach), location (deep versus lobar or infratentorial), hemisphere side, and presence of intraventricular hemorrhage. The trial's 2 coprimary effect variables were the composite endpoint of vascular death, stroke or myocardial infarction, and functional outcome at 6 months according to the modified Rankin scale. We used Cox, ordinal, and binary logistic regression for analysis and adjusted for key, predefined prognostic variables. RESULTS: Of 274 participants with ICH, computed tomography scans were available in 205 patients (74.8%). There were no significant differences between the candesartan and placebo groups with respect to hematoma volume (median 15.6 mL versus 13.5 mL, P = .96), deep location (77% versus 72%, P = .64), right hemisphere (49% versus 51%, P = .46), and presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (18% versus 11%, P = .22). Candesartan was associated with a significant increase in poor functional outcome in patients with deep hematoma (adjusted common odds ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.23-4.18, P = .009, P for interaction .015), but there was no differential effect on functional outcome or vascular events in any of the other imaging subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Candesartan was not associated with any beneficial effect when initiated in the acute phase of ICH, a possible adverse effect on functional outcome in patients with deep hematomas cannot be ruled out by this study alone.

Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment in different subtypes of acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Scandinavian Candesartan Acute Stroke Trial (SCAST) found no benefits of blood pressure-lowering treatment with candesartan in acute stroke. We have investigated whether the effect of treatment is different in different subtypes of ischemic stroke. METHODS: SCAST was a randomized- and placebo-controlled trial of candesartan in 2029 patients presenting within 30 hours of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg. Ischemic stroke subtype was categorized by the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification. There were 2 primary effect variables: the composite vascular end point of vascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke during the first 6 months and functional outcome at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 1733 patients with ischemic stroke were included: total anterior circulation infarcts in 129, partial anterior in 850, posterior in 236, and lacunar in 510 patients. For functional outcome there was a significant trend toward a better effect of candesartan in patients with larger infarcts (total anterior circulation or partial anterior circulation) than in patients with smaller infarcts (lacunar infarction; P=0.02). For the composite vascular end point, there were no differences in treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the effect of blood pressure-lowering treatment with candesartan may differ according to different types of acute ischemic stroke, but this needs to be confirmed in future trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00120003.

Pseudoperipheral palsy: a case of subcortical infarction imitating peripheral neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Vascular damage in the central hand knob area can mimic peripheral motor nerve deficits. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a woman presenting with apparent peripheral neuropathy. Brain magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography revealed an infarct in the precentral hand knob area, with significant stenosis in the right proximal middle cerebral artery trunk. Subsequent 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the brain suggested cerebral angiitis. The patient experienced improved hand function following combined glucocorticoid and cyclophosphamide treatment. CONCLUSION: Vascular damage in the hand knob area should be considered when evaluating peripheral motor nerve deficits in the presence of normal nerve conduction velocities. The diagnosis of cerebral angiitis remains a major challenge for clinicians.

Blood pressure-lowering treatment with candesartan in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early and intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment seems to be beneficial in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke and high blood pressure. We wanted to see if similar benefits can be shown from a later and more gradual blood pressure lowering, using data from the Scandinavian Candesartan Acute Stroke Trial (SCAST). METHODS: SCAST was a randomized- and placebo-controlled, double-masked trial of candesartan given for 7 days, in 2029 patients with acute stroke and systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg. We assessed the effects of candesartan in the 274 patients with hemorrhagic stroke, using the trial's 2 coprimary effect variables: the composite vascular end point of vascular death, stroke or myocardial infarction, and functional outcome at 6 months, according to the modified Rankin Scale. We used Cox proportional hazards models and ordinal regression for analysis and adjusted for key, predefined prognostic variables. RESULTS: There was no association between treatment with candesartan and risk of vascular events (17 of 144 [11.8%] versus 13 of 130 [10.0%]; hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-2.83; P=0.41). For functional outcome we found evidence of a negative effect of candesartan (common odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.50; P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that blood pressure-lowering treatment with candesartan is beneficial during the first week of hemorrhagic stroke. Instead, there were signs that such treatment may be harmful, but this needs to be verified in larger studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00120003.

Ischaemic stroke with patent foramen ovale.

BACKGROUND: There is no sound scientific documentation of current guidelines for the treatment of cerebral infarction assumed to be due to patent foramen ovale. In this article, we present a young patient with this condition. In addition, we provide a general overview of the prevalence, recommended assessment and indications for treatment of patent foramen ovale in ischaemic stroke patients. METHOD: The article is based on a non-systematic search in PubMed. We emphasise three recently published randomised trials on the subject. RESULTS: Transoesophageal echocardiography with saline contrast is the gold standard for detecting patent foramen ovale. Just who will benefit from the diagnosis and treatment of this condition remains unclear, however. None of the three randomised studies of antithrombotic treatment versus transcatheter closure in patients who have suffered ischaemic stroke show a difference in outcomes, but subgroup analyses indicate that closure in young patients (age <50 years) with a large foramen ovale reduces the number of recurrent ischaemic events. Two other randomised studies of antithrombotic treatment alone versus closure are presently ongoing. INTERPRETATION: For stroke patients with patent foramen ovale, the choice between lifelong antithrombotic therapy alone and transcatheter closure is a difficult one. Treatment with antiplatelet agents remains the first choice in most cases. Well-designed studies are needed to identify which patients will benefit most from closure.

An unusual case of the syndrome of cervical rib with subclavian artery thrombosis and cerebellar and cerebral infarctions.

BACKGROUND: Cerebellar and cerebral infarctions caused by the syndrome of cervical rib with thrombosis of subclavian artery are very unusual. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 49-year-old male patient with a right cervical rib compression leading to subclavian arterial thrombosis and both cerebellar and cerebral infarctions secondary to retrograde thromboembolisation. Follow-up imaging revealed partial resolution of the thrombosis after combined anti-coagulant and anti-platelet therapy. The cervical rib and first costa were surgically removed to prevent additional events. CONCLUSION: Cervical rib vascular compression should be promptly diagnosed and treated in order to avoid further complications, including cerebrovascular ischemic events.

[a woman with recurrence of venous and arterial thrombosis]. / En kvinne med tilbakevendende arteriovenøse tromboser.

BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability leading to arterial or venous thrombosis and embolism in patients with cancer is a known phenomenon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe a 62 year old woman with a clinical course compatible with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome but seronegative findings and mucinous lung cancer. The case is discussed with reference to literature from a non-systematic PubMed search. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: Diagnoses of cerebral and cardiac infarcts, deep venous thrombosis and lung embolism led to a diagnosis of lung cancer by biopsy and positron emission tomography (PET). Early recurrence of venous and arterial thromboses or poor response to anticoagulation and antiplatelets should initiate cancer search in the assessment of such stroke patients. Especially the combination of venous and arterial thromboses should raise suspicion of cancer. PET and surgical cancer treatment should be evaluated at an early stage.

Tenecteplase in wake-up ischemic stroke trial: Protocol for a randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with wake-up ischemic stroke who have evidence of salvageable tissue on advanced imaging can benefit from intravenous thrombolysis. It is not known whether patients who do not fulfil such imaging criteria might benefit from treatment, but studies indicate that treatment based on non-contrast CT criteria may be safe. Tenecteplase has shown promising results in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The aim of the Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischemic Stroke Trial (TWIST) is to compare the effect of thrombolytic treatment with tenecteplase and standard care versus standard care alone in patients with wake-up ischemic stroke selected by non-contrast CT. METHODS/DESIGN: TWIST is an international, investigator-initiated, multi-centre, prospective, randomized-controlled, open-label, blinded end-point trial of tenecteplase (n = 300) versus standard care (n = 300) in patients who wake up with an acute ischemic stroke and can be treated within 4.5 h upon awakening. Seventy-seven centres in 10 countries (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom) participate. The primary outcome is the modified Rankin Scale on the ordinal scale (0-6) at three months. DISCUSSION: TWIST aims to determine the effect and safety of thrombolytic treatment with tenecteplase in patients with wake-up ischemic stroke selected by non-contrast CT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03181360. EudraCT Number 2014-000096-80.

Current Medical and Surgical Stroke Prevention Therapies for Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Carotid Artery Stenosis (CAS) is a marker of systemic atherosclerosis and patients with CAS are at high risk of vascular events in multiple vascular locations, including ipsilateral ischemic stroke. Both medical and surgical therapies have been demonstrated effective in reducing this risk. The optimal management for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis remains controversial. In patients with symptomatic CAS ≥70%, CEA has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of stroke. With the risk of recurrent stroke being particularly high in the first 2 weeks after the first event, Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty with stenting provides maximal benefits to patients with symptomatic CAS ≥70% if performed within this «2-week¼ target. Several large ongoing trials are currently comparing the risks and benefits of carotid revascularization versus medical therapy alone.