Co-Membership-based Generic Anomalous Communities Detection.

Nowadays, detecting anomalous communities in networks is an essential task in research, as it helps discover insights into community-structured networks. Most of the existing methods leverage either information regarding attributes of vertices or the topological structure of communities. In this study, we introduce the Co-Membership-based Generic Anomalous Communities Detection Algorithm (referred as to CMMAC), a novel and generic method that utilizes the information of vertices co-membership in multiple communities. CMMAC is domain-free and almost unaffected by communities' sizes and densities. Specifically, we train a classifier to predict the probability of each vertex in a community being a member of the community. We then rank the communities by the aggregated membership probabilities of each community's vertices. The lowest-ranked communities are considered to be anomalous. Furthermore, we present an algorithm for generating a community-structured random network enabling the infusion of anomalous communities to facilitate research in the field. We utilized it to generate two datasets, composed of thousands of labeled anomaly-infused networks, and published them. We experimented extensively on thousands of simulated, and real-world networks, infused with artificial anomalies. CMMAC outperformed other existing methods in a range of settings. Additionally, we demonstrated that CMMAC can identify abnormal communities in real-world unlabeled networks in different domains, such as Reddit and Wikipedia.

Scientometric trends for coronaviruses and other emerging viral infections.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is the most rapidly expanding coronavirus outbreak in the past 2 decades. To provide a swift response to a novel outbreak, prior knowledge from similar outbreaks is essential. RESULTS: Here, we study the volume of research conducted on previous coronavirus outbreaks, specifically SARS and MERS, relative to other infectious diseases by analyzing >35 million articles from the past 20 years. Our results demonstrate that previous coronavirus outbreaks have been understudied compared with other viruses. We also show that the research volume of emerging infectious diseases is very high after an outbreak and decreases drastically upon the containment of the disease. This can yield inadequate research and limited investment in gaining a full understanding of novel coronavirus management and prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of the outcome of the current COVID-19 outbreak, we believe that measures should be taken to encourage sustained research in the field.