Limitations of Molecular and Antigen Test Performance for SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Contacts.

COVID-19 has brought unprecedented attention to the crucial role of diagnostics in pandemic control. We compared severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test performance by sample type and modality in close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases. Close contacts of SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals were enrolled after informed consent. Clinician-collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in viral transport media (VTM) were tested with a routine clinical reference nucleic acid test (NAT) and PerkinElmer real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay; positive samples were tested for infectivity using a VeroE6TMPRSS2 cell culture model. Self-collected passive drool was also tested using the PerkinElmer RT-PCR assay. For the first 4 months of study, midturbinate swabs were tested using the BD Veritor rapid antigen test. Between 17 November 2020 and 1 October 2021, 235 close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases were recruited, including 95 with symptoms (82% symptomatic for ≤5 days) and 140 asymptomatic individuals. Reference NATs were positive for 53 (22.6%) participants; 24/50 (48%) were culture positive. PerkinElmer testing of NP and saliva samples identified an additional 28 (11.9%) SARS-CoV-2 cases who tested negative by reference NAT. Antigen tests performed for 99 close contacts showed 83% positive percent agreement (PPA) with reference NAT among early symptomatic persons, but 18% PPA in others; antigen tests in 8 of 11 (72.7%) culture-positive participants were positive. Contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases may be falsely negative early after contact, but more sensitive platforms may identify these cases. Repeat or serial SARS-CoV-2 testing with both antigen and molecular assays may be warranted for individuals with high pretest probability for infection.

Biliary Atresia Relevant Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Recapitulate Key Disease Features in a Dish.

Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common cause of pediatric end-stage liver disease and the etiology is poorly understood. There is no effective therapy for BA partly due to lack of human BA models. Towards developing in vitro human models of BA, disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from 6 BA patients were generated using non-integrating episomal plasmids. In addition, to determine the functional significance of BA-susceptibility genes identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in biliary development, a genome-editing approach was used to create iPSCs with defined mutations in these GWAS BA loci. Using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 system, isogenic iPSCs deficient in BA-associated genes (GPC1 and ADD3) were created from healthy iPSCs. Both the BA patient-iPSCs and the knock out (KO) iPSCs were studied for their in vitro biliary differentiation potential. These BA-specific iPSCs demonstrated significantly decreased formation of ductal structures, decreased expression of biliary markers including CK7, EpCAM, SOX9, CK19, AE2, and CFTR and increased fibrosis markers such as alpha smooth muscle actin, Loxl2, and Collagen1 compared to controls. Both the patient- and the KO-iPSCs also showed increased yes-associated protein (YAP, a marker of bile duct proliferation/fibrosis). Collagen and YAP were reduced by treatment with the anti-fibrogenic drug pentoxifylline. In summary, these BA-specific human iPSCs showed deficiency in biliary differentiation along with increased fibrosis, the 2 key disease features of BA. These iPSCs can provide new human BA models for understanding the molecular basis of abnormal biliary development and opportunities to identify drugs that have therapeutic effects on BA.

Limitations of molecular and antigen test performance for SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 contacts.

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 has brought unprecedented attention to the crucial role of diagnostics in pandemic control. We compared SARS-CoV-2 test performance by sample type and modality in close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases. METHODS: Close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals were enrolled after informed consent. Clinician-collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in viral transport media (VTM) were tested with a nucleic acid test (NAT). NP VTM and self-collected passive drool were tested using the PerkinElmer real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assay. For the first 4 months of study, mid-turbinate swabs were tested using the BD Veritor rapid antigen test. NAT positive NP samples were tested for infectivity using a VeroE6TMPRSS2 cell culture model. RESULTS: Between November 17, 2020, and October 1, 2021, 235 close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases were recruited, including 95 with symptoms (82% symptomatic for < 5 days) and 140 asymptomatic individuals. NP swab reference tests were positive for 53 (22.6%) participants; 24/50 (48%) were culture positive. PerkinElmer testing of NP and saliva samples identified an additional 28 (11.9%) SARS-CoV-2 cases who tested negative by clinical NAT. Antigen tests performed for 99 close contacts showed 83% positive percent agreement (PPA) with reference NAT among early symptomatic persons, but 18% PPA in others; antigen tests in 8 of 11 (72.7%) culture-positive participants were positive. CONCLUSIONS: Contacts of SARS-CoV-2 cases may be falsely negative early after contact, which more sensitive platforms may identify. Repeat or serial SARS-CoV-2 testing with both antigen and molecular assays may be warranted for individuals with high pretest probability for infection.